Flat-Earthers, can you explain this?

As a response to this thread: http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=11525.0

So how do you explain this, Flat Earthers? This is plain and undeniable proof that magic exists.

As you can see with your own eyes, there is no trick to it, it's real magic.

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, officially declare you a maroon. I further officially declare that there is a vast difference, indeed an unsurmountable gulch of difference, between a profound statement of metaphysical expression and a mere magic trick.

Thus I have spoken!

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, officially declare you a maroon. I further officially declare that there is a vast difference, indeed an unsurmountable gulch of difference, between a profound statement of metaphysical expression and a mere magic trick.

Thus I have spoken!

Not in the way you presented it in the other thread. You merely wrote "As you can see with your own eyes, this image proves the flat-earth theory!". And now I'm using your logic; As you can see with your own eyes, this video proves that magic exists.

Quote from: Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane on March 16, 2007, 01:29:40 AM

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, officially declare you a maroon. I further officially declare that there is a vast difference, indeed an unsurmountable gulch of difference, between a profound statement of metaphysical expression and a mere magic trick.

Thus I have spoken!

Not in the way you presented it in the other thread. You merely wrote "As you can see with your own eyes, this image proves the flat-earth theory!". And now I'm using your logic; As you can see with your own eyes, this video proves that magic exists.

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, declare that you fail to grasp the difference between superficial meaning and depth of thought. The video presents magic as a brute fact. My image presents the FE v RE debate at a profound conceptual level.

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, declare that you fail to grasp the difference between superficial meaning and depth of thought. The video presents magic as a brute fact. My image presents the FE v RE debate at a profound conceptual level.

You mean I fail to grasp the difference between your fantasies and your imaginations? Also, you presented the image in the other thread as the flat earth being a brute fact, which is no different to my video which proves that magic exists, finite.

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, declare that you don't understand the meaning of "presenting something as a brute fact," as opposed to an approach characterized by sophistication, because you would not indeed know sophistication if it hit you on the head with a 2x4.

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, declare that you don't understand the meaning of "presenting something as a brute fact," as opposed to an approach characterized by sophistication, because you would not indeed know sophistication if it hit you on the head with a 2x4.

You obviously lack something in your head.
Your presentation in the other thread are no different from mine in this thread. That's nothing you can change as we presented our ideas in the same logic.

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, am offended!

I, Francois Tremblay, of the Infinite Plane, officially declare you a maroon.

I, Daetyrnis, declare you a burgundy.