What proof exactly?

  • 46 Replies
  • 11828 Views
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #30 on: April 05, 2007, 04:13:38 PM »
Evidence of a conspiracy has nothing to do with experiments, Tom!  You're grasping here.
You want evidence but scoff at experiments? "Grasping" is probably what we're all doing to discover your true goal.

I asked for evidence of the conspiracy, not evidence of a round earth.  I'm not interested in refuting the experiments right now.  I'm interested in seeing a logical reason to believe that such a conspiracy exists.  Tom responded to my post by changing the subject, narc, and I was pointing that out.
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

Tom Bishop

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #31 on: April 05, 2007, 04:18:09 PM »
Quote
I asked for evidence of the conspiracy, not evidence of a round earth.  I'm not interested in refuting the experiments right now.  I'm interested in seeing a logical reason to believe that such a conspiracy exists.  Tom responded to my post by changing the subject, narc, and I was pointing that out.

You'd like evidence for something that by definition is unknowable?

The Conspiracy exists because if the Earth is flat there are only two possibilities: Either the Government is bad at science, or they are deliberately hiding the truth.

I present a clear history and motive of the Conspiracy in this thread.

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #32 on: April 05, 2007, 04:19:57 PM »
The conspiricy has one motive: to keep itself alive. :o

Nasa takes tax dollars and makes high-end photoshopping and imaging software to fake space missions. This is done to create the illusion of a round earth, which is done to use tax -dollars to make imaging software. The whole damn consipicy is one huge paradoxial loop.
 8)

See? make a comprehensive list of motives, narc, then I'll believe you...maybe.
Plato: People are inherently bad.
Aristotle: People are inherently good.
Me: People are inherently stupid.

*

narcberry

  • 5623
  • Official Flat Earth Society Spokesman/min
Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #33 on: April 05, 2007, 04:39:32 PM »
The conspiricy has one motive: to keep itself alive. :o

Nasa takes tax dollars and makes high-end photoshopping and imaging software to fake space missions. This is done to create the illusion of a round earth, which is done to use tax -dollars to make imaging software. The whole damn consipicy is one huge paradoxial loop.
 8)

See? make a comprehensive list of motives, narc, then I'll believe you...maybe.


Why is it that the people with no evidence ask for more than a little, but a "comprehensive" amount... and even then admit they wont believe you.

Who needs a comprehensive amount, when the motive to keep the masses calm is motive enough?

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #34 on: April 05, 2007, 05:09:16 PM »
Why the hell would the earth being flat cause mass panic?

"holy $*#&!! the earth is flat!?! MY LIFE IS OVER! NOOOOOO!!!"

Come up with a more plausible explaination please narc.
Plato: People are inherently bad.
Aristotle: People are inherently good.
Me: People are inherently stupid.

*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 27043
  • I'm the boss.
Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #35 on: April 05, 2007, 05:15:39 PM »
Quote
You'd like evidence for something that by definition is unknowable?

The Conspiracy exists because if the Earth is flat there are only two possibilities: Either the Government is bad at science, or they are deliberately hiding the truth.

I present a clear history and motive of the Conspiracy in this thread.

I see plenty about motives, Tom, and lots of speculation based on the premise that the earth must be flat, but no evidence.  If you have no evidence, and all your "proof" of its existence starts with the premise that the earth must be flat, how can you use it to demonstrate the flatness of the earth to people who believe in a round earth?  Circular reasoning, Tom.  You guys are pros at it.  Please quit bullshitting around.

But while I have your ear, Tom, what about that map?  150 years of FET and not a single proponent has tried to make an accurate map?
« Last Edit: April 05, 2007, 05:24:52 PM by Tom Bishop »
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?

?

Tom Bishop

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #36 on: April 05, 2007, 05:25:04 PM »
Quote
If you have no evidence, and all your "proof" of its existence starts with the premise that the earth must be flat, how can you use it to demonstrate the flatness of the earth to people who believe in a round earth?  Circular reasoning, Tom.  You guys are pros at it.  Please quit bullshitting around.

Rowbotham provides several simple experiments proving the earth as a flat disk in his book Earth Not a Globe. I'd suggest you read it. There have also been many experiments provided on these forums that suggest a Flat Earth.

Quote
But while I have your ear, Tom, what about that map?  150 years of FET and not a single proponent has tried to make an accurate map?

Here's a map: http://i11.tinypic.com/2w2mzr5.png

?

akira

  • 415
  • Round Earth Proponent
Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #37 on: April 05, 2007, 05:55:56 PM »
Haha, what a map. did your 6 year old grandchild draw it?

~Akira
GPS does not require satellites, fortunately it uses it.

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #38 on: April 05, 2007, 09:30:21 PM »
A respected astrologer, Anders Persson explains,"The Coriolis effect does not depend on the curvature of the Earth, only on its rotation." Which is quite consistant with flat earth theory.
A Flat disc does not explain why Coriolis force causes storms to spin in the opposite direction is the southern hemi-world.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #39 on: April 05, 2007, 09:37:40 PM »

6) 99.99 % people believe in the round earth, not because it is a conspiracy, but because it is REAL.There is absolutely no flaw in the RE theory and everything about it can be scientificaly explained.
Ok, then please fully explain this 'gravity'.

