Viewing other planets.

  • 24 Replies
  • 7814 Views
?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Viewing other planets.
« on: March 16, 2007, 07:15:27 PM »
In the FE Theory, do planets generate their own light, akin to stars?

?

Zee

  • 31
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2007, 07:16:26 PM »
No, planets are just projections of Tom's ego.

?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2007, 07:18:20 PM »
Small pinpricks?

?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2007, 07:41:37 PM »
Seriously now, this should be a simple yes/no answer.  Not something directly involved with physics or anything, something that doesn't need to be answered with a question.

Come on FE'ers... >_>

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2007, 07:46:20 PM »
In the FE Theory, do planets generate their own light, akin to stars?

No.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2007, 07:47:24 PM »
So, if they do not generate their own light, how do we see them?  Do they reflect the Sun's light?

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2007, 07:49:20 PM »
So, if they do not generate their own light, how do we see them?  Do they reflect the Sun's light?

You mean the SUNS, not the SUN. In our local area alone, there are seven suns, each with its own trajectory. But yes, the planets reflect all of the suns' light.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2007, 07:51:23 PM »
Who do we know that there are seven suns, did I overlook that in Earth Not a Globe?

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2007, 07:54:22 PM »
Who do we know that there are seven suns, did I overlook that in Earth Not a Globe?

Earth Not a Globe is a Finite Circle book. I am a proponent of the Infinite Plane.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


?

Tom Bishop

Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2007, 07:56:00 PM »
Francois,

I was under the impression that there were infinite suns in the infinite plane theory. A hard number of seven does put an upsetting upper bound to the universe.

Quote
Earth Not a Globe is a Finite Circle book. I am a proponent of the Infinite Plane.

Please take a look at Robotham's book Earth Not a Globe. Robotham actually describes an Infinite Plane Earth.

?

Zee

  • 31
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2007, 07:56:12 PM »
Mhm... lets kick you over the edge of the ice wall, Francine.

?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2007, 07:56:18 PM »
What?  That seems rather unrelated to my question, which I'll repeat.  Sorry by the way for mixing up who and how in the previous post of mine.

Q: How do we know that there are seven suns?

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2007, 07:56:47 PM »
Francois,

I was under the impression that there were infinite suns in the infinite plane theory. A hard number of seven does put an upper bound on the imagination.

Quote
Earth Not a Globe is a Finite Circle book. I am a proponent of the Infinite Plane.

Please take a look at Robotham's book. He actually describes an Infinite Plane Earth.

Tom: I mean seven suns in our local area. The number of suns illuminating the Infinite Plane is, of course, infinity.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2007, 07:57:33 PM »
Francois,

I was under the impression that there were infinite suns in the infinite plane theory. A hard number of seven does put an upper bound on the imagination.

Quote
Earth Not a Globe is a Finite Circle book. I am a proponent of the Infinite Plane.

Please take a look at Robotham's book. He actually describes an Infinite Plane Earth.

Tom: I mean seven suns in our local area. The number of suns illuminating the Infinite Plane is, of course, infinity.
How do we know that there are seven suns?

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2007, 08:00:05 PM »
Francois,

I was under the impression that there were infinite suns in the infinite plane theory. A hard number of seven does put an upper bound on the imagination.

Quote
Earth Not a Globe is a Finite Circle book. I am a proponent of the Infinite Plane.

Please take a look at Robotham's book. He actually describes an Infinite Plane Earth.

Tom: I mean seven suns in our local area. The number of suns illuminating the Infinite Plane is, of course, infinity.
How do we know that there are seven suns?

From mathematical calculations regarding the size and distance of the average sun, as well as the size of our local area, and the discovery of seven Earth Pockets in total in our local area.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


?

Zee

  • 31
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2007, 08:00:39 PM »
I don't suppose you've got proof of this, Francine?

?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2007, 08:02:36 PM »
Francois,

I was under the impression that there were infinite suns in the infinite plane theory. A hard number of seven does put an upper bound on the imagination.

Quote
Earth Not a Globe is a Finite Circle book. I am a proponent of the Infinite Plane.

Please take a look at Robotham's book. He actually describes an Infinite Plane Earth.

Tom: I mean seven suns in our local area. The number of suns illuminating the Infinite Plane is, of course, infinity.
How do we know that there are seven suns?

