Moon Light

When they went to moon they put light sensor on moon, on Earth light is sent to it and can measure the moons distance away. Explain.

When they went to moon they put light sensor on moon, on Earth light is sent to it and can measure the moons distance away. Explain.

Conspiracy, as is George of the Jungle.

When they went to moon they put light sensor on moon, on Earth light is sent to it and can measure the moons distance away. Explain.

Are we suppose to take your word for it? A word, I might add, that is virtually worthless on these forums?

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 10:44:34 AM

When they went to moon they put light sensor on moon, on Earth light is sent to it and can measure the moons distance away. Explain.

Are we suppose to take your word for it? A word, I might add, that is virtually worthless on these forums?

Ye man, its worthless even though I have provided many threads that no FE has been able to answer.

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 11:39:39 AM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 10:44:34 AM

When they went to moon they put light sensor on moon, on Earth light is sent to it and can measure the moons distance away. Explain.

Are we suppose to take your word for it? A word, I might add, that is virtually worthless on these forums?

Ye man, its worthless even though I have provided many threads that no FE has been able to answer.

You have provided many threads that are WORTHLESS.

Take this one for example, in the FE model NASA never went to the moon because going to the moon is impossible. And since that kind of information is seemingly impossible to get a hold of (the laser that measures the distance between Earth and the moon) your statement of it's existence is hereby officially considered BULL SHIT.

The fact that I would have to point this out to you is proof by itself of your repeated idiocy.

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:38:12 PM

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 11:39:39 AM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 10:44:34 AM

When they went to moon they put light sensor on moon, on Earth light is sent to it and can measure the moons distance away. Explain.

Are we suppose to take your word for it? A word, I might add, that is virtually worthless on these forums?

Ye man, its worthless even though I have provided many threads that no FE has been able to answer.

You have provided many threads that are WORTHLESS.

Take this one for example, in the FE model NASA never went to the moon because going to the moon is impossible. And since that kind of information is seemingly impossible to get a hold of (the laser that measures the distance between Earth and the moon) your statement of it's existence is hereby officially considered BULL SHIT.

The fact that I would have to point this out to you is proof by itself of your repeated idiocy.

So the people who use it are in on the conspiracy? What about the people who made it? What about the people who went onto the moon? What about the people that designed the equipment that was used for the moon? What about the people who have died in space missions? What about the family members of the people who went to the moon? What about the ice guards, people who have seen the ice wall? What about the people who have travelled to the south pole, the people who have died to uncover the truth only to refute their evidence as bullshit?

What about all the stuff FE cant explain? Such as the moons shadow, atmosphere escape, travelling times, GPS, etc.

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 12:41:05 PM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:38:12 PM

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 11:39:39 AM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 10:44:34 AM

When they went to moon they put light sensor on moon, on Earth light is sent to it and can measure the moons distance away. Explain.

Are we suppose to take your word for it? A word, I might add, that is virtually worthless on these forums?

Ye man, its worthless even though I have provided many threads that no FE has been able to answer.

You have provided many threads that are WORTHLESS.

Take this one for example, in the FE model NASA never went to the moon because going to the moon is impossible. And since that kind of information is seemingly impossible to get a hold of (the laser that measures the distance between Earth and the moon) your statement of it's existence is hereby officially considered BULL SHIT.

The fact that I would have to point this out to you is proof by itself of your repeated idiocy.

So the people who use it are in on the conspiracy? What about the people who made it? What about the people who went onto the moon? What about the people that designed the equipment that was used for the moon? What about the people who have died in space missions? What about the family members of the people who went to the moon? What about the ice guards, people who have seen the ice wall? What about the people who have travelled to the south pole, the people who have died to uncover the truth only to refute their evidence as bullshit?

Can't even post properly let alone argue a point. This is why no FEer responds to you moobs, you are a worthless conversationalist.

Not my fault the forum quote thing doesnt take me to the bottom  Its not how I type, its what I type.

