« previous next »
Pages: [1] 2   Go Down

circular earth

  • 31 Replies
  • 6710 Views
?

djbarratt

  • 30
circular earth
« on: April 11, 2007, 06:18:15 AM »
Many of the earths basic principals are based on circular, indeed dare I say it, spherical forms; atoms, droplets of water, meatballs and peas to name but a few. The circular arguments used on this website are perhaps demonstrative of the inherently circular nature of earth? Discuss.
Logged
?

Vauxhall the Vampire

  • 2811
Re: circular earth
« Reply #1 on: April 11, 2007, 06:26:24 AM »
What are you? Eight?
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #2 on: April 11, 2007, 06:30:43 AM »
what are you, my incarcerated gay uncle's 4 year old retarded niece has a poster just like your picture?
Logged
?

Vauxhall the Vampire

  • 2811
Re: circular earth
« Reply #3 on: April 11, 2007, 06:39:46 AM »
You can't talk. You look like a cracked up eight year neo nazi.
Logged
?

Vauxhall the Vampire

  • 2811
Re: circular earth
« Reply #4 on: April 11, 2007, 06:45:29 AM »
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #5 on: April 11, 2007, 06:57:53 AM »
The Ayrian Super Race V's a vixen and a troll!

I hunt vixens with hounds from atop my valient stead! You should see the blood, oh its divine.
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #6 on: April 11, 2007, 06:59:16 AM »
And your a shit car!
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #7 on: April 11, 2007, 07:10:53 AM »
is that picture the kind of thing you want.
Logged
?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3793
  • We are as one.
Re: circular earth
« Reply #8 on: April 11, 2007, 07:31:24 AM »
Quote from: djbarratt on April 11, 2007, 06:18:15 AM
Many of the earths basic principals are based on circular, indeed dare I say it, spherical forms; atoms, droplets of water, meatballs and peas to name but a few. The circular arguments used on this website are perhaps demonstrative of the inherently circular nature of earth? Discuss.

When you make that intelligible, I'll give it a shot.
Logged
?

Vauxhall the Vampire

  • 2811
Re: circular earth
« Reply #9 on: April 11, 2007, 07:32:53 AM »
Quote from: djbarratt on April 11, 2007, 07:10:53 AM
is that picture the kind of thing you want.

This only proves how vengeful and young you are  :-*
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #10 on: April 11, 2007, 07:41:27 AM »
i am infact only one year younger than your self.
Logged
?

Vauxhall the Vampire

  • 2811
Re: circular earth
« Reply #11 on: April 11, 2007, 07:46:30 AM »
You have the mind and grammar of an eight year old.
Logged
?

BOGWarrior89

  • 3793
  • We are as one.
Re: circular earth
« Reply #12 on: April 11, 2007, 07:53:48 AM »
Quote from: djbarratt on April 11, 2007, 07:41:27 AM
i am infact only one year younger than your self.

Is English not your native language?
Logged
?

Vauxhall the Vampire

  • 2811
Re: circular earth
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2007, 07:54:58 AM »
Quote from: BOGWarrior89 on April 11, 2007, 07:53:48 AM
Quote from: djbarratt on April 11, 2007, 07:41:27 AM
i am infact only one year younger than your self.

Is English not your native language?

I would bet German would be his native language =)
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2007, 08:36:12 AM »
In my original statement,
"Many of the earths basic principals are based on circular, indeed dare I say it, spherical forms; atoms, droplets of water, meatballs and peas to name but a few. The circular arguments used on this website are perhaps demonstrative of the inherently circular nature of earth? Discuss"
I would say I used reasonable language, if anything, your language isn't brilliant. I think your most likely using sigmond freuds theory of protection. 
however i may be wrong so you like to suggest any corrections?
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #15 on: April 11, 2007, 08:50:27 AM »
No.  wow! just like most FEers. ignor the debate when they see their wrong. 
Logged
*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: circular earth
« Reply #16 on: April 11, 2007, 09:06:46 AM »
funny you buys attack him but ot narcberry. 
Logged
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

Quote from: Shifter on July 05, 2020, 09:53:30 AM
It's no slur if it's fact.
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: circular earth
« Reply #17 on: April 11, 2007, 10:26:34 AM »
Quote from: sokarul on April 11, 2007, 09:06:46 AM
funny you guys attack him but not narcberry. 
I think I'm reading that correctly.

I actually was on his side reading through. Usually he is a bit emotive, but his arguments are more valid than the usual RE'er. Even if they can be harder to read.
Logged
?

Tom Bishop

Re: circular earth
« Reply #18 on: April 11, 2007, 10:29:16 AM »
Not all things in the universe form spheres. For example, Saltlicks naturally form into cubes.
Logged
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: circular earth
« Reply #19 on: April 11, 2007, 10:32:02 AM »
Logged
?

djbarratt

  • 30
Re: circular earth
« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2007, 10:49:45 AM »
yes, i suppose that is true. don't worry, i'm not a nazi.  I changed the picture for a laugh earlier!! 
In the creation of earth, would a flat earth be supported by up to date science, the string theory for example (as far as i know the most up to date creation theory)
and although not a natzi, hitler did altleast have ambition, not that i condone his actions.
Logged
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: circular earth
« Reply #21 on: April 11, 2007, 11:51:54 AM »
String theory is so infant, I hardly consider it science. It was a theory invented to explain Hawking's paradox, which is no longer paradoxical. But who knows, with enough evidence I may become a believer.
Logged
*

Midnight

  • 7671
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: circular earth
« Reply #22 on: April 11, 2007, 11:54:51 AM »
Quote from: narcberry on April 11, 2007, 11:51:54 AM
String theory is so infant, I hardly consider it science. It was a theory invented to explain Hawking's paradox, which is no longer paradoxical. But who knows, with enough evidence I may become a believer.

Yet you claim to be an industrial engineer, which, when taken in totality, means you are not a scientist at all, but a blue collar intellectual. This means your "this is not a science much at all" comment has as much weight as a bag of rice.
Logged
Quote from: Raist on September 06, 2010, 07:48:56 PM
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: circular earth
« Reply #23 on: April 11, 2007, 12:04:57 PM »
I never claimed to engineer industrails. I dont even know what an industrail is.

I am the lead technical advisor over industrial projects. My daily tasks include circuit design, real time systems, and fuzzy logic control. All of which are considered science.

What do you do? And, excuse the preemption, how do you cook the patty so evenly?
Logged
*

Midnight

  • 7671
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: circular earth
« Reply #24 on: April 11, 2007, 12:14:58 PM »
Quote from: narcberry on April 11, 2007, 12:04:57 PM
I never claimed to engineer industrails. I dont even know what an industrail is.

I am the lead technical advisor over industrial projects. My daily tasks include circuit design, real time systems, and fuzzy logic control. All of which are considered science.

What do you do? And, excuse the preemption, how do you cook the patty so evenly?

You said you are, and I quote "an industrial engineer".

What I do has absolutely nothing of relevance to the FE or RE model. Again, I don't come here with a stance. Not one of my posts shows my view on RE or FE. This is, again, intentional. I am here to learn from both crowds, and make up my own mind. However, when I see bullshit, I comment on it. It's not complicated.

If you are a lead "technical advisor" then you are not a scientist. You work in science, but you are not a practicing scientist. Again, this means your view of what does, or does not constitute science, is patently idiotic at best, and wishful thinking, at worst.

As for your final statement, it was cute from the "I am in a corner" sort of desperate measures way, but will not get you any farther than your admission of being female, then reverting to women are idiots tirade. Transparent.
Logged
Quote from: Raist on September 06, 2010, 07:48:56 PM
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: circular earth
« Reply #25 on: April 11, 2007, 12:16:46 PM »
Everything you just stated is incorrect, including your self-definition. How sad. Well, back to ignoring the content-less midnight.
Logged
*

Midnight

  • 7671
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: circular earth
« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2007, 12:18:29 PM »
Dodging doesn't change reality. I suppose this ties directly into the FE arguments based on the conspiracy itself. I can't hear you, lalalala.

Failure.
Logged
Quote from: Raist on September 06, 2010, 07:48:56 PM
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: circular earth
« Reply #27 on: April 11, 2007, 12:28:53 PM »
Clearly narcberry is neither an industrial engineer nor a scientist.  I say this because based on his posts he is either

a)13 years old, at the most; or
b)functionally retarded.

It's the most sensible way to explain his half-assed bullshit.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: circular earth
« Reply #28 on: April 11, 2007, 12:32:11 PM »
You'd be surprised how much truth is in my posts. But I guess you'll never know...
Logged
*

Midnight

  • 7671
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: circular earth
« Reply #29 on: April 11, 2007, 12:34:07 PM »
That statement is the definition of irony.
Logged
Quote from: Raist on September 06, 2010, 07:48:56 PM
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.
Pages: [1] 2   Go Up
« previous next »