You know I really shouldn't have come in here like that without reading the FAQ. That was my mistake, but after reading it, how could I really dispute this? I mean all these years I have been just making the evidence fit with the RE theory instead of doing what I should be doing and making reasonable conclusions based on the evidence. It DOES make sense if you look at it objectively, I had never thought of it like that.
Im not going to say that Tom is a genius but what a clear thinker! It takes an almost clairvoient sensibility to even begin to question the accepted norms, but to see uninhibited through the scientific dogma as he has is clearly impressive. Blinded by science, so they say, I was, but no longer. Thanks for opening my eyes, I'll have to really consider this now and who knows maybe I've been wrong about a lot of other things as well.