Proof of FE

1: Person A can have his home leveled parrallel to the earth
2: Person A's neighbor can level his home using the same vector
3: There exists a person in France
4: There exists a person in Romania
5: There exists an urban path between the person in France and the person in Romania
6: Each building on this path can be leveled using its neighbors vector
7: Therefore the path between France and Romania is flat
8: If the earth is round its curvature would be noticeable from France to Romania
9: Therefore the world is not round, but is flat at least where an urban path exists

Can level his home using the same vector.

It still doesn't mean that he does.

lol. sprung.

A vector works because the bubble rises to the point farthest from the ground because air naturally rises in relation to the ground in a denser substance (liquid).  If one side of the vector is closer to the ground, the bubble will go the other direction in the tube.  I cannot see how the vector example would prove the absence of curvature on the earth.

You cannot actually do so with an absolutely perfect vector.  The curvature between two points so close is only an arc of something like 0.000000000000000001 degrees.  Therefore, it is close enough that even with the curvature, they well still work at parralell planes, simply because they are so close to paralell that it is within the vectors tollerance.

I don't see how this proves FE when you cannot see Romania from France due to curvature.

You can see that the Earth is curved if you stand on a cliff and look out at the ocean - it not flat, there's a definite curve to the horizon.

I see I must dumb my proof down.. Commence dumbing:

1: The earth's curve is the total of all of its parts
2: If its parts do not add up to the sum of a complete circle, the earth is not round
3: It has been shown (see above) that there is no curve between france and romania
4: The earth is not round

You have to be an idiot to believe in a round earth...

I love all the people demanding proof of fe, then strategically avoiding this post.

What equipment would be used to level these buildings?

Whatever clever device will extend a vector from your neighbors home to your own.

I thought this has been done before? What did they use?

I have not extended a vector from france to romania, personally. Therefore this proof has no validity?

I didn't say you had...

<insert your point or counter-proof here>

This proof has no validity if nobody has done it, no...


If that's what you're asking me.

This proof has no validity if nobody has done it, no...


If that's what you're asking me.

So your saying that I'm wrong because I have not performed the above mentioned procedure?
By your "logic":
Man cannot land on the mars, despite all our science, because we have not done it. Nevermind that we have centuries of science that demonstrate how we could do it, it just cannot be done.

You see Kasroa, a proof is used to show something is true without having to do it. I understand this may be a hard concept, so I suggest you step aside and take lead from those who understand this complicated stuff.

You would think RE'ers would jump at the chance to disprove FE... Instead they just ignore the facts.

Are you blind? Can you not read a few simpel words on a screen? I'll copy and paste it for you.

This proof has no validity if nobody has done it, no...

FE Theory would state that man cannot land on Mars. Way to go!

Are you blind? Can you not read a few simpel words on a screen? I'll copy and paste it for you.

Its true I cannot read a few simpel words. How do you spell simpel? That doesn't look right.. Ug, this spelling normally is so simpel but I can't figure it out.. I'll go prove the world is round instead.

FE Theory would state that man cannot land on Mars. Way to go!

Im sorry I was dumbing it down for you. Dont you RE'ers aspire to land on mars? Next time I'll use simple shapes only to demonstrate my points.

Yeah it's a pain when someone ignores your arguments isn't it? I mean like when people point out typos instead of "inserting counterpoint here".

Yeah it's a pain when someone ignores your arguments isn't it? I mean like when people point out typos instead of "inserting counterpoint here".

Read above pls.

I'd rather you used good arguments and facts than simple shapes to be perfectly honest.

If you have a problem with my proof, present it.
Otherwise, please stop diluting my proof with your rambling.

My problem with your proof is that nobody has tried it so how does it proove anything?

Ug, are you serious? go play in the sandbox, we'll get you when we're done.

Ug? Are you a cave-man?

OMG the world IS round!!!

Glad you finally saw sense.