Quote
7) Ferdinand Magellan sailed the world long before a ''goverment would start the conspiracy'' and he prooved it was round.
He proved you can circumnavigate the earth, which is quite possible on the FE.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #40 on: April 05, 2007, 09:57:19 PM »
That map posted is just sad. So all the distances on that map would be true for our day to day lives? lmao.

?

Tom Bishop

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #41 on: April 05, 2007, 11:20:44 PM »
That map posted is just sad. So all the distances on that map would be true for our day to day lives? lmao.

Rent a plane and circumnavigate Antarctica with a video camera. If it exists as a continent we'll admit we were wrong.
« Last Edit: April 05, 2007, 11:22:20 PM by Tom Bishop »

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #42 on: April 05, 2007, 11:23:51 PM »
You can go tour antartica if you have enough money.

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #43 on: April 06, 2007, 02:15:30 AM »

2) If you happen to see Italy over the Adriattic sea from Croatia, you won't see all of the Italian coast from the shore up, just the highest mountains, which prooves the curvature of the earth.
Also you have to be on a mountain or some higher ground and on a clear day to see it.
These are the same idea, and both are addressed in Earth: Not a Globe. As well as many topics on these boards.



If this is explained in Earth:not a globe why didn't anyone say anything about it here:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12214.0
RE= REALITY

FE= FAKE

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #44 on: April 06, 2007, 02:28:06 AM »
1) When you see a ship dissapearing on the horizon, you would first see the hull dissapear and then the pole, it won't just fade out.

2) If you happen to see Italy over the Adriattic sea from Croatia, you won't see all of the Italian coast from the shore up, just the highest mountains, which prooves the curvature of the earth.
Also you have to be on a mountain or some higher ground and on a clear day to see it.
These are the same idea, and both are addressed in Earth: Not a Globe. As well as many topics on these boards.

3) The International Space Station and other satellites are visible with a telescope.And don't give me that crap that they are all helium baloons, they move too fast to be helium baloons, plus the tehnology and production of them are completely explained and the tehnology does exist, it isn't just made up.There is a complete log of making the ISS.
They only move "that fast" if they are "that high". So if they are helium balloons, they will be much lower, and actually travel much slower. Regardless, it is very easy to move at supersonic speed when the atmosphere is so thin. The technology is there, which is why the balloon is able to give us useful data. We only contest its ability to maintain a position above the earth.

4) It isn't explained how the Coriolis effect would work with FE yet
A respected astrologer, Anders Persson explains,"The Coriolis effect does not depend on the curvature of the Earth, only on its rotation." Which is quite consistant with flat earth theory.

5) There should be thousands of witnesses of the Ice wall in the last 500 years, not everyone can be bribed.
Thousands of witnesses? Not only is the ice wall an unpopular, for many reasons, destination. But if it is guarded by the United States, who would return to tell the tale?

6) 99.99 % people believe in the round earth, not because it is a conspiracy, but because it is REAL.There is absolutely no flaw in the RE theory and everything about it can be scientificaly explained.
Aside from popularity, the same goes for flat earth theory.

7) Ferdinand Magellan sailed the world long before a ''goverment would start the conspiracy'' and he prooved it was round.
Evidence of Magellan's expeditions are very porous. As far as scientists are concerned, there is no evidence that can truly be considered regarding the shape of the earth. His evidence mostly consists of secondary witnesses and heresay.

So, basically, all of the things that I said about RE are true. But, according to you, all the things are plausible on a flat earth too. Except RE has more sence, because there is no conspiracy and round earthers don't say that books like the Bible or other books regarding Flat Earth are ''very porous'' or fake. RE accepts this books as a chapter in human history, and that is what they are, history.

In astronomy the distance in space is calculated in AU(astronomical units).1 AU is the distance between the Earth and the Sun. By accepting FE you reject everything that modern astronomy has accomplished.
RE= REALITY

FE= FAKE

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #45 on: April 08, 2007, 03:50:09 AM »

2) If you happen to see Italy over the Adriattic sea from Croatia, you won't see all of the Italian coast from the shore up, just the highest mountains, which prooves the curvature of the earth.
Also you have to be on a mountain or some higher ground and on a clear day to see it.
These are the same idea, and both are addressed in Earth: Not a Globe. As well as many topics on these boards.




Would someone please answer this?

If this is explained in Earth:not a globe why didn't anyone say anything about it here:

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=12214.0
« Last Edit: April 08, 2007, 10:12:22 AM by leclerc »
RE= REALITY

FE= FAKE

Re: What proof exactly?
« Reply #46 on: April 08, 2007, 02:54:11 PM »
not a very good argument, just because everyone believes somthing, doesn't mean that they are right.  at one time, everyone believed the earth was flat.  does that mean they were right?  following your argument, they were. But then, so are the people of today. and so what you must be saying is that the earth was flat at one time but it has now become round?  that makes even less sense.

sorry for mocking your argument. i thought it would be funny.