Asteroids and Comets

Ahem

You're assuming that there is only one layer to the Big Bang. If we look up into the night sky we can quickly realize that there are many layers above us. Lightyears of layers above us. Otherwise, our sky would be quite starless.

By analogy, we can assume that the Big Bang was a continuous spout of matter and force, perhaps continuing to this very day. These multiple levels of the Big Bang would have run into each other as a direct result of the acceleration of mass, sending matter in all directions, creating potential asteroids and comets for matter further down to accelerate into.

Quote

Ahem

You're assuming that there is only one layer to the Big Bang. If we look up into the night sky we can quickly realize that there are many layers above us. Lightyears of layers above us. Otherwise, our sky would be quite starless.

By analogy, we can assume that the Big Bang was a continuous spout of matter and force, perhaps continuing to this very day. These multiple levels of the Big Bang would have run into each other as a direct result of the acceleration of mass, sending matter in all directions, creating potential asteroids and comets for matter further down to accelerate into.

Actually, I am telling you to look into the sky and see the many layers. According to FE, I do not believe there would be more than one layer. That is how I am trying to disprove your arguement.
In earlier arguements, and according to FE hypothesis, the stars aren't lightyears away.
So your answer is, since there is seemingly many layers of astronomical bodies, that means that there must be many layers and the Big Bang is still spouting matter? Wow

Actually, I am telling you to look into the sky and see the many layers. According to FE, I do not believe there would be more than one layer. That is how I am trying to disprove your arguement.

Your argument is flawed. Flat Earth literature says nothing about there being only one layer of matter to the Big Bang.

In earlier arguements, and according to FE hypothesis, the stars aren't lightyears away.

I didn't say the closest stars were were light years away, I said that there was light years of layers above us.

So your answer is, since there is seemingly many layers of astronomical bodies, that means that there must be many layers and the Big Bang is still spouting matter? Wow

I don't see why a continuous Big Bang can't explain the expanding, accelerating universe. Certainly a much better explanation than Dark Energy. After all, the Big Bang is the entity which created the very fabric of space-time itself.

Quote

Actually, I am telling you to look into the sky and see the many layers. According to FE, I do not believe there would be more than one layer. That is how I am trying to disprove your arguement.

Your argument is flawed. Flat Earth literature says nothing about there being only one layer of matter to the Big Bang.

Quote

In earlier arguements, and according to FE hypothesis, the stars aren't lightyears away.

I didn't say the closest stars were were light years away, I said that there was light years of layers above us.

Quote

So your answer is, since there is seemingly many layers of astronomical bodies, that means that there must be many layers and the Big Bang is still spouting matter? Wow

I don't see why a continuous Big Bang can't explain the expanding, accelerating universe. Certainly a much better explanation than Dark Energy. After all, the Big Bang is the entity which created the very fabric of space-time itself.

Explain the oribits of comets.

Explain the oribits of comets.

Byproduct of acceleration. Vis-a-vis the Equivalence Principle.

Quote

Explain the oribits of comets.

Byproduct of acceleration. Vis-a-vis the Equivalence Principle.

What you mean is the acceleration of earth causes a gravitational force in space that is exactly equal to the gravitational force the round earth would have so the comets orbit FE with the same trajectories as if the earth was round and had the same dimensions it supposedly has?
Bam.

No Tom. Not a by-product of equivalnce principle. You fail again. What a surprise.

What the hell does byproduct of acceleration even mean?

No Tom. Not a by-product of equivalnce principle. You fail again. What a surprise.

If you knew anything about physics or the Equivalence Principle, you would know that acceleration bends space-time in such a way that causes gravitation.

Until you find yourself a modicum of education, stop posting.

Okay Genius, what do you need for the acceleration to bend space time? Mass you complete fool. I take great offence at you of all people questioning my intelligence. Especially as you are a RE troll. A crap on at that.

Some more questions for your mighty intellect to work out.

The comet orbits what exactly?

What causes the magical curve in space time to cause the acceleration of the comet?

Okay Genius, what do you need for the acceleration to bend space time? Mass you complete fool. I take great offence at you of all people questioning my intelligence. Especially as you are a RE troll. A crap on at that.

The acceleration of mass causes gravitation. That much is obvious to a two year old.

Unless you have something meaningful to add to the conversation, you can take your fundamentalist, poorly written, Round Earth rhetoric out of here. No one here gives two hoots about your petty little round earth beliefs. If you actually think we care enough about you to hold your hand through basic physical concepts then you are sorely mistaken.

Here's an idea. Maybe you can do a little research for your own damn self and discover the reason acceleration bends space-time. I'm not your teacher.  I'm not your father. Don't go looking for parental guidance on the internet.

Quote from: kasroa on March 09, 2007, 02:29:36 PM

Okay Genius, what do you need for the acceleration to bend space time? Mass you complete fool. I take great offence at you of all people questioning my intelligence. Especially as you are a RE troll. A crap on at that.

The acceleration of mass causes gravitation. That much is obvious to a two year old.

Unless you have something meaningful to add to the conversation, you can take your fundamentalist, poorly written, Round Earth rhetoric out of here. No one here gives two hoots about your petty little round earth beliefs. If you actually think we care enough about you to hold your hand through basic physical concepts you are sorely mistaken. 

You don't believe the Earth is Flat so what are you banging on about now?

Acceleration of mass causes gravitation? Wow whwy didn't I think of that. So the Comet orbits...nothing. It accelerates towards a central point in it's orbit but there is nothing at that point causing to accelerate. However do not worry because the very fact that it's accelerating means that it can accelerate and....no this is just getting too ridiculous. Did you get a 2 year old to come up with this horse manure?

If you cannot answer questions, Tom just say so. People will have much more respect for you if you just admit when you don't know the answer. Better than spouting literally anti-science and making yourself out to be a complete tool.

Quote from: kasroa on March 09, 2007, 02:29:36 PM

Okay Genius, what do you need for the acceleration to bend space time? Mass you complete fool. I take great offence at you of all people questioning my intelligence. Especially as you are a RE troll. A crap on at that.

The acceleration of mass causes gravitation. That much is obvious to a two year old.

Unless you have something meaningful to add to the conversation, you can take your fundamentalist, poorly written, Round Earth rhetoric out of here. No one here gives two hoots about your petty little round earth beliefs. If you actually think we care enough about you to hold your hand through basic physical concepts then you are sorely mistaken.

Here's an idea. Maybe you can do a little research for your own damn self and discover the reason acceleration bends space-time. I'm not your teacher.  I'm not your father. Don't go looking for parental guidance on the internet.

but wat causes the acceleration

yes it is possible that multiple big bands could of occurred. very possible because we do not know how the universe was created

but this cannot explain how something will constantly accelerate

u would need explosion after explosion after explosion to even cause this push. you'd need a constant source to accelerate