From mathematical calculations regarding the size and distance of the average sun, as well as the size of our local area, and the discovery of seven Earth Pockets in total in our local area.
Can you link me to these calculations, please?  Also, where are the Earth Pockets in our local area?

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2007, 08:06:35 PM »
The Earth Pockets (this is only one term used to designate the places where the suns set) are all located close to the Ice Wall, obviously. Although there is a scientific hypothesis that the locations have moved slightly due to changes in landmasses, tectonic plates, etc.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2007, 08:07:27 PM »
That makes sense.

Now, can you provide me with those calculations?

?

Tom Bishop

Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #19 on: March 16, 2007, 08:24:23 PM »
Quote
That makes sense.

Samuel Birley Robotham actually describes an Earth as an infinite plane beyond the Ice Wall in his work Earth Not a Globe. This FAQ of this forum adopts the Accelerating Coin model, a bastardized finite plane model which came out in the 60's.

Illustration: http://i16.tinypic.com/2h5mqgk.png

In my opinion the Infinite Plane is actually the purest of the Flat Earth models.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2007, 08:33:11 PM by Tom Bishop »

?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #20 on: March 16, 2007, 08:30:21 PM »
Quote
That makes sense.

Samuel Birley Robotham actually describes an Earth as an infinite plane beyond the Ice Wall in his work Earth Not a Globe. This FAQ of forum adopts the Accelerating Coin model, a bastardization which came out in the 60's.

Illustration: http://i16.tinypic.com/2h5mqgk.png

The Infinite Plane is actually the purest of the Flat Earth models.
So there are other "worlds" besides ours?  by worlds I mean other lands beyond ours that are still on the 'Infinite Plane'.

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #21 on: March 16, 2007, 08:32:31 PM »
Quote
That makes sense.

Samuel Birley Robotham actually describes an Earth as an infinite plane beyond the Ice Wall in his work Earth Not a Globe. This FAQ of forum adopts the Accelerating Coin model, a bastardization which came out in the 60's.

Illustration: http://i16.tinypic.com/2h5mqgk.png

The Infinite Plane is actually the purest of the Flat Earth models.
So there are other "worlds" besides ours?  by worlds I mean other lands beyond ours that are still on the 'Infinite Plane'.

You mean life on other planets? Why not?
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


?

Daetyrnis

  • 44
  • +0/-0
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #22 on: March 16, 2007, 09:09:52 PM »
Quote
That makes sense.

Samuel Birley Robotham actually describes an Earth as an infinite plane beyond the Ice Wall in his work Earth Not a Globe. This FAQ of forum adopts the Accelerating Coin model, a bastardization which came out in the 60's.

Illustration: http://i16.tinypic.com/2h5mqgk.png

The Infinite Plane is actually the purest of the Flat Earth models.
So there are other "worlds" besides ours?  by worlds I mean other lands beyond ours that are still on the 'Infinite Plane'.

You mean life on other planets? Why not?
No, that's not what I mean.  Tom provided a picture that suggests that there are other areas (much like our own 'local area' beyond the ice wall.  Not upwards into space, but horizontally.

Under the FE theory.

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • +0/-0
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #23 on: March 16, 2007, 10:10:15 PM »
Quote
That makes sense.

Samuel Birley Robotham actually describes an Earth as an infinite plane beyond the Ice Wall in his work Earth Not a Globe. This FAQ of forum adopts the Accelerating Coin model, a bastardization which came out in the 60's.

Illustration: http://i16.tinypic.com/2h5mqgk.png

The Infinite Plane is actually the purest of the Flat Earth models.
So there are other "worlds" besides ours?  by worlds I mean other lands beyond ours that are still on the 'Infinite Plane'.

You mean life on other planets? Why not?
No, that's not what I mean.  Tom provided a picture that suggests that there are other areas (much like our own 'local area' beyond the ice wall.  Not upwards into space, but horizontally.

Under the FE theory.

Yes, of course there are. Incidentally, I have talked about that in other threads.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


Re: Viewing other planets.
« Reply #24 on: March 16, 2007, 10:28:15 PM »
Quote
That makes sense.

Samuel Birley Robotham actually describes an Earth as an infinite plane beyond the Ice Wall in his work Earth Not a Globe. This FAQ of this forum adopts the Accelerating Coin model, a bastardized finite plane model which came out in the 60's.

Illustration: http://i16.tinypic.com/2h5mqgk.png

In my opinion the Infinite Plane is actually the purest of the Flat Earth models.



Your thoughts?