How the Universe Came About.

What is the most widely accepted theory of this by FEers?

The Big Bang.

The Big Bang.

Question:
If you refer to the Asteroids and Comets thread you will see a picture of what, in very layman's terms, the Big Bang would look like. My question is, how could anything be travelling faster or at a higher acceleration than anything else for anything to get up ahead of earth?

Quote from: TheEngineer on March 06, 2007, 01:03:59 PM

The Big Bang.

Question:
If you refer to the Asteroids and Comets thread you will see a picture of what, in very layman's terms, the Big Bang would look like. My question is, how could anything be travelling faster or at a higher acceleration than anything else for anything to get up ahead of earth?

collisions, varying amounts of pressure to create the force, gravitational pull from slower, larger objects etc

well us RE would say gravity. FE would say "because it is like that *follow some made up reason*"

Quote from: _MarquisDeSade on March 07, 2007, 07:10:13 AM

Quote from: TheEngineer on March 06, 2007, 01:03:59 PM

The Big Bang.

Question:
If you refer to the Asteroids and Comets thread you will see a picture of what, in very layman's terms, the Big Bang would look like. My question is, how could anything be travelling faster or at a higher acceleration than anything else for anything to get up ahead of earth?

collisions, varying amounts of pressure to create the force, gravitational pull from slower, larger objects etc

well us RE would say gravity. FE would say "because it is like that *follow some made up reason*"

If you would read the FAq you would know that the same amount of force causes rotational force thereby causing stars.
Read Tom Bishop's posts.

Quote from: self on March 08, 2007, 10:00:29 AM

Quote from: _MarquisDeSade on March 07, 2007, 07:10:13 AM

Quote from: TheEngineer on March 06, 2007, 01:03:59 PM

The Big Bang.

Question:
If you refer to the Asteroids and Comets thread you will see a picture of what, in very layman's terms, the Big Bang would look like. My question is, how could anything be travelling faster or at a higher acceleration than anything else for anything to get up ahead of earth?

collisions, varying amounts of pressure to create the force, gravitational pull from slower, larger objects etc

well us RE would say gravity. FE would say "because it is like that *follow some made up reason*"

If you would read the FAq you would know that the same amount of force causes rotational force thereby causing stars.
Read Tom Bishop's posts.

Tom Bishop is a hack and a nobody

His views are no more valid than mine. especially when i've seen him answer incorrectly to the FAQ in many occasions

I will consider the FE theory remotly valid when someone can give me an answer as to why you guys think the Earth is flat.

FE is far too flawed

the only answer i see it "refer to FAQ"

well guess what

the FAQ contradicts

Tom Bishop states the government isn't in the conspiracy

but the FAQ stats otherwise

yet we're told to listen to both

bah, get ur fact right guys

Tom Bishop states the government isn't in the conspiracy

but the FAQ stats otherwise

yet we're told to listen to both

The Conspiracy is the real government of the world. The rest of them are nothing more than litigators and paper pushers. They may have their little fights over oil and whatnot. But the Conspiracy doesn't care about that.

Quote

Tom Bishop states the government isn't in the conspiracy

but the FAQ stats otherwise

yet we're told to listen to both

The Conspiracy is the real government. The rest of it is just litigators and paper pushers.

do you realise you have contradicted yourself???

do you realise you have contradicted yourself???

It all depends on what you define as a government. Is the UN a government? Was the Leauge of Nations a Government?

Could a powerful multi-national entity which controls NASA and the National Reserve behind the scenes be considered the actual government? I would say it is. After all, the real power lies within the entity that controls the money.

Quote

do you realise you have contradicted yourself???

It all depends on what you define as a government. Is the UN a government? Was the Leauge of Nations a Government?

Would a powerful entity which controls NASA and the National Reserve be considered the real government behind the scenes? I would say it is. After all, the real power lies in the entity which controls the money.

but then your forgetting links with other conspiracies such as the illuminati

United Nations is technically a government. world powers meet to discuss issues and how to resolve them

pretty much what a government does. highly established officials meeting to discuss the good of a society

whether it's actually good or not is conjecture. but yes, theoretically, it's a government in its own right

the real government ! LOL you guys are hilarious, i'm so entertained by some pea brained ADULTS believing this crap .. i mean you are adults right ? or are you just as young as i am rofl .. *sigh* keep the laughs coming guys

the real government ! LOL you guys are hilarious, i'm so entertained by some pea brained ADULTS believing this crap .. i mean you are adults right ? or are you just as young as i am rofl .. *sigh* keep the laughs coming guys

im 20 and im here the same reason you are

i can't believe how crazy it is that people believe this

"pretty much what a government does. highly established officials meeting to discuss the good of a society"

Right buddy, the government is there for your own good.

Keep repeating that in your head when the SWAT drug raid team crashes through your front door and shoots you in the head because they got "the wrong address," sucker.

Even the ancient egyptians were in on it apparently. That's why they tried to get people to believe the Earth was round. They wanted all that cash!!

No, the ancient egyptians were simply misled by their own evidence into falsely believing the Earth to be round.