Did I get this right?

  • 46 Replies
  • 7871 Views
*

unclegravy

  • 957
  • I feel so fucking high!!!!!!
Did I get this right?
« on: March 12, 2007, 02:45:00 AM »
Correct me if I'm wrong regarding any of these points about the FE model:
-the atmosphere is kept on earth by the 150 foot ice wall. therefore, the atmosphere is 150 feet high.
-the "the hull of a ship disappears before the mast does" phenomenon is caused by the bending of light.
-the sun and moon have "gravity", but the earth does not.
-the earth is the only thing in space without gravity.
-earth is not a planet (since it does not orbit anything).

This thread is just for clarification regarding some things not found in the faq. I thank you for your time.
Quote
The people who feast on exclamation marks will never go hungry agaaaain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • Extra Racist
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #1 on: March 12, 2007, 09:24:44 AM »
lol stop asking hard questions.  Thats why none of them posted in here. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

Tom Bishop

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #2 on: March 12, 2007, 09:34:24 AM »
Quote
-the atmosphere is kept on earth by the 150 foot ice wall. therefore, the atmosphere is 150 feet high.

Nope, the atmosphere extends to several hundred miles.

Quote
-the "the hull of a ship disappears before the mast does" phenomenon is caused by the bending of light.

The mechanism is accurately described in Chapter 14 of Earth Not a Globe:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za32.htm

Quote
-the sun and moon have "gravity", but the earth does not.

The earth has gravitation vis-a-vis the Equivalence Principle.

Quote
-the earth is the only thing in space without gravity.

The earth has gravitation vis-a-vis the Equivalence Principle.

Quote
-earth is not a planet (since it does not orbit anything).

The earth is a planet. Those other celestial bodies are not.

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #3 on: March 12, 2007, 03:13:30 PM »
Go go gadget bullshit!!

*

unclegravy

  • 957
  • I feel so fucking high!!!!!!
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #4 on: March 12, 2007, 04:34:39 PM »
Quote
-the atmosphere is kept on earth by the 150 foot ice wall. therefore, the atmosphere is 150 feet high.

Nope, the atmosphere extends to several hundred miles.
TheEngineer stated that the ice wall did the trick, and so did you in a certain topic.

Quote
-the "the hull of a ship disappears before the mast does" phenomenon is caused by the bending of light.

The mechanism is accurately described in Chapter 14 of Earth Not a Globe:

http://www.sacred-texts.com/earth/za/za32.htm

Quote
-the sun and moon have "gravity", but the earth does not.

The earth has gravitation vis-a-vis the Equivalence Principle.
I know. I just wanted verification that you think the other celestial bodies do. Or if you sdon't, for that matter.
Quote
-the earth is the only thing in space without gravity.

The earth has gravitation vis-a-vis the Equivalence Principle.
I know the difference between gravitation and gravity, Tom. You're not verifying these points in any way.

Quote
-earth is not a planet (since it does not orbit anything).

The earth is a planet. Those other celestial bodies are not.
"Planet" is greek (or was that latin? Nvm) for "wanderer" and was named such because they thought it had an orbit. So, the others are planets, and the earth is not. Is that right, now?

Ok, now I want a REAL FE'er to answer, please.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2007, 04:59:32 PM by unclegravy »
Quote
The people who feast on exclamation marks will never go hungry agaaaain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

?

GeoGuy

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #5 on: March 12, 2007, 06:02:50 PM »
-the atmosphere is kept on earth by the 150 foot ice wall. therefore, the atmosphere is 150 feet high.
This is not entirely correct. Some FE's believe the ice wall to be much higher than that. Possibly many thousands of feet.
Quote
-the "the hull of a ship disappears before the mast does" phenomenon is caused by the bending of light.
Incorrect. The hull of a ship does not, in fact, disappear before the mast. But if it did, the explanation given in EnaG is perfectly plausible.
Quote
-the sun and moon have "gravity", but the earth does not.
Many FE's believe this, yes.
Quote
-the earth is the only thing in space without gravity.
Quite possibly.
Quote
-earth is not a planet (since it does not orbit anything).
See Tom's reply.
« Last Edit: March 12, 2007, 06:05:34 PM by GeoGuy »

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • Meep.
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #6 on: March 12, 2007, 08:57:31 PM »
TheEngineer stated that the ice wall did the trick, and so did you in a certain topic.
The atmosphere creates a sort of dome-like bubble over the top of the planet. It's only partially held up by the ice wall--as well it's held up by surface tension and acceleration.

