Sick and tired of the non-believers!

Quote from: ConspiracySayWha on April 04, 2007, 02:24:39 AM

The majority of you do.

The trolls do.

What accusations are these?

Quote from: TheEngineer on April 04, 2007, 02:33:27 AM

Quote from: ConspiracySayWha on April 04, 2007, 02:24:39 AM

The majority of you do.

The trolls do.

What accusations are these?

read back.


@OP: I'm sick and tired of plenty of things, but I live with them. Hell, I'm sick and tired of life sometimes.

You fucking idiot, you shouldn't even have a teaching licence/degree! You have no right to teach grade 5s of your bullshit.

Quote from: sokarul on March 31, 2007, 07:05:20 PM

I sure hope this is one of the joke threads.  That map doesn't even have Australia. 

Australia is right there, near the top of the map, next to New Zealand. Learn your geography before commenting.

Holy shit....you are a fucking idiot..........YOU are telling someone to learn their geography?!? God damn...

RE is based on a book written in the 1600's? Where did you get that idea from, Plato and Aristotle realized the Earth was round before Christ was born using something forgien to you FE'ers called... Science.

Q: If the Earth is flat, then why does a boats hull dissapear over the horizon before its mast?

Q: If the Earth is flat and the sun hovers over it, then how can I plainly see it dipping below the horizon at night instead of just getting dimmer and dimmer?

Q: If the Earth is flat, please explain why the shadow of Earth during an eclipse is clearly spherical.

Q: If the Earth is flat... then why the hell has no one noticed this from outer space... whats on the otherside people?

Quote from: Flat Earth Master Mint on April 03, 2007, 09:32:11 PM

Quote from: TheEngineer on April 03, 2007, 08:53:42 PM

RE'ers base all their physics on a book that is even older.  What's your point?

What book?

Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, written in the late 1680's.

I'm sorry, can you prove that claim? Its the FEers who send the readers to a book when the FEer can't answer the question.

Quote from: Flat Earth Master Mint on April 03, 2007, 09:32:11 PM

Quote from: TheEngineer on April 03, 2007, 08:53:42 PM

RE'ers base all their physics on a book that is even older.  What's your point?

What book?

Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, written in the late 1680's.

Yes, and uh, how many experiments have been done by FE'ers since this guy did his? And uh, how many experiments have been done by people who believe the Earth is round?

Oh, and prove that all science is based off of this book, and then prove this guy didn't base his stuff off of this book.


EDIT: Ten bucks says I get no response on either points from FE'ers actually explaining anything.

Quote from: ConspiracySayWha on April 04, 2007, 02:24:39 AM

The majority of you do.

The trolls do.

So you're a troll ?

You guys don't know who wrote Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, or even what is contained within, do you?

You guys don't know who wrote Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica, or even what is contained within, do you?

It contains the statement of Newton's laws of motion forming the foundation of classical mechanics as well as his law of universal gravitation. He derives Kepler's laws for the motion of the planets (which were first obtained empirically).

In formulating his physical theories, Newton had developed a field of mathematics known as calculus. However, the language of calculus was largely left out of the Principia. Instead, Newton recast the majority of his proofs as geometric arguments.

It is in the Principia that Newton expressed his famous Hypotheses non fingo ("I feign no hypotheses").

The Principia consists of three books

• De motu corporum (On the motion of bodies) is a mathematical exposition of calculus followed by statements of basic dynamical definitions and the primary deductions based on these. It also contains propositions and proofs that have little to do with dynamics but demonstrate the kinds of problems that can be solved using calculus.
• The first book was divided into a second volume because of its length. It contains sundry applications such as motion through a resistive medium, a derivation of the shape of least resistance, a derivation of the speed of sound and accounts of experimental tests of the result.
• De mundi systemate (On the system of the world) is an essay on universal gravitation that builds upon the propositions of the previous books and applies them to the motions observed in the solar system — the regularities and the irregularities of the orbit of the moon, the derivations of Kepler's laws, applications to the motion of Jupiter's moons, to comets and tides (much of the data came from John Flamsteed). It also considers the harmonic oscillator in three dimensions, and motion in arbitrary force laws.

I looked it up a while ago, since you kept going on about it. Seeing as I dropped science last year so don't even do AS level Science, it's not hard to understand how I don't fully understand it..but I think that's the basics there. Or at least part of it.

    There's no way this guy is a teacher.  He's obviously not serious about anything.  Of course if this guy taught about a flat earth in any type of school (secular or religious) he'd lose his job almost immediately after first bringing it up.

Add Genesis 9:13 to the list of "FEers" to not take seriously.

  There's no way this guy is a teacher.  He's obviously not serious about anything.  Of course if this guy taught about a flat earth in any type of school (secular or religious) he'd lose his job almost immediately after first bringing it up.

Add Genesis 9:13 to the list of "FEers" to not take seriously.

You can teach any opinion in a public school, except that its not ok to be gay, and be legal threat free.

Quote from: duuuuh on April 04, 2007, 02:48:35 PM

  There's no way this guy is a teacher.  He's obviously not serious about anything.  Of course if this guy taught about a flat earth in any type of school (secular or religious) he'd lose his job almost immediately after first bringing it up.

Add Genesis 9:13 to the list of "FEers" to not take seriously.

You can teach any opinion in a public school, except that its not ok to be gay, and be legal threat free.

No you can't.  Some states (as stated earlier) have banned the teachings of evolutionism.  Looks like you're wrong here, just like in every other thread.

Besides, Newtonian physics only lasted us until the 1900s... now we're into Einsteinian physics, which is so much cooler, and so much more recent too.  Sure, it still keeps a lot of the things the same, but I don't consider physics based on Newton anymore.

Even Relativity has its base in Newtonian physics.

