A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!

  • 51 Replies
  • 12671 Views
*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« on: March 16, 2007, 04:51:15 AM »
A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ........

Quote
Q: "Why do the all the world Governments say the Earth is round?"

A: It's a conspiracy

Q: "What about NASA? Don't they have photos to prove that the Earth is round?"

A: NASA is part of the conspiracy too. The photos are faked.
What is the motive behind this conspiracy and i dont mean that "its for money" b/s, Im talking about a realistic reason.

Quote
Q: "Why has no-one taken a photo of the Earth that proves it is flat?"

A: The government prevents people from getting close enough to the Ice Wall to take a picture.
But later in you FAQ you claim the earth is a circle disc, How do you know is a circle if no one can get close enough to see it. Also how can they possibly prevent any person from going to any remote location and looking at this ice wall?

Quote
Q: "What is the motive behind this conspiracy?"

A: The motive is unknown although it is probably money
Whos paying them this money and whats their motive behind paying all this money to all these hundreds of millions of people to keep this quiet? Not to mention you cant explain why not one of these tens of MILLIONS of people who are involved in the conspiracy has come forward to the media to expose this and earn himself millions of dollars at the same time. After all if these people are doing all this for money, Surely one of the lesser paid henchmen would come forward to expose this and claim the money he is so hungry for?

Quote
Q: "If you're not sure about the motive, why do you say there is a conspiracy?"

A: Well it's quite simple really; if the earth is in fact flat, then the governments must be lying when they say it isn't.
Well none of these so called facts seem to stand up to the test and your anwers dont provide any ACTUAL facts at all.

Quote
Q: "What is the circumference and diameter of the Earth?"

A: "Circumference: 78225 miles, Diameter: 24,900 miles
How do you know this when the government wont let you get close enough to the ice walls to measure the distance. Or are you using RE mathmatics and geography to come up with this answer?

Quote
Q: "What about the stars, sun and moon and other planets? Are they flat too? What are they made of?"

A: The sun and moon, each 32 miles in diameter, circle Earth at a height of 3000 miles at its equator, located midway between the North Pole and the ice wall. Each functions similar to a "spotlight," with the sun radiating "hot light," the moon "cold light." As they are spotlights, they only give light out over a certain are which explains why some parts of the Earth are dark when others are light. Their apparent rising and setting are caused by optical illusions.
If this is true why is the sun noticabally bigger then the moon in appearance? Example: Go put on some sunglasses and look towards the sun, Then when the moon is visable (sometimes before the sun has even set) have a look at that. You will notice the moon is smaller then the sun, But thats not possible if they are both the same size and distance from earth.


Quote
Q: "Please explain sunrises/sunsets."

A: It's a perspective effect.  Really, the sun is just getting farther away; it looks like it disappears because everything gets smaller and eventually disappears as it gets farther away.
If this were true wouldn't this mean the sun would gradually reduce in size as it moves further away?? Example: Go get a tennis ball (or basketball ect) and go roll it down a long road, You'll notice as the ball gets further and further away it looks as if reduces in size. Yet when the sun sets it does not reduce in size it remains the same size untill it dips under the horizon. Infact if the sun only got further away it would not even dip below the horizon it would remain in the sky untill it eventually just disapeared out of sight. But as you can witness with your own eyes the sun does dip below the horizon as it sets and therefore proves your theory is incorrect. Not to mention the fact that the sun dips below the horizon PROVES the same thing will happen when a boat goes over the horizon and PROVES the Earth is curved.

Quote
Q: "Why are other celestial bodies round but not the Earth?"

A: When you look at these celestial bodies, even with a telescope, they're entirely two-dimensional.
Yes this is true but if you look at any round object (basketball for example) they all look 2D, But it is FACT that they are a 3D sphere. The only thing that shows a basketball is a sphere is the curved shadows projected onto the ball. The same as how the earth casts a curved shadow on the moon (look for yourself). But i forgot its a dark disk object that creates the crescent moon (even though you can clearly see the dark side of the moon through a telescope and you cant see no dark disc object). Also the sun casts a curved shadow on the earth when it is day on one side of the earth and its night on the other, Ohh but i forgot the earth doesn't rotate around the sun, does it. HA HA HA

Quote
Q: Exactly what shape is the Earth if it's flat? Square or circle?

A: Circle, like in the UN logo
Q: How do you know the earth is round if like you stated in your FAQ the ice wall around earth is guarded by armies and you cant get close enough to see it. Does this not mean no one has see the edge of the earth? Wich intern means the Earth could be square or triangle or even a hexagon? Or is this just an assumtion of yours?