Quote
I know the difference between gravitation and gravity, Tom. You're not verifying these points in any way.
So what if the Earth is the only thing without gravity? Does it make a difference?

Quote
"Planet" is greek (or was that latin? Nvm) for "wanderer" and was named such because they thought it had an orbit. So, the others are planets, and the earth is not. Is that right, now?
It also comes somewhat from the word "Plane" which is to soar. That doesn't mean that planes are named so much because they soar through the air all the time. Planet is named from the word "to wander" not because they believed it orbited something else (they weren't aware of that in Greece--I believe they had geocentric beliefs even though they may have believed it to be round), but most likely for alterior reasons. One that I could think of would be that it has to do with plane--which comes from planen, which translates into "soaring" as well as "wandering." It could mean that they assumed the planet was flat like a plane (a plane referring to a geometrical plane).
If you have reason to believe that the derivation is assuredly referring to the Earth's orbit, I'd like to see a source that led you to think that.

~D-Draw

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #7 on: March 12, 2007, 08:58:50 PM »

TheEngineer stated that the ice wall did the trick

I never said anything of the kind.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #8 on: March 12, 2007, 09:25:38 PM »
Correct me if I'm wrong regarding any of these points about the FE model:
-the atmosphere is kept on earth by the 150 foot ice wall. therefore, the atmosphere is 150 feet high.
-the "the hull of a ship disappears before the mast does" phenomenon is caused by the bending of light.
-the sun and moon have "gravity", but the earth does not.
-the earth is the only thing in space without gravity.
-earth is not a planet (since it does not orbit anything).

This thread is just for clarification regarding some things not found in the faq. I thank you for your time.

Only if you follow the government conspiracy, fake-FE model proposed by this board.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #9 on: March 12, 2007, 09:40:15 PM »
i've never had it cross my mind that the government was behind me thinking the earth is round..  basic science classes and science tv programs have told me MORE than enough to know that the earth is round, how can you contradict so many people that know the earth is round, with more hard evidence and proof then you FEers could EVER unearth?  It just doesn't make sense, it's almost like you're all stubborn kids that don't want to conform just because everyone is saying it, well hey, everyone knows the earth is round, it's time to jump on the bandwagon
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #10 on: March 12, 2007, 10:20:55 PM »
i've never had it cross my mind that the government was behind me thinking the earth is round..  basic science classes and science tv programs have told me MORE than enough to know that the earth is round, how can you contradict so many people that know the earth is round, with more hard evidence and proof then you FEers could EVER unearth?  It just doesn't make sense, it's almost like you're all stubborn kids that don't want to conform just because everyone is saying it, well hey, everyone knows the earth is round, it's time to jump on the bandwagon

Actually, 56% of the world population believes the Earth is flat.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #11 on: March 12, 2007, 10:22:34 PM »
where do u get these numbers ?
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #12 on: March 12, 2007, 10:31:19 PM »
where do u get these numbers ?

From the New Scientist, April 2005 edition, page 12.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #13 on: March 12, 2007, 10:32:02 PM »
lol is this a real poll or just a conspiracy article for the FEers ?
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #14 on: March 12, 2007, 10:36:35 PM »
btw can u cite this pls ? i've been trying to find it but cant
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #15 on: March 12, 2007, 10:47:19 PM »
i've never had it cross my mind that the government was behind me thinking the earth is round..  basic science classes and science tv programs have told me MORE than enough to know that the earth is round, how can you contradict so many people that know the earth is round, with more hard evidence and proof then you FEers could EVER unearth?  It just doesn't make sense, it's almost like you're all stubborn kids that don't want to conform just because everyone is saying it, well hey, everyone knows the earth is round, it's time to jump on the bandwagon
^Proof the conspiracy is working like a charm!

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #16 on: March 12, 2007, 10:55:17 PM »
i've never had it cross my mind that the government was behind me thinking the earth is round..  basic science classes and science tv programs have told me MORE than enough to know that the earth is round, how can you contradict so many people that know the earth is round, with more hard evidence and proof then you FEers could EVER unearth?  It just doesn't make sense, it's almost like you're all stubborn kids that don't want to conform just because everyone is saying it, well hey, everyone knows the earth is round, it's time to jump on the bandwagon
^Proof the conspiracy is working like a charm!

this is so NOT proof ? why does the media always have to be utterly tied to teh government ? that alone doens't make sense
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

*

Franc T., Planar

  • 1051
  • Leader of the Planar Army, Republic of Canada
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #17 on: March 12, 2007, 10:55:28 PM »
Look, if you're going to argue against New Scientist, there's nothing more I can do for you buddy.
Broadcasting live from the Republic of Canada!
 
