The conspiracy

  • 41 Replies
  • 9053 Views
?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
The conspiracy
« on: April 10, 2007, 07:00:26 PM »
Where does China fit into the conspiracy? They have a space program. They've sent manned missions into space as well as plenty of satellites.

Let's face it. I just shut your stupid conspiracy up. Time to end this stupid society.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

?

[][][]

  • 554
  • +0/-1
  • Man of science.
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #1 on: April 10, 2007, 07:03:10 PM »
Yeah, Russia has a space program too. Is there some point you are trying to make?
The folly of mistaking a paradox for a discovery, a metaphor for a proof, a torrent of verbiage for a spring of capital truths, and oneself for an oracle, is inborn in us. -Some Frenchy

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #2 on: April 10, 2007, 07:03:57 PM »
Yeah, Russia has a space program too. Is there some point you are trying to make?

Russia is supposedly part of the Conspiracy. No FE'er has ever mentioned China. End result of this post? Conspiracy debunked.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #3 on: April 10, 2007, 07:19:41 PM »
To add to the conspiracy debunking:

Countries capable of satellite launching

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satellite#Launch_capable_countries
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

?

Tom Bishop

Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #4 on: April 10, 2007, 08:28:36 PM »
When a new country is ready to set foot in space the Conspiracy steps in to sell them technologies under the condition that it administrates its space program.

For instance, when United Kingdom wanted into space, the Conspiracy gave them the necessary rocket and satellite technology developed in the Cold War under the friendly name of NASA.

When Communist China wanted into space the Conspiracy gave them the multi-trilllion dollar technology under the friendly name of the Russian Space Agency.

By doing this the Conspiracy is able to establish itself in multiple countries, multiplying its revenue by an order of magnitude and sucking each respective nation dry with its fiction.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2007, 08:32:57 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #5 on: April 10, 2007, 08:32:42 PM »
Abject pathology of bourbon.
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

?

Tom Bishop

Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #6 on: April 10, 2007, 08:38:18 PM »
And if the Conspiracy misses or is unable to procure a foothold in a country's space program, it is absolutely okay. There is no risk involved.

No one is going to believe Joe Scientist from Brazil who claims that the world is flat. No respectable media outlet would report such a thing. It would barely even make a blip in the tabloids.

It's the perfect scheme, in retrospect.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2007, 08:42:24 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

akira

  • 415
  • +0/-0
  • Round Earth Proponent
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #7 on: April 10, 2007, 08:50:28 PM »
So perfect, you and your community have doubts on it? Shouldn't that be imperfect?
GPS does not require satellites, fortunately it uses it.

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #8 on: April 10, 2007, 08:54:46 PM »
Deleted another post, eh tommy boy?

You really are beautiful. Still failing though.
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

?

Tom Bishop

Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #9 on: April 10, 2007, 09:31:02 PM »
So perfect, you and your community have doubts on it? Shouldn't that be imperfect?

We know the Conspiracy exists from the following pieces of evidence:

- Numerous NASA leaks and photographic evidence from detractors (Samuel Shenton).

- Fired NASA employees tend to join the Flat Earth Society.

- Every Round Earth picture on NASA's website has Photoshop headers.

- A piece of foam can cause a multi-billion dollar space shuttle to be destroyed.

- NASA contrives the results of its mars missions before launch.

- NASA deliberately edits its own images and fakes data loss.

- NASA deliberately released low resolution versions of their mars imaging to encourage public hype about the Cydonia Menasae.

- The list goes on and on, but I'll stop here for now.


In addition, no amount of swindled billions could cover up these simple peer-reviewed experiments anyone can cheaply perform at home to demonstrate a Flat Earth:

Experiment 1
Experiment 2
Experiment 3
Experiment 4
Experiment 5
Experiment 6
Experiment 7
Experiment 8
Experiment 9
Experiment 10
Experiment 11
Experiment 12
Experiment 13
Experiment 14
Experiment 15
« Last Edit: April 10, 2007, 09:37:32 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #10 on: April 10, 2007, 10:16:18 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

?