Quote
Q: "How does global warming affect the ice wall?"

A1: Global warming is melting the ice wall, but the government isn't doing anything because cutting carbon emissions would damage the economy, and they only care about making money.
But i thought the government makes its money by keeping people convinced the earth was flat? If that is true then it is pretty ovious the government doesn't care about hiding this secret and half of you theories are null and void.

Quote
Q: "What about Lunar Eclipses"

(Possible A) The moon isn't a spotlight; it glows with light from the sun, reflected off the Earth. Different parts of the Earth are more reflective than others (the seas, the polar cap, the ice wall, for example). Sometimes, the position of the sun (which is a spotlight) means that only very low-reflective or non-reflective parts of the Earth's surface are illuminated, so the moon is abnormally dark. This could potentially explain lunar phases as well.
But i thought you said both the moon and sun were spotlight earlier in you FAQ, So that would make one of these statements false.

Quote
Q: "How come the travel time by air from South America to New Zealand, via the polar route, is SHORTER than the travel time going North first and then South again?"

A: (Presumed answer: The airline pilots are misled by their GPS, or are deliberately conspiring to make it appear that the flights take different times)
"Persumed answer"? Yeah like 99% of all your answers to the questions posed.


So come on people, How can you explain these??????????????????

« Last Edit: March 16, 2007, 06:05:39 AM by Australian »

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #1 on: March 16, 2007, 04:55:36 AM »
That was brilliant actually, nice one Australian. Cant wait for Tom Bishop to come along and try and react to that!
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

Kasroa Is Gone

  • 6863
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #2 on: March 16, 2007, 04:58:37 AM »

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #3 on: March 16, 2007, 04:59:25 AM »
But they'll probably tell you read Earth: Not a globe
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

?

Kasroa Is Gone

  • 6863
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #4 on: March 16, 2007, 05:00:10 AM »
Yeah they probably will.

*

unclegravy

  • 957
  • +0/-0
  • I feel so fucking high!!!!!!
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #5 on: March 16, 2007, 05:06:39 AM »
A nice, clean thread.

And some questions I didn't even think of asking.
Quote
The people who feast on exclamation marks will never go hungry agaaaain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #6 on: March 16, 2007, 05:09:03 AM »
yeah he's got some good questions. Really hope TheEngineer or someone like that sees this thread. I want answers as well!
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #7 on: March 16, 2007, 05:26:11 AM »
I cant wait to hear their explanations for these questions.

*

Colonel Gaydafi

  • Spam Moderator
  • Planar Moderator
  • 65234
  • +17/-49
  • Queen of the gays!
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #8 on: March 16, 2007, 05:28:08 AM »
Probably gonna have to wait quite a while considering what time it is in America
Quote from: WardoggKC130FE
If Gayer doesn't remember you, you might as well do yourself a favor and become an hero.
Quote from: Raa
there is a difference between touching a muff and putting your hand into it isn't there?

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #9 on: March 16, 2007, 10:01:28 AM »
*Bump*


?

Curiously

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #10 on: March 16, 2007, 10:02:47 AM »
Good luck, I'm not getting much feed back on my similar post on the FAQ... :D

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #11 on: March 16, 2007, 10:30:37 AM »
wow
its like deja vu...
Yeah i know what you mean, I could swear i have seen other completely useless posts by you.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2007, 09:50:20 PM by Australian »

*

unclegravy

  • 957
  • +0/-0
  • I feel so fucking high!!!!!!
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #12 on: March 16, 2007, 10:43:38 AM »
No, he's talking about the apparent lack of an answer by a believer of a flat earth theory. Or shoudl I say "believer".
Quote
The people who feast on exclamation marks will never go hungry agaaaain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #13 on: March 16, 2007, 10:48:32 AM »
No, he's talking about the apparent lack of an answer by a believer of a flat earth theory. Or shoudl I say "believer".
LMFAO, Ohh my bad. I thought he was talking about the abundance of threads about the FAQ.

*

Rudd Master 3000

  • 452
  • +0/-0
  • Lil Kev
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #14 on: March 16, 2007, 11:37:20 AM »
Why does anybody bother arguing against the flat earthers?

Think about it:
-Nobody believes the earth is flat

-If you think of a good argument you'll just be ignored

-You can come across as a right idiot as most round earthers do

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #15 on: March 16, 2007, 04:57:04 PM »
Why does anybody bother arguing against the flat earthers?

It can be entertaining at times, which makes it totally worthwhile.

*

Rudd Master 3000

  • 452
  • +0/-0
  • Lil Kev
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #16 on: March 16, 2007, 05:16:17 PM »
Why does anybody bother arguing against the flat earthers?

It can be entertaining at times, which makes it totally worthwhile.

You find it enetertaining despite the fact that nobody believes in a flat earth?

Most of the comments I read by round earthers are OMG FEers = STOOPID LOL!!! Is that the entertainment value? Kidding yourself that people actually believe in a flat earth.

*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #17 on: March 16, 2007, 07:22:49 PM »
Ricotta cheese
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #18 on: March 16, 2007, 09:40:05 PM »
No, he's talking about the apparent lack of an answer by a believer of a flat earth theory. Or shoudl I say "believer".
LMFAO, Ohh my bad. I thought he was talking about the abundance of threads about the FAQ.
I was.
Well then statement put back up!!!

I find it funny that these people so blatenly belive in  this b/s, But when gaps and inconsistencies are found in there FAQ they avoid the thread and dont answer the questions put to them. I mean there are a few things in their FAQ wich basicallly disproves their whole FE theory, So why cant they answer these questions? All im trying to do is get clarafication on a few things, But now i have noticed if the FE people dont have the answers they avoid the questions completely. Questions that can be answered by any scientist who KNOWS the earth is round.
« Last Edit: March 16, 2007, 09:47:37 PM by Australian »

?

joffenz

  • The Elder Ones
  • 1272
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #19 on: March 17, 2007, 07:08:51 AM »
Australian, it is good to see you have put effort into finding flaws in FE theory.

With regards to the conspiracy -

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=6308.0

The actualy number of people in on the conspiracy is much less than you claimed it was. Some other points answered there as well.


I'll reply to the rest of your post when I have time.


*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #20 on: March 17, 2007, 08:39:53 AM »
Australian, it is good to see you have put effort into finding flaws in FE theory.

With regards to the conspiracy -

http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=6308.0

The actualy number of people in on the conspiracy is much less than you claimed it was. Some other points answered there as well.


I'll reply to the rest of your post when I have time.


Thanks for taking the time to answer, Because it seems alot of other FE's have avoided this thread even though i raised many valid points.
Anyway over a period of 200 years that number WOULD be as high as i said it would,  Because they would have to hire and bribe new people EVERY generation because you cant have 100 year olds guarding a ice wall. They have to be young and fit indivituals. Not to mention you can not claim to know the number of people involved in this conspiracy if you dont know and cannot prove there is a conspiracy.

What i wrote about the sun and how FE's claim it doesn't set but mearly gets further away disproves your entir theory. Because as i said if the sun just got further away it wouldn't sink below the horizon it would mearly keep reducing in size untill it vanished out of sight. But it doesn't it remains the same size untill it sinks below the horizon and any of you can veiw this with your own eye's any day of your life.

?

tardface

Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #21 on: March 17, 2007, 08:52:02 AM »
1. You got a reason, but you don't believe it. However, you blindly believe what the governement tells you.

2. Do you not think that the governement has agents to stop anyone who wants to leak?

3. It is very hard to come across actual facts when the governement are so very powerful, and hides it so very well.

4. Maths and logics.

If this is true why is the sun noticabally bigger then the moon in appearance? Example: Go put on some sunglasses and look towards the sun, Then when the moon is visable (sometimes before the sun has even set) have a look at that. You will notice the moon is smaller then the sun, But thats not possible if they are both the same size and distance from earth.

5. Perspective difference. ;)

6. The sun and the moon are very big, and your eyes probably just fail. And no, it doesn't prove anything.

7. Look further down in the FAQ. Keep in mind that it's very hard do figure out what the governement is hiding from us.

8. The UN is part of the governement. They leaked this vital information through their flag.

9. That's not really a valid argument, since they're not willing to cut one expense to keep another up. That would just result in less money for them.

I cba going through the rest of your governement-based arguments. Anyone can see that you are, as a fact, wrong in everything you say.

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #22 on: March 17, 2007, 09:10:12 AM »
1. You got a reason, but you don't believe it. However, you blindly believe what the governement tells you.

2. Do you not think that the governement has agents to stop anyone who wants to leak?

3. It is very hard to come across actual facts when the governement are so very powerful, and hides it so very well.

4. Maths and logics.

If this is true why is the sun noticabally bigger then the moon in appearance? Example: Go put on some sunglasses and look towards the sun, Then when the moon is visable (sometimes before the sun has even set) have a look at that. You will notice the moon is smaller then the sun, But thats not possible if they are both the same size and distance from earth.

5. Perspective difference. ;)

6. The sun and the moon are very big, and your eyes probably just fail. And no, it doesn't prove anything.

7. Look further down in the FAQ. Keep in mind that it's very hard do figure out what the governement is hiding from us.

8. The UN is part of the governement. They leaked this vital information through their flag.

9. That's not really a valid argument, since they're not willing to cut one expense to keep another up. That would just result in less money for them.

I cba going through the rest of your governement-based arguments. Anyone can see that you are, as a fact, wrong in everything you say.
You fail. You use opinion and not facts where as my points are all facts that can be proven with your own eyes or simple experiments that a baby could conduct (i made it easy for you FE's). But dont tell me this b/s about "your eyes could lie", Thats the most retarded thing ever. So my eyes can lie and some tool who wrote a book 200 years ago for money cant???

Dont quit your day job.

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #23 on: March 17, 2007, 11:10:04 PM »
So you cant answer these question put to you about the inconsistencies in you FAQ. But you still blindly believe what you are told by some redneck?

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #24 on: March 17, 2007, 11:25:37 PM »
1. You got a reason, but you don't believe it. However, you blindly believe what the governement tells you.

2. Do you not think that the governement has agents to stop anyone who wants to leak?

3. It is very hard to come across actual facts when the governement are so very powerful, and hides it so very well.

4. Maths and logics.

If this is true why is the sun noticabally bigger then the moon in appearance? Example: Go put on some sunglasses and look towards the sun, Then when the moon is visable (sometimes before the sun has even set) have a look at that. You will notice the moon is smaller then the sun, But thats not possible if they are both the same size and distance from earth.

5. Perspective difference. ;)

6. The sun and the moon are very big, and your eyes probably just fail. And no, it doesn't prove anything.

7. Look further down in the FAQ. Keep in mind that it's very hard do figure out what the governement is hiding from us.

8. The UN is part of the governement. They leaked this vital information through their flag.

9. That's not really a valid argument, since they're not willing to cut one expense to keep another up. That would just result in less money for them.

I cba going through the rest of your governement-based arguments. Anyone can see that you are, as a fact, wrong in everything you say.
1- I believe what science and experiments prove, I have never listened to the government once and i have never heard them outthere trying to prove to me it is round. Its just common sense.

2- What are these the so called men in black who also hide aliens existence, Because these people must have psycic powers to be able to predict who will leak this information and then stop it before it happens.

3- More "but its teh goverments" crap, your brain must hide from your spinal cord very well because you seem to have the logic ao a 2 year old.

4- An example of these maths sums and logics would be nice, I asked for PROOF not for people to say its simple logic and not even provide any "simple logic" to back that up.

5 & 6- Perspective difference? Please explain? Because if you go get two basket balls the exact same size 20 metres away they both look exactly the same size. Not to mention you say "your eyes probally just fail" and "perspective difference" when both these could be applied to your "Buts teh earth looks flat from up close" utter crap you spill.

7- I read your whole fact and it proves about as much as people syaing "ohh but the government is hiding aliens existence and they cooperate with them".

*- You fail again. See the UN nedded a logo that represents all the countries worlwide that are in the UN, Since they cant have a 3D logo that spins around printed up on banners, They created a world map that makes every UN country visable by using the same technique used in any 2D map of the world or any map that isn't on a globe.

Example-

9- All of my points are valid arguments but so far you've done nothing to prove your arguments but say, "well we cant find a reasons to support what we say, So we will just blame the government and say they are hiding stuff".

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #25 on: March 18, 2007, 09:09:11 AM »
Bump

Avoid it all you want i will keep bumping it.

*

Rudd Master 3000

  • 452
  • +0/-0
  • Lil Kev
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #26 on: March 18, 2007, 10:29:29 AM »
Why should we listen to you? Australia doesn't exist.

?

FEIPS

  • 175
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #27 on: March 18, 2007, 02:59:10 PM »
Why should we listen to you? Australia doesn't exist.

Because the kangaroos will invade Indonesia if Australia doesn't exist!  :-X
Flat. Earth. Is. Psuedo. Science.

FEIPS

?

Kom Incense

  • 54
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #28 on: March 18, 2007, 05:54:57 PM »
nobody here believes the earth is flat.

they simply enjoy watching people argue silly topics
Nah.

*

Australian

  • 34
  • +0/-0
Re: A FEW INCONSISTENCIES IN YOUR FAQ!
« Reply #29 on: March 18, 2007, 11:51:59 PM »
The fact that these people wont account for the obvious oversights in their FAQ proves they are so full of shit and they have no explination for this crap theory.