Nuclear Power Exaggerated

  • 4288 Replies
  • 741213 Views
*

Lorddave

  • 18142
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #510 on: December 25, 2011, 07:54:41 AM »
Quote from: 17 November
I believe that subterranean dragons are the source of terrestrial volcanoes, and submarine dragons (i.e. sea serpents) are the source of underwater volcanoes.

Yeah, hes a troll.

Wrong, and I meant what I said when I posted that. 

'Field Guide to Lake Monsters, Sea Serpents, and Other Denizens of the Deep'
By Loren Coleman
http://www.amazon.com/Field-Monsters-Serpents-Mystery-Denizensof/dp/1585422525

'In the Wake of the Sea Serpents'
By Bernard Heuvelmans
http://www.amazon.com/Wake-Sea-Serpents-Bernard-Heuvelmans/dp/0809058146/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1324776835&sr=1-1

Dragons are real.  They have been very well documented in the Bible and other ancient sources as well as modern times.
The fact that you have the faith of a loser changes nothing aside from the entrenchment of your own delusion.
Why are they so well documented yet have never been capture or even photographed?
And don't say it's because science won't let them because we all know that science does add cryptids in when they find them.


Also:
If I start WW3 and Greece is nuked while you're in it, will you believe nuclear weapons exist?

I don't think he'd believe much of anything at that point.
He would if there is an afterlife.
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

?

Silverdane

  • 346
  • Deutschland Double Heil!! @_@//
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #511 on: December 25, 2011, 10:12:46 AM »
I did not think such a thread exists.

I have long suspected and was convinced there was no such thing as "atomic weapons". They are fiction, and utter fluffery. Just like USSR's "Ivan" bomb that would remain on a ship and would destroy the entire world if USSR was destroyed by these so called "atomic weapons", which don't even exist.

If atomic weapons were ever real, or could be real, Hitler would have kept all those idiot scientists who suggested this theory, instead of throwing them out of the Third Reich.

Then used those "bombs" to destroy London, remove Britain out of the war, destroy USSR's massive industrial factories, that made all those tanks in WW2, and conquered most of Eurasia, in less than a year.

Since that did not happen, it's obvious there is no such thing as bombs stronger than common mines. Or at best, the siege cannons that germans moved by train rails. Those are obviously true, and they can be fired at any time, against any target within it's range. With clear visible effects. Same as the V1 and V2 rockets, which I assume are harder to fake, since they apparently did some damage in England?

Clearly those silly drawings of Nagawaki or Fapan, are made up. They have absolutely no crater. No animals suffering from so called "radiation". Just like the wild nature and animals in Chernobyl that are utterly unaffected by any of this. So nuclear plants are not harmful, they're not even capable of killing someone or nature around them, in a worst case disaster. They just heat up and melt things around, exactly like a volcano. Big deal.

But that's it. There's no radiations. Except maybe concentrated radio waves, like EMP's which I suspect are real. But they just short out every sensitive electrical pulse from a certain range. Again, not really a weapon of mass destruction.

If it were, the US would have destroyed every enemy in the world by now. Vietnam, Korea, Russia, you name it. They would be history by now. None of them were destroyed. The US fears them so much, they were forced to make up a fictional "Evil Bomb" that supposedly .... does nothing. And some countries are stupid enough to fear those lies. Idiots.

Of course those bombs are impossible. They have never existed. Nor will they ever.

Unless of course, one of you "believers" or "Atomic Thumpers" are packing, and have an atomic bombs in a suitcase. In which case let's take a short trip to New York or Washington, and I'll be there with you on ground zero, when you plant it.

Then we'll safely sail to Ellis Island, and "watch the fireworks" as we sail back to Europe. Yaaaaaay !! Since that will never happen, because these bombs do not exist, I am saddened to say New York and the White House are there to stay.

Drat !!
We shall have a magnificent orgy garden party & you're not invited

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #512 on: December 25, 2011, 11:59:20 AM »
I did not think such a thread exists.

I have long suspected and was convinced there was no such thing as "atomic weapons". They are fiction, and utter fluffery. Just like USSR's "Ivan" bomb that would remain on a ship and would destroy the entire world if USSR was destroyed by these so called "atomic weapons", which don't even exist.

If atomic weapons were ever real, or could be real, Hitler would have kept all those idiot scientists who suggested this theory, instead of throwing them out of the Third Reich.

Then used those "bombs" to destroy London, remove Britain out of the war, destroy USSR's massive industrial factories, that made all those tanks in WW2, and conquered most of Eurasia, in less than a year.

Since that did not happen, it's obvious there is no such thing as bombs stronger than common mines. Or at best, the siege cannons that germans moved by train rails. Those are obviously true, and they can be fired at any time, against any target within it's range. With clear visible effects. Same as the V1 and V2 rockets, which I assume are harder to fake, since they apparently did some damage in England?

Clearly those silly drawings of Nagawaki or Fapan, are made up. They have absolutely no crater. No animals suffering from so called "radiation". Just like the wild nature and animals in Chernobyl that are utterly unaffected by any of this. So nuclear plants are not harmful, they're not even capable of killing someone or nature around them, in a worst case disaster. They just heat up and melt things around, exactly like a volcano. Big deal.

But that's it. There's no radiations. Except maybe concentrated radio waves, like EMP's which I suspect are real. But they just short out every sensitive electrical pulse from a certain range. Again, not really a weapon of mass destruction.

If it were, the US would have destroyed every enemy in the world by now. Vietnam, Korea, Russia, you name it. They would be history by now. None of them were destroyed. The US fears them so much, they were forced to make up a fictional "Evil Bomb" that supposedly .... does nothing. And some countries are stupid enough to fear those lies. Idiots.

Of course those bombs are impossible. They have never existed. Nor will they ever.

Unless of course, one of you "believers" or "Atomic Thumpers" are packing, and have an atomic bombs in a suitcase. In which case let's take a short trip to New York or Washington, and I'll be there with you on ground zero, when you plant it.

Then we'll safely sail to Ellis Island, and "watch the fireworks" as we sail back to Europe. Yaaaaaay !! Since that will never happen, because these bombs do not exist, I am saddened to say New York and the White House are there to stay.

Drat !!

Reported for terrorism.

?

Silverdane

  • 346
  • Deutschland Double Heil!! @_@//
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #513 on: December 25, 2011, 12:59:03 PM »
Reported for terrorism.

You reported America for terrorism?

Great, I can't wait to see them locked up. HAHAHAHAHA
We shall have a magnificent orgy garden party & you're not invited

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #514 on: December 25, 2011, 04:32:31 PM »
Reported for terrorism.

You reported America for terrorism?

Great, I can't wait to see them locked up. HAHAHAHAHA

Your IP has been sent to homeland security as well as your post. I have also given them your email and all other pertinent information.

Have a great day.

*

Lorddave

  • 18142
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #515 on: December 26, 2011, 02:43:10 AM »
Of course those bombs are impossible. They have never existed. Nor will they ever.

Thank you for this post. 

I am still waiting for the bombs they claimed Saddam Hussein had - let alone the United States itself.
Why are you waiting for bombs from Iraq when it was already learned that the intelligence was wrong?

As for the US:
Well, would you like us to use them to prove they exist? Or is there a country, like Iran, whom you trust to provide that information?
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #516 on: December 26, 2011, 09:14:17 AM »
Nuclear fission is just a conspiracy.

?

Silverdane

  • 346
  • Deutschland Double Heil!! @_@//
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #517 on: December 28, 2011, 05:47:20 PM »
Why are you waiting for bombs from Iraq when it was already learned that the intelligence was wrong?

As for the US:
Well, would you like us to use them to prove they exist? Or is there a country, like Iran, whom you trust to provide that information?

Convince Homeland Suckurity to send all their A-Bomb at my location. Fortunately Raist already gave them my IP and all perky infomercials.

I'd love to see how a bunch of fireworks land in my neighbourhood on Christmas and New Year's Eve. Although I fear for the lone wolf who is hiding in the middle of my city.

No one else has heard that wolf, except me. At the late late hours of night, in the darkest of darkest, it howls. Sorrow filled the wolf howled, yet no wolf answered.

I suspect it has found it's way here, from the Serbian realm, after crossing the frozen Danube, or swimming here. How it manages to hide in such a massive busy city, is fascinating. I hope it doesn't get scared away because of the fireworks now.

Poor wolf. Fortunately most of the people in my city are idiots. They would just confuse it with a dog, if they saw it, and no one could realise it's a wolf. Even if they heard it howl, or if it ate their face. Tragic.

We shall have a magnificent orgy garden party & you're not invited

?

Silverdane

  • 346
  • Deutschland Double Heil!! @_@//
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #518 on: December 28, 2011, 05:54:30 PM »
Nuclear fission is just a conspiracy.

Excuse me, are you speaking to a Chernobyl baby right now? I don't see myself growing tentacles, extra eyes, cancer, or any unusual signs of exposure to radioactivity.

The russians used to mine some radioactiv metal, like uranium or plutonium from a mountain village few hundred miles from my city, and the peasants there have lived for decades with the unclosed mines near and around their village. Despite the radiations they are still normal people.

When those metals are overused, they just heat up. Concrete tends to melt around them. Just like gunpowder only very slow in it's reaction. So it needs large rivers like the Danube to cool down it's metal cores.

Again, none of this sounds deadly or dangerous or what ever you have grown up worshiping, fearing and loving at the same time.

Cold fission also exists, and it's a good source of Zero Point "energy". Perfectly harmless, of course.

You're like one of those people in old villages that look like Dracula movies who live in eternal darkness and mists, fearing Frankenstein, crucifying witches every forthnight, and keeping chicken feet amulets on your hut, to ward off the evil spirits.

Frankenstein isn't real either. Neither are cursed mummies. Swamp monsters on the other hand ... I hope are real. Just like forest people.
We shall have a magnificent orgy garden party & you're not invited

*

Lorddave

  • 18142
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #519 on: December 28, 2011, 11:27:58 PM »
Can you provide the name of this peasant village? Or perhaps the city name you speak of? An exact location of the mine would also be helpful.

Also, can you describe in detail cold fusion? I would like to run my house on zero point energy.

And finally: where do you think the heat comes from with regards to Uranium and plutonium?
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #520 on: December 29, 2011, 01:58:41 PM »
Dave, he said cold fission. Which quite frankly is hilarious.

?

Silverdane

  • 346
  • Deutschland Double Heil!! @_@//
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #521 on: December 29, 2011, 04:46:22 PM »
Can you provide the name of this peasant village? Or perhaps the city name you speak of? An exact location of the mine would also be helpful.

Also, can you describe in detail cold fusion? I would like to run my house on zero point energy.

And finally: where do you think the heat comes from with regards to Uranium and plutonium?

Outside sources, they just store it better.

I would but being apart of the FET conspiracy I am forbidden from helping the world achieve "Great Success".

Sure, if you travel to my country, I will personally escort you to the village, where the russians mined some radioactive metal, and left the mines unsealed. You will see no one there died, or grew wings.

They're fine. The name cannot be translated into English. It's native European name. It's general translation is something like "The Red One", only female.

Basically the suffix of the name has a female termination, which red or one, simply do not. So telling you the name would just look like a bunch of stupid letters.

But I can say it's in the Carpathian mountains, possibly in Transilvania, if I recall well. Between gold mines, which appear in the same mountain and even the romans mined it, and left their galleries there.
We shall have a magnificent orgy garden party & you're not invited

?

Hazbollah

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2444
  • Earth Shape Apathetic.
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #522 on: January 03, 2012, 10:49:15 AM »
That would be because Uranium in and of itself is harmless. It is only the isotope that is harmful. So unless there was an exposed centrifuge next door, your account is not surprising.
Always check your tackle- Caerphilly school of Health. If I see an innuendo in my post, I'll be sure to whip it out.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #523 on: January 03, 2012, 10:57:08 AM »
That would be because Uranium in and of itself is harmless. It is only the isotope that is harmful. So unless there was an exposed centrifuge next door, your account is not surprising.

All uranium is radioactive. At natural concentrations it would be harmless, however at unnatural amounts (i.e. a mine) it could cause a great amount of health concerns. I don't understand why you thought that, or why you took silverdane seriously.

*

Raist

  • The Elder Ones
  • 30590
  • The cat in the Matrix
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #524 on: January 05, 2012, 02:00:12 AM »
Can you provide the name of this peasant village? Or perhaps the city name you speak of? An exact location of the mine would also be helpful.

Also, can you describe in detail cold fusion? I would like to run my house on zero point energy.

And finally: where do you think the heat comes from with regards to Uranium and plutonium?

Outside sources, they just store it better.

I would but being apart of the FET conspiracy I am forbidden from helping the world achieve "Great Success".

Sure, if you travel to my country, I will personally escort you to the village, where the russians mined some radioactive metal, and left the mines unsealed. You will see no one there died, or grew wings.


Nobody dies there? That is the most amazing thing I've ever heard. Uranium is the cure for death, but only the non radioactive isotopes according to hazbollah.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #525 on: January 05, 2012, 10:55:24 AM »
Uranium is the cure for death, but only the non radioactive isotopes

What a shame.

*

Lorddave

  • 18142
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #526 on: January 07, 2012, 09:30:45 PM »
Can you provide the name of this peasant village? Or perhaps the city name you speak of? An exact location of the mine would also be helpful.

Also, can you describe in detail cold fusion? I would like to run my house on zero point energy.

And finally: where do you think the heat comes from with regards to Uranium and plutonium?

Outside sources, they just store it better.
So it is deadly.  Gotcha.

Quote
I would but being apart of the FET conspiracy I am forbidden from helping the world achieve "Great Success".
You do not seem to understand TFES.

Quote
Sure, if you travel to my country, I will personally escort you to the village, where the russians mined some radioactive metal, and left the mines unsealed. You will see no one there died, or grew wings.

They're fine. The name cannot be translated into English. It's native European name. It's general translation is something like "The Red One", only female.

Basically the suffix of the name has a female termination, which red or one, simply do not. So telling you the name would just look like a bunch of stupid letters.

But I can say it's in the Carpathian mountains, possibly in Transilvania, if I recall well. Between gold mines, which appear in the same mountain and even the romans mined it, and left their galleries there.