Tom Bishop

Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #11 on: April 10, 2007, 10:26:19 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.

Which is why the U.S. only gives countries advanced technology under the condition of full administrative oversight.

For example, the U.S. has already given Nuclear Reactors to many nations of the Earth under the condition of oversight and periodical collection of wasted plutonium.

The U.S. would lease you a Nuclear Reactor for your home if you paid them enough.
« Last Edit: April 10, 2007, 10:31:52 PM by Tom Bishop »

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #12 on: April 10, 2007, 11:00:49 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.

Which is why the U.S. only gives countries advanced technology under the condition of full administrative oversight.

For example, the U.S. has already given Nuclear Reactors to many nations of the Earth under the condition of oversight and periodical collection of wasted plutonium.

The U.S. would lease you a Nuclear Reactor for your home if you paid them enough.

Is life scary, Tom?  Being that naive, cynical, and paranoid? :D :D
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

Ambassadork

  • 231
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #13 on: April 11, 2007, 05:45:31 AM »
When a new country is ready to set foot in space the Conspiracy steps in to sell them technologies under the condition that it administrates its space program.

For instance, when United Kingdom wanted into space, the Conspiracy gave them the necessary rocket and satellite technology developed in the Cold War under the friendly name of NASA.

When Communist China wanted into space the Conspiracy gave them the multi-trilllion dollar technology under the friendly name of the Russian Space Agency.

By doing this the Conspiracy is able to establish itself in multiple countries, multiplying its revenue by an order of magnitude and sucking each respective nation dry with its fiction.
Source, please.







Oh, you're pulling shit out of your ass again? Gotcha ::)

?

Tom Bishop

Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #14 on: April 11, 2007, 09:39:26 AM »

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #15 on: April 11, 2007, 09:41:40 AM »
You know we lease nuclear technology so they dont build nuclear bombs right?
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

Tom Bishop

Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #16 on: April 11, 2007, 09:44:23 AM »
So why not lease rocket technology so other countries couldn't build Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles?

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #17 on: April 11, 2007, 09:48:43 AM »
They could.  But then as you said they could lease rocket technology, as in we went into space as we have the technology.

And BTW do you really think NASA builds all there rockets and other space iteams?   

Quote from: tom
- NASA contrives the results of its mars missions before launch.
dihydrogen monoxide is bad for you too according to websites like this one. 
« Last Edit: April 11, 2007, 09:51:08 AM by sokarul »
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #18 on: April 11, 2007, 11:51:51 AM »
This is one of those arguments that ties into common sense being butt fucked into oblivion.

For an example, the "need for interrogation of enemy combatants".

A justification given is that "they know where the weapons of mass destruction are hiding."

First of all, to go back into the main topic, that ties into what I said above:

Rogue states, shadowy cabals, and all that hoopla, do not NEED our science.

What I mean is, these people who are accused of "being in the conspiracy", in point of fact, could make whatever tech they need, ON THEIR OWN, given time, tennacity, and budget. Budget itself comes in MANY forms.

I find it patently ridiculous that people assume the earth is flat and a conspiracy is in effect, by that sheer fact alone. Einsteins work is not a secret. The Russians built their myriad war machines using it. Tesla and his work is no longer in his head. "Genie out of the bottle" kids.

That argument is thus moot.
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #19 on: April 11, 2007, 12:14:21 PM »
Exactly. We aren't living in the earlier parts of the 20th century, where technology of this sort is still in the early years. We're in the 21st century people. There are tech savvy countries all over the world. To think America and Russia are the only ones who can give out this power is just being ignorant.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #20 on: April 11, 2007, 12:28:11 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.

Know anything about the middle east?

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #21 on: April 11, 2007, 12:32:35 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.

Know anything about the middle east?

Yes. But, please elaborate. Explain the technologies, besides their AK47's and rocket launchers.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #22 on: April 11, 2007, 12:33:24 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.

