Nuclear Power Exaggerated

No nuclear weapons, what the hell leveled nagusaki?? What are nuclear power stations then? we've seen what happens when they go critical.

So;.....

 some of this shit is quite entertaining: I'm sure that all of those folks involved at the Test Site facility here and the "Down-winders' effected by the fall-out from above -ground detonations are all part of this conspiracy.

that's some serious dedication to a cause: These people had to;
a) somehow knowingly induce and display illnesses completely consistant with exposure to radioactive materials,
b) convince themselves that they had no prior or subsequent knowledge of how this was accomplished, and
c) consistantly die at accelerated rates, whilst endlessly wrangling in court vs. a govt which , of course, they are all implicitly allied with in this neat little conspiracy.

Again; this shit is hilarious. In a wonderfully psychotic way.

no offence intended to you certifiable loonies out there.

With few exceptions most on this site are pathetic pawns in the Ignosceni Revolution.

dude, some of the people in here are totally out of touch with the world. Myself included.

edit

With few exceptions most on this site are pathetic pawns in the Ignosceni Revolution.

That statement gave me pause. Rare. Well done.

Don't encourage him. He talks like that CONSTANTLY. It can sound witty in a sentence or two, but eventually.....

Don't encourage him. He talks like that CONSTANTLY. It can sound witty in a sentence or two, but eventually.....

.....you oviously lose your way amid unfamiliar terms and less-familiar logic.

So; your narrow attention span spins you off into barely litterate spasms of puerile comment.

You are clearly out of your depth, here, Raist.

LOL, what utter shite you talk.

Quote

Don't encourage him. He talks like that CONSTANTLY. It can sound witty in a sentence or two, but eventually.....

.....you oviously lose your way amid unfamiliar terms and less-familiar logic.

So; your narrow attention span spins you off into barely litterate spasms of puerile comment.

You are clearly out of your depth, here, Raist.

No, you are simply unfunny. I completely understand your posts. I maintain my stance that your humor is childish and stupid. If you were funny I would let it slide instead you are a pretentious little prick clearly trying to make up for something.

.....you oviously lose your way amid unfamiliar terms and less-familiar logic.

So; your narrow attention span spins you off into barely litterate spasms of puerile comment.

You are clearly out of your depth, here, Raist.

This post is the definition of irony.

Okay, so I'm new here.

I'm not a believer in flat earth crap or what ever (in fact I think it is ridiculous), but seriously...to say nuclear weapons don't exist?

So if we are able to create a stable nuclear fission reaction, then we should be able to create an unstable one...which is exactly what a nuclear bomb is.

But if Nuclear weapons don't exist, then Nuclear power sources must not exist either. I'm sure someone mentioned that as a part of their theory as well but I didn't bother to look through the 18 pages of mindless dribble.

Nuclear fall out says that a nuclear bomb was dropped on Japan. Witness's say the bomb was dropped. The deaths of thousands of people in an instant say it happened. A raging fire could not kill thousands of people in an instant.

The intensity of the light emitted from a nuclear explosion is great enough to blind and severely burn someone even from miles away...there were plenty of people who can vouch for that.

So all of the videos of nuclear weapons and the big casing they were made out of was all fake. Why? What is the point? What is the incentive?

This site seems to be full of people who just want to make up ridiculous conspiracy theories. And I thought "Truthers" were bad...

Ah What Da,

of course this is Ridiculous.
As noted, there is overwhelming physical evidence for the existance of nuclear weapons

Only a complete idiot would serious consider, much less believe otherwise.

As propaganda;
It's much more plausible that the actual numbers of these weapons and/or their yields might be inflated.

In theory; those sub-terranean based delivery system emplacements located in several US mid-west States could consist of a certain percentage of "Prop" Missiles and/ or payloads.
Unless someone has Top-Secret clearence, knows the Science and personally lay eyes and hands to each and every of these for inspection; how do the rest of us know that some of 'em aint foam,fg and paint???

Theres a Do-able conspiracy for you, the BS missile program......
 
 

Ah What Da,

of course this is Ridiculous.
As noted, there is overwhelming physical evidence for the existance of nuclear weapons

Only a complete idiot would serious consider, much less believe otherwise.

As propaganda;
It's much more plausible that the actual numbers of these weapons and/or their yields might be inflated.

In theory; those sub-terranean based delivery system emplacements located in several US mid-west States could consist of a certain percentage of "Prop" Missiles and/ or payloads.
Unless someone has Top-Secret clearence, knows the Science and personally lay eyes and hands to each and every of these for inspection; how do the rest of us know that some of 'em aint foam,fg and paint???

Theres a Do-able conspiracy for you, the BS missile program......
 
 

See that makes sense. This is a conspiracy theory that actually has some logic to it. That's something I would be willing to believe in if I cared enough to....but I don't.

Quote

Don't encourage him. He talks like that CONSTANTLY. It can sound witty in a sentence or two, but eventually.....