The FEers, the true ones, have tons of evidence and years of science and understanding to stand their ground, if any REer came on with viable evidence of their claim then maybe it would cause a good fight.  Its just that most of the posters dont really know what they are talking about and it quickly turns into the usual round of bullshit

The FEers, the true ones, have tons of evidence and years of science and understanding to stand their ground, if any REer came on with viable evidence of their claim then maybe it would cause a good fight.  Its just that most of the posters dont really know what they are talking about and it quickly turns into the usual round of bullshit

What about all the stuff FE cant explain? Such as the moons shadow, atmosphere escape, travelling times, GPS, etc.

Explain.

Shadow object? LOL, got proof?

Quote from: FEers ftl on March 09, 2007, 12:48:41 PM

The FEers, the true ones, have tons of evidence and years of science and understanding to stand their ground, if any REer came on with viable evidence of their claim then maybe it would cause a good fight.  Its just that most of the posters dont really know what they are talking about and it quickly turns into the usual round of bullshit

What about all the stuff FE cant explain? Such as the moons shadow, atmosphere escape, travelling times, GPS, etc.

Explain.

Shadow object? LOL, got proof?

Eclipse? LOL, got proof?

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=moon%20eclipse&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Im pretty sure all those werent taken by NASA.

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=moon%20eclipse&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Im pretty sure all those werent taken by NASA.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the Earth's shadow.

You have failed.

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:53:42 PM

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=moon%20eclipse&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Im pretty sure all those werent taken by NASA.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the Earth's shadow.

You have failed.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the shadow object,

You have failed.

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 12:56:40 PM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:53:42 PM

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=moon%20eclipse&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Im pretty sure all those werent taken by NASA.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the Earth's shadow.

You have failed.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the shadow object,

You have failed.

1) I never presented pictures.

2) I never claimed that there was a shadow object

You, again, fail.

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:57:35 PM

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 12:56:40 PM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:53:42 PM

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=moon%20eclipse&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Im pretty sure all those werent taken by NASA.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the Earth's shadow.

You have failed.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the shadow object,

You have failed.

1) I never presented pictures.

2) I never claimed that there was a shadow object

You, again, fail.

So what causes the shadow on the moon? Explain.

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 12:58:42 PM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:57:35 PM

Quote from: Wolfwood on March 09, 2007, 12:56:40 PM

Quote from: MooBs on March 09, 2007, 12:53:42 PM

http://images.google.co.uk/images?q=moon%20eclipse&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-GB:official&client=firefox-a&um=1&sa=N&tab=wi

Im pretty sure all those werent taken by NASA.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the Earth's shadow.

You have failed.

You have presented pictures of a phenomenon however you have failed to prove that that phenomenon is the cause of the shadow object,

You have failed.

1) I never presented pictures.

2) I never claimed that there was a shadow object

You, again, fail.

So what causes the shadow on the moon? Explain.

Why? You are the one that is making statements of some light thing on the moon. You failed to present evidence of any such occurence or object. In fact this thread is the first time I have heard of any such object on the moon.

You are here trying to convince people of the shape of the world.

The burden of proof of ALL of the above is yours, not mine.

Once again, you fail.

This thread is failing.

The threads that dont fail you ignore, which is dull. So I create threads that do fail to at least get a response.

The threads that dont fail you ignore, which is dull. So I create threads that do fail to at least get a response.

Your attempts at self salvation are laughable and pathetic.

Do the world a favor and win a Darwin award.

You think I care that you think the Earth is flat? 

You think I care that you think the Earth is flat? 

You can't even prove that I think the Earth is Flat.

However I have proven repeatedly that you are worthless conversationalist.

Exactly, so why are u debating with me moron. 

Any explanation for the reflector they put on the moon FE morons?

Exactly, so why are u debating with me moron. 

To show you why no one else does.

I went to Mars and put an invisible elephant there. Can you find it?

People can claim all sorts of things, but unless you show us pictures of this so-called "light detector," we have zero reason to believe you.

That's preposterous- you took a picture of a piece of machinery on a beach. Give me a break.

Show me a picture of the light detector
*Shown picture*
Err dont show me picture of light detector.

I asked him to show me a picture of the "light detector." He showed me a picture he took at the beach. Don't be ridiculous, I want the real thing now, taken from our telescopes, not a picture you took at the beach.