Know anything about the middle east?

Do you? And, on a finer line, what does that have to do with anything at all?
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #23 on: April 11, 2007, 12:36:04 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.

Know anything about the middle east?

Yes. But, please elaborate. Explain the technologies, besides their AK47's and rocket launchers.


Nope, I was just referencing that the US has in fact given out technologies to those that would later oppose us.

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #24 on: April 11, 2007, 12:37:22 PM »
Which doesn't support your other remarks. Again, dodging.
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #25 on: April 11, 2007, 12:40:14 PM »
Tom, you are comical! The U.S would NEVER give technology that could let other countries attack them. You're just being naive.

Know anything about the middle east?

Yes. But, please elaborate. Explain the technologies, besides their AK47's and rocket launchers.


Nope, I was just referencing that the US has in fact given out technologies to those that would later oppose us.

Bingo. Ak47s and rocket launchers are in a completely different ball park than aerospace engineering. But, it's just another way you simple minded folk over look things.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #26 on: April 11, 2007, 12:42:40 PM »
So, my point is in direct opposition to what you were saying, you validate its correctness, and I'm the one being simple-minded?

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #27 on: April 11, 2007, 12:47:56 PM »
So, my point is in direct opposition to what you were saying, you validate its correctness, and I'm the one being simple-minded?

Fine, if you can attack the U.S from the middle east using an AK47 and/or a simple rocket launcher, than I'll say I was wrong. Until then, I am sticking to what I said.
Basic hand-held weapons aren't "technology". It's not as if the middle east had never seen a gun before, so they aren't introducing new technology. Huge difference. Once again, you can't comprehend that.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • +0/-0
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #28 on: April 11, 2007, 12:51:32 PM »
So, my point is in direct opposition to what you were saying, you validate its correctness, and I'm the one being simple-minded?

Fine, if you can attack the U.S from the middle east using an AK47 and/or a simple rocket launcher, than I'll say I was wrong. Until then, I am sticking to what I said.
Basic hand-held weapons aren't "technology". It's not as if the middle east had never seen a gun before, so they aren't introducing new technology. Huge difference. Once again, you can't comprehend that.

So you're saying the United States has not suffered from giving weapons to other nations, and in addition those weapons contain no technologies? Wow, forget the shape of the earth, we may need to take a time-out and explain some basics here.

?

Jesus Reborn

  • 239
  • +0/-0
Re: The conspiracy
« Reply #29 on: April 11, 2007, 01:01:33 PM »
So, my point is in direct opposition to what you were saying, you validate its correctness, and I'm the one being simple-minded?

Fine, if you can attack the U.S from the middle east using an AK47 and/or a simple rocket launcher, than I'll say I was wrong. Until then, I am sticking to what I said.
Basic hand-held weapons aren't "technology". It's not as if the middle east had never seen a gun before, so they aren't introducing new technology. Huge difference. Once again, you can't comprehend that.

So you're saying the United States has not suffered from giving weapons to other nations, and in addition those weapons contain no technologies? Wow, forget the shape of the earth, we may need to take a time-out and explain some basics here.

I never said anything about attacking U.S soldiers. I said the U.S, the actual country of the U.S. And as for technologies, I said "new". Understand the word? The middle east wasn't just a bunch of savages like your media tells you they are.
Open your eyes to the real world and stop warping words just so you can create a debate out of nothing. This is, essentially, what this whole forum is about. It's a place where people like yourself, who have nothing of a life (I admit, I have no life right now, exams, so I come here during my study breaks) and want to do nothing by try to prove to the world you are actually right, when the rest of the world laughs at you. You then, take this into thought as you being the savior (God said: You'll be ridiculed) of our planet and when you 'prove' everyone wrong, you'll be a hero to them, instead of the loser you were your whole life. I don't condone people picking on helpless people, but you are no longer helpless, therefore, you deserve any attack that is thrown your way.
Best SNL skit ever: " class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I predict Michale Crichton's next book will be based on the Flat Earth Society.