They say death and taxes are the only two absolutes. Actually, they're only half right.


*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #18 on: March 12, 2007, 11:08:42 PM »
The media is not tied to the government (though MANY argue otherwise...) with regards to the conspiracy; the media simply believes the information being supplied by sources claiming the Earth to be round.  Even these sources don't have to be in on the conspiracy.  Instead, these sources already believe the Earth to be round and thus never even consider the possibility that it is flat. 

As is well described in "The Conspiracy Compendium," the government is not "in" on the conspiracy, rather the conspiracy is in the government. The conspiracy is made of a relatively small group of specialists. 

Please refer to said thread if you want to continue this discussion. 

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #19 on: March 12, 2007, 11:12:10 PM »
The media is not tied to the government (though MANY argue otherwise...) with regards to the conspiracy; the media simply believes the information being supplied by sources claiming the Earth to be round.  Even these sources don't have to be in on the conspiracy.  Instead, these sources already believe the Earth to be round and thus never even consider the possibility that it is flat. 

As is well described in "The Conspiracy Compendium," the government is not "in" on the conspiracy, rather the conspiracy is in the government. The conspiracy is made of a relatively small group of specialists. 

Please refer to said thread if you want to continue this discussion. 

what about all the people having nothign to do w/the gov't and doing private tests ? surely some of the information we have are from these scientists and not just those affiliated w/gov't and conspiracy
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #20 on: March 12, 2007, 11:13:19 PM »
Look, if you're going to argue against New Scientist, there's nothing more I can do for you buddy.

again, cite this or xerox or something, because i could go into downtown hawaii right now, take a poll on how many ppl believe the earth is round or flat, i gurantee you, there would be none saying it's flat
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #21 on: March 12, 2007, 11:17:06 PM »
Quote
Actually, 56% of the world population believes the Earth is flat.

crock of shit. I checked the site for New Scientist, no such article. let alone there being any statistics.

*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #22 on: March 12, 2007, 11:17:33 PM »
Please refer to said thread if you want to continue this discussion. 
Let's not drag Unclegravy's topic down. 

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #23 on: March 12, 2007, 11:19:22 PM »
Please refer to said thread if you want to continue this discussion. 
Let's not drag Unclegravy's topic down. 

let's not dodge your explanations because of a topic that was posted yesterday, obviously this topic has become one of discussion, shutup
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #24 on: March 12, 2007, 11:28:51 PM »
Stop being lazy and read the thread about the conspiracy.  I'm not going to hold your hand or spoon feed you; do it your damn self. 

I don't know what yesterday has to do with your justification, but your request to shut up is a great idea to stop digression. 

Look, if you're going to argue against New Scientist, there's nothing more I can do for you buddy.
^This guy is a troll.  Ignore him please. 
« Last Edit: March 12, 2007, 11:30:27 PM by EvilToothpaste »

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #25 on: March 12, 2007, 11:30:48 PM »
lol do u wish me to create a new topic then ? fine
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows

*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #26 on: March 12, 2007, 11:35:37 PM »
No.  But I do wish you luck in getting a response from anyone but trolls. 

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #27 on: March 12, 2007, 11:37:10 PM »
Quote
Stop being lazy and read the thread about the conspiracy

and where the fuck is there proof for this so-called conspiracy, huh?
oh, thats right. you made that up. how could i have forgotten.

if your going to make shit up, at least make it plausible. really. all you have is "were not sure what it is yet"...think for a second; what the hell difference would it make if the higher powers made you think the world was flat or sphere? (even though it IS sphere). tell me, how would that get them any money, huh?

*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #28 on: March 12, 2007, 11:39:32 PM »
Stop being lazy and read the thread about the conspiracy.  I'm not going to hold your hand or spoon feed you; do it your damn self. 

Re: Did I get this right?
« Reply #29 on: March 12, 2007, 11:43:24 PM »
the REASON we dont read these posts is cuz frankly, i've read so many posts inb/w along w/your faq to show that your conspiracy reasonings are complete BS and that your threads have no credibility or are even worth looking into
With no south pole, there is no electromagnetism, giving us no protection from the sun's harmful radiation--we'd all be dead right now.
The ice wall, supposedly made up of antartica lies around the edge of the earth, why no one has recorded it, who knows