.....you oviously lose your way amid unfamiliar terms and less-familiar logic.

So; your narrow attention span spins you off into barely litterate spasms of puerile comment.

You are clearly out of your depth, here, Raist.

Quote from: Mythix Profit on November 26, 2007, 02:00:43 PM

With few exceptions most on this site are pathetic pawns in the Ignosceni Revolution.

That statement gave me pause. Rare. Well done.

Giving me pause is not something to be lauded. I was questioning how deep that...creature's gene pool is. The floater gerbil tells all.

Ah What Da,

of course this is Ridiculous.
As noted, there is overwhelming physical evidence for the existance of nuclear weapons

Only a complete idiot would serious consider, much less believe otherwise.

As propaganda;
It's much more plausible that the actual numbers of these weapons and/or their yields might be inflated.

In theory; those sub-terranean based delivery system emplacements located in several US mid-west States could consist of a certain percentage of "Prop" Missiles and/ or payloads.
Unless someone has Top-Secret clearence, knows the Science and personally lay eyes and hands to each and every of these for inspection; how do the rest of us know that some of 'em aint foam,fg and paint???

Theres a Do-able conspiracy for you, the BS missile program......
 
 

And as for that last tidbit of mindlessness, my hometown has 4 silos, and a defense screen known as PaysPaas, and it is a major employer there. I have been on a public (yep) tour of the facility, and yes, they are live nukes. And also, the atom is 20 years ago. We now have the Neutron.

Catch up, fuckstick.

Dude, that avatar is the sickest thing I have ever seen! Holy shit! lol ... damn, I think I may have nightmares..

I was more disturbed by the Dexter avatar.

What do you find so disturbing about Dexter?

My question. What is dexter?

My question. What is dexter?

He'll charm fellow officers with a doughnut, wile away a Sunday with his girlfriend Rita, or chop up a victim and package their body parts in plastic bags. Hiding beneath the mundane exterior and contrived façade of Dexter, a charming blood spatter expert for the Miami Police Department, is an obsession with meting his own twisted brand of justice: stalking and murdering the guilty.

http://www.sho.com/site/dexter/home.do

Dude, that avatar is the sickest thing I have ever seen! Holy shit! lol ... damn, I think I may have nightmares..

'tis my face, in caricature.

Did you see the season finale, Mids?

2 weeks ago. It's me, after all.

Although I like Dexter, I think Sylar is a better serial killer.

2 weeks ago. It's me, after all.

I didn't realize the last two episodes had been leaked until the 8th.

It sucks that the season is already over, and nobody has any idea when they will start shooting the third one. Damn strike.

Although I like Dexter, I think Sylar is a better serial killer.

Sylar is not even comparable to Dexter.

Quote from: Midnight on December 12, 2007, 05:39:46 PM

2 weeks ago. It's me, after all.

I didn't realize the last two episodes had been leaked until the 8th.

It sucks that the season is already over, and nobody has any idea when they will start shooting the third one. Damn strike.

Quote from: Lord Z on December 12, 2007, 09:20:18 PM

Although I like Dexter, I think Sylar is a better serial killer.

Sylar is not even comparable to Dexter.

Sylar would pwn Dexter in the brain.

Sylar would pwn Dexter in the brain.

1) Sylar has superpowers, and superpowers are cheating. Sylar can't exist in real life, so Dexter wins by default, being the only believable character of the two.

2) Sylar isn't even original. He is just a clone of half of the generic supervillains who already exist. The writers of Heroes basically used a bad guy template when creating him.

3) Dexter is the protagonist of his show. Any writer can make an audience hate a killer, but it takes a damn good writer to make their audience sympathize with a killer.

There's plenty more reasons why Dexter is better, but I've got to go for now.

Quote from: Lord Z on December 12, 2007, 10:58:36 PM

Sylar would pwn Dexter in the brain.

1) Sylar has superpowers, and superpowers are cheating. Sylar can't exist in real life, so Dexter wins by default, being the only believable character of the two.

Through all of season 2, Sylar had no superpowers. He killed loads of people anyway.

2) Sylar isn't even original. He is just a clone of half of the generic supervillains who already exist. The writers of Heroes basically used a bad guy template when creating him.

So which supervillain decapitates people to steal their powers?

3) Dexter is the protagonist of his show. Any writer can make an audience hate a killer, but it takes a damn good writer to make their audience sympathize with a killer.

There's plenty more reasons why Dexter is better, but I've got to go for now.

Sylar did a pretty good job of convincing people he was a victim.

Thanks to Sandokhan for this excellent link to which I refer anyone who invokes Ukraine's Chernobyl propaganda to support their belief in radiation.

http://www.21stcenturysciencetech.com/articles/chernobyl.html

+Dionysios

Um, it's ridiculous and false for anyone to claim that you're not retarded. Those photos could have been easily been fake. I mean, all pictures of the Round Earth are fake, why couldn't these be?

No they're not : (