I want to just say....

Does it really even matter if the earth is round or flat?

No...

It would not affect me one way or the other...so w/e man

if its flat, cool wow yay

if its round, amazing nice, uberness

even if it was fucking banana shaped...I still...would not...give a fuck

as long as I am still able to have sex, go to denny's and drink coffee, listen to aweosme music, and take shits uninterupted...

i dont care.


nobody cares

....

but I still think anyone who would believe the earth is flat....is dumb

I want to just say....

Does it really even matter if the earth is round or flat?

No...

It would not affect me one way or the other...so w/e man

if its flat, cool wow yay

if its round, amazing nice, uberness

even if it was fucking banana shaped...I still...would not...give a fuck

as long as I am still able to have sex, go to denny's and drink coffee, listen to aweosme music, and take shits uninterupted...

i dont care.


nobody cares

....

but I still think anyone who would believe the earth is flat....is dumb

Then get back to your monotony, autonomous drone.

ohh big words

 

trying to impress someone?

ohh big words

 

trying to impress someone?

Those aren't big - the biggest word in the english language is "smiles".  I was actually trying to be concise and still state my point.

how is smiles the biggest word?

how is smiles the biggest word?

Because there's a mile between the two "s"s.

I find this forum highly amusing, but when I see people like Genesis, its just stupid. Hes a teacher at a school and he stands by this stupid theory that has so many different reasons why it cannot be true. Genesis, by looking at your flat world map, explain to me why, when pilots fly from europe to australia they travel south? They travel through asia to get there. Your stupid map says that really they should be going across the north pole to get there. Also, this thing about Antartica not existing, how come people have been to the South Pole? It isn't the ice wall at all, its a huge continent. Also the whole round earth conspiracy thing is so funny, why in the hell would anyone want to cover up that the earth is flat, who could possible benefit from this? Also, the fact NASA used funding to forge pictures of a round earth? Absolute nonesense!

I find this forum highly amusing, but when I see people like Genesis, its just stupid. Hes a teacher at a school and he stands by this stupid theory that has so many different reasons why it cannot be true. Genesis, by looking at your flat world map, explain to me why, when pilots fly from europe to australia they travel south? They travel through asia to get there. Your stupid map says that really they should be going across the north pole to get there. Also, this thing about Antartica not existing, how come people have been to the South Pole? It isn't the ice wall at all, its a huge continent. Also the whole round earth conspiracy thing is so funny, why in the hell would anyone want to cover up that the earth is flat, who could possible benefit from this? Also, the fact NASA used funding to forge pictures of a round earth? Absolute nonesense!

He's obviously not a teacher, and just trolling everyone. A flat-earth believing teacher who beats his students in Virginia? Please.

Yeah...
This whole "Virginia is a state" theory is just crazy

Quote from: Nicolae Carpathia on April 01, 2007, 09:44:08 AM

Where do you live? In the bible belt? It can't be in the USA, they would have already arrested you for poisoning the mind of the kids.

I live and work in Virginia, USA, best place on earth. Don't worry about the minds of our American children my friend, they are well and safe here. We just don't let them get corrupted like elsewhere in the world. You see, a good and truthful education goes a long way.

Where in Virginia? That way I know whether or not I need to pack up and GTFO.

Yeah...
This whole "Virginia is a state" theory is just crazy

Indeed. Virginia is a Commonwealth.

Quote from: Chris Columbus II on April 05, 2007, 02:44:23 AM

I find this forum highly amusing, but when I see people like Genesis, its just stupid. Hes a teacher at a school and he stands by this stupid theory that has so many different reasons why it cannot be true. Genesis, by looking at your flat world map, explain to me why, when pilots fly from europe to australia they travel south? They travel through asia to get there. Your stupid map says that really they should be going across the north pole to get there. Also, this thing about Antartica not existing, how come people have been to the South Pole? It isn't the ice wall at all, its a huge continent. Also the whole round earth conspiracy thing is so funny, why in the hell would anyone want to cover up that the earth is flat, who could possible benefit from this? Also, the fact NASA used funding to forge pictures of a round earth? Absolute nonesense!

He's obviously not a teacher, and just trolling everyone. A flat-earth believing teacher who beats his students in Virginia? Please.

Well...the beating part might be true. You don't know what goes on behind institution doors now a days. Just last month a woman was found guilty of 20 years worth of brutal abuse to her foster children. She got away with it for that long.

but yeah. He's trolling. And badly.

Quote from: duuuuh on April 04, 2007, 02:48:35 PM

  There's no way this guy is a teacher.  He's obviously not serious about anything.  Of course if this guy taught about a flat earth in any type of school (secular or religious) he'd lose his job almost immediately after first bringing it up.

Add Genesis 9:13 to the list of "FEers" to not take seriously.

You can teach any opinion in a public school, except that its not ok to be gay, and be legal threat free.

PUT DOWN THE CRACKPIPE NACRBERRY. Lol. Who said you can teach, literally, anything in a public school? Maybe since you never attended a school of any kind you wouldn't know but if a teacher was instructing children things that were blatantly wrong (like up is down, the earth is flat, ect.) they would probably end up getting fired very quickly.

There's no "probably" about it.  if Genesis was really poisoning young minds like he claims, he would have been fired.  Period.  He might have thought he could make himself seem smarter if he claimed to be a teacher (or maybe he's just fucking around), but it's pure bullshit.

while respecting your beliefs, and the evidence you believe is proof of your beliefs.... how can you rule out all of the evidence that goes AGAINST it? it seems you fashion yourself a person who not only believes in a flat earth, but who believes in physical PROOF, no? so i ask in all sincerity here, how can you rule out physical evidence extending beyond your beliefs as well? isn't that evidence as good as any?