« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Orientation of the FE

  • 36 Replies
  • 8117 Views
?

silverhammermba

  • 172
  • Anger makes me debate. Debating makes me angry.
Re: Orientation of the FE
« Reply #30 on: March 27, 2007, 10:47:59 PM »
Trust me, it's not geography. Maybe this will help.

(Gimme a break, I drew it in MS Paint in like 2 minutes)

Anyway, do you see what I mean? The map on the right is entirely equivalent to the other as far as the placement and relations of the continents and both would conform perfectly to what all of the FE'ers are arguing for. But they clearly have entirely different geography! It's got to be one or the other, but either the sizes of the continents are immensely different or (if the sizes are the same between the two versions) the distances between them are.

With an RE model, switching the North and South poles is no big deal: if you turn a globe upside-down, it's still the same globe. But with FE, if you switch the edge of the disk with the center, you get a dramatically different object.
Logged
Quote from: Kasroa
Tom usually says at this point that people have seen the ice-wall. It is the Ross Ice Shelf. That usually kills the conversation by the power of sheer bull-shit alone.
*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Orientation of the FE
« Reply #31 on: March 27, 2007, 11:01:00 PM »
And the point of all this is...? Obviously we live in the first case, and therefore any examination of the other is pointless.
Logged
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.

?

silverhammermba

  • 172
  • Anger makes me debate. Debating makes me angry.
Re: Orientation of the FE
« Reply #32 on: March 29, 2007, 12:47:35 PM »
Quote from: Franc T., Planar on March 27, 2007, 11:01:00 PM
Obviously we live in the first case

Ooooh, so you might as well say "Obviously the Earth is flat." and end your argument there. My question is why is it the first case when the second case is just as viable?

And why are there no other FE'ers responding to this? It's a big issue with your theory!
Logged
Quote from: Kasroa
Tom usually says at this point that people have seen the ice-wall. It is the Ross Ice Shelf. That usually kills the conversation by the power of sheer bull-shit alone.
?

WHAT????

Re: Orientation of the FE
« Reply #33 on: March 29, 2007, 01:06:45 PM »
I cant belive that i made an account just for this this but anyway...... THE EARTHE CANT BE FLAT!!!! WHERE THE F@#& THOSE THE SUN GO AT NIGTH....... TO A HOLE IN THE FLAT EARTH????? GEEEZZ PEOPLE 
Logged
?

Flat Earth Master Mint

  • 81
Re: Orientation of the FE
« Reply #34 on: March 29, 2007, 01:08:35 PM »
Quote from: silverhammermba on March 27, 2007, 09:51:55 PM
What if we called the North pole the "Spoon brigade"
I suuport this 110%.
Logged
*

Midnight

  • 7671
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: Orientation of the FE
« Reply #35 on: March 29, 2007, 01:09:24 PM »
Spork Brigade. Heathens!
Logged
Quote from: Raist on September 06, 2010, 07:48:56 PM
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.
*

James

  • Flat Earther
  • The Elder Ones
  • 5613
Re: Orientation of the FE
« Reply #36 on: April 12, 2007, 08:37:30 PM »
Silverhammer:

What point are you trying to make? As stated previously, asking "why is the North Pole at the center" is akin to asking "why is japan an island?". There is no magic reason why this is the case, it just is. If you want a literal answer, it would be a big long chronology of the geological movements of the Earth's materials throughout the history of time.
Logged
"For your own sake, as well as for that of our beloved country, be bold and firm against error and evil of every kind." - David Wardlaw Scott, Terra Firma 1901
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »