United Nations: hiding the truth in plain sight

It is often said that planting something in plain sight is the best way to hide it.

Behold:



Isn't it strange that the United Nations, one of the co-conspirators in the Round Earthist religion, has a FLAT EARTH MAP as its symbol?

Strange or... just hiding the truth in plain sight?

i simply see it as looking down at the very top of our globe, showing the positions of the continents in where they would be on the globe .. though it takes a LIL bit of imagination, (i think FEers are required to have this right?) you can easily wrap your mind around seeings the picture as a global like shape, though it is 2D ..

It is often said that planting something in plain sight is the best way to hide it.

Behold:



Isn't it strange that the United Nations, one of the co-conspirators in the Round Earthist religion, has a FLAT EARTH MAP as its symbol?

Strange or... just hiding the truth in plain sight?

A map of a round earth isn't proof, so why is one of a flat earth.

What's funny is your belief of an infinite plane disagrees with that map.

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 15, 2007, 12:28:59 AM

It is often said that planting something in plain sight is the best way to hide it.

Behold:



Isn't it strange that the United Nations, one of the co-conspirators in the Round Earthist religion, has a FLAT EARTH MAP as its symbol?

Strange or... just hiding the truth in plain sight?

A map of a round earth isn't proof, so why is one of a flat earth.

What's funny is your belief of an infinite plane disagrees with that map.

No... the United Nations does not rule over the whole Earth (for that would be impossible). It only rules over the local area. Thus it has only reason to display said local area.

So our local area, and the ice wall, which that map doesn't show, is a perfect (obviously not exactly perfect) circle?

The united nationt includes countries from all over the world. It would be inpossible to show them all on a 3D globe picture.

So our local area, and the ice wall, which that map doesn't show, is a perfect (obviously not exactly perfect) circle?

That is a strong possibility.

Quote from: rolli on March 15, 2007, 03:07:27 AM

So our local area, and the ice wall, which that map doesn't show, is a perfect (obviously not exactly perfect) circle?

That is a strong possibility.

So if, another one of these "areas," were next to our "area," wouldn't there be large holes where the circles don't touch?

The united nationt includes countries from all over the world. It would be inpossible to show them all on a 3D globe picture.

So you acknowledge that Round Earthism cannot be represented, and thus is a sham? Interesting.

What? not at all. I acknowledge that the earth is three dimensional and if you look at it from only one angle then you can't see the other side.

And now you deny what you plainly said. Interesting...

though since it's a sphere it could be unwrapped section at a time and this would mak e a rectanglish picture, you could also take the viewpoint of the top, making everything but the continents transparent, and scrunch the picture in order to give some kind of 2D "depth" to the placement of the continents .. not too hard ^^

And now you deny what you plainly said. Interesting...

I'm not denying anything! I said "picture"!!! Do you know what a PICTURE is?! It's 2 dimensional. You can't see the arctic an australia and the USA and the UK at the same time!

m888, stop evading. You said:

"The united nationt includes countries from all over the world. It would be inpossible to show them all on a 3D globe picture."

Clearly meaning that displaying all countries on a globe was impossible, and that the Round Earth model is contradictory.

no ? it's possible, u just have to spin it in order to see the other continents, fascinating isn't it ?

m888, stop evading. You said:

"The united nationt includes countries from all over the world. It would be inpossible to show them all on a 3D globe picture."

Clearly meaning that displaying all countries on a globe was impossible, and that the Round Earth model is contradictory.

I'n that case, maybe you could describe the word "picture" to me?

you gotta give francois cremebroulais some credit: he's consitent...

oooohh man i like cremebroulais!

So, Francois, you are saying that if it is impossible to display all countries on earth on a globe so that they are visible at the same time, that proves that the earth isn't a globe? You ARE high.

Blaaargh, yee blasphemers... if teh earth was flat, how can so be people av sailed round teh southpole aye???
tis blasphemy what yee preach Fransois 


This post was sponsored by: Aunt-Margrets lovely baked pies

Dude. Your name is such a ripoff.

you gotta give francois cremebroulais some credit: he's consitant...

Consistently stupid it seems

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 15, 2007, 03:22:12 AM

m888, stop evading. You said:

"The united nationt includes countries from all over the world. It would be inpossible to show them all on a 3D globe picture."

Clearly meaning that displaying all countries on a globe was impossible, and that the Round Earth model is contradictory.

I'n that case, maybe you could describe the word "picture" to me?

Great, now they're resorting to the Bill Clinton technique. "Define what 'is' is..."

You make no sense Francois and you keep avoiding answering questions

You make no sense Francois and you keep avoiding answering questions

If you had more than a second grade reading comprehension, you'd understand I was referring to the time when Bill Clinton evaded a question by asking what "is" means. Or perhaps you are too young to have heard about this. Either way, you are not worth anyone's time.

I'm talking about you not making any sense earlier.

And way to make an assumption about my age and reading comprehension. I am worth people's time actually.

oh that's nice isn't it? poor gayer..

Yeah poor me, being insulted by an idiotic nutcase troll, I feel so sad.

Completely worthless troll. Get out of my thread.

I'll get out of your thread if you apologise.