Debate

1. If there's no gravity then tide wouldn't happen.
2. If the sun is spotlight then you would see it even in the dark.
3. If the earth is accelerating e.g. even from 3000BC till then earth will be moving faster than light. - Violate special relativity.

1. Tide goes in, tide goes out
2. You can't see forever
3. Wrong, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

3. If the earth is accelerating e.g. even from 3000BC till then earth will be moving faster than light. - Violate special relativity.

Please,
do go on.

Wow, such debate skills.  This angry noob must be at least 12 years old. 

How about you learn special relativity before you say something violates it.

1. Tide goes in, tide goes out
2. You can't see forever
3. Wrong, https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special_relativity

Everything has a cause, so what causes the tide to go out and come back in? Why is the timing tied to the phases of the moon?

Then you claim that "You can't see forever". Nobody is claiming to see forever, only saying that we can see the sun quite clearly when it is setting, say 14,000 km away, but see no sign of the sun when it is around 20,000 km away!

Rowbotham clearly states that planets can be seen at all points around their orbits in his "ZETETIC ASTRONOMY, ZETETIC AND THEORETIC DEFINED AND COMPARED", pages 322, 323. See Rowbotham claims we can see planets on the far side of the North Pole.

Wow, such debate skills.  This angry noob must be at least 12 years old.

Well how else can you start something up while surrounded by an entire website of people who have completely different scientific viewpoints

Speaking of different scientific viewpoints, why not explain to me how an accelerating earth surpasses C?

Edit, no one ruin my fun, looking at you Rab.

Wow, such debate skills.  This angry noob must be at least 12 years old.

Sure, I don't agree with the OP either, but what makes you think he is "angry". You always seem to be the angry one around here. 
I guess if you have no facts, just guesses like "atmoplanic lensing" to explain simple everyday observations it's all you can do.

1. If there's no gravity then tide wouldn't happen.
2. If the sun is spotlight then you would see it even in the dark.
3. If the earth is accelerating e.g. even from 3000BC till then earth will be moving faster than light. - Violate special relativity.

1. There are multiple potential explanations.
2. You can only see a spotlight from certain positions; if it's fair enough away horizontally, the light from the lit face won't reach you.
3. The addition of relativistic velocities is done differently.

Hello! I am new here - on the fence - but favoring TFES. Please provide one sentence as to why your society is the better option in this major scientific debate. 

Hello! I am new here - on the fence - but favoring google. Please provide one sentence as to why your society is the better option in this major scientific debate. 

I'm sure google will be glad to meet you.

Please provide one sentence as to why your society is the better option in this major scientific debate. 

We are better looking.

Quote from: SkepticSoph on November 07, 2016, 08:51:38 AM

Please provide one sentence as to why your society is the better option in this major scientific debate. 

We are better looking.

Says the moose!

Also google.com has no dispute.

A moose is a beautiful creature 

Quote from: SkepticSoph on November 07, 2016, 08:51:38 AM

Hello! I am new here - on the fence - but favoring google. Please provide one sentence as to why your society is the better option in this major scientific debate. 

I'm sure google will be glad to meet you.

Here's one The Flat Earth vs. Globe Earth Debate!.
It starts with

Let us imagine for a minute that you were born onto this Earth having never been indoctrinated into a belief system, had no knowledge of celestial mechanics and no knowledge of astronomy or cosmology. Let us say then that I presented you with two scenarios to explain the the world in which you inhabited and they are as follows:
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
<< etc, etc >>

then finishes with

“The age old saying ‘ignorance is bliss’ withholds a mighty truth. This is not to say that a continued state of ignorance is blissful, it is rather to say that when one recognizes that one is ignorant of a subject it immediately puts them in the position to explore, with a childlike wonder, all the gems waiting to be found within the investigation.” — Claudia Pavonis

What do I believe? Do I believe the Earth is flat or do I believe it is round?

Personally I care not for beliefs. I only care about the truth and so my opinions on the matter are null and void. At the risk of sounding ignorant, I must say that I have a few key questions I personally would LOVE to see answered:

In regards to the Flat Earth / geocentric model:
. . . << read it yourself >> . . .
In regards to the Heliocentric Model:
. . .  << read it yourself >>  . . .
I am fully at peace knowing that there is so much that I will never know about this world.

And that is ok because I know the most important thing…

I know myself.

Peace and love everyone,
Marty

“I know that I am intelligent because I know that I know nothing.” — Socrates

Just might be worth a read.

Quote from: Space Cowgirl on November 07, 2016, 09:06:36 AM

Quote from: SkepticSoph on November 07, 2016, 08:51:38 AM

Hello! I am new here - on the fence - but favoring google. Please provide one sentence as to why your society is the better option in this major scientific debate. 

I'm sure google will be glad to meet you.

Here's one The Flat Earth vs. Globe Earth Debate!.
It starts with

Quote from: Marty Leeds

Let us imagine for a minute that you were born onto this Earth having never been indoctrinated into a belief system, had no knowledge of celestial mechanics and no knowledge of astronomy or cosmology. Let us say then that I presented you with two scenarios to explain the the world in which you inhabited and they are as follows:
. . . . . . . . . . . . .
<< etc, etc >>

then finishes with

Quote

“The age old saying ‘ignorance is bliss’ withholds a mighty truth. This is not to say that a continued state of ignorance is blissful, it is rather to say that when one recognizes that one is ignorant of a subject it immediately puts them in the position to explore, with a childlike wonder, all the gems waiting to be found within the investigation.” — Claudia Pavonis

What do I believe? Do I believe the Earth is flat or do I believe it is round?

Personally I care not for beliefs. I only care about the truth and so my opinions on the matter are null and void. At the risk of sounding ignorant, I must say that I have a few key questions I personally would LOVE to see answered:

In regards to the Flat Earth / geocentric model:
. . . << read it yourself >> . . .
In regards to the Heliocentric Model:
. . .  << read it yourself >>  . . .
I am fully at peace knowing that there is so much that I will never know about this world.

And that is ok because I know the most important thing…

I know myself.

Peace and love everyone,
Marty

“I know that I am intelligent because I know that I know nothing.” — Socrates

Just might be worth a read.

I've actually read that before! Google'ing something, I can't remember, and ran across it.

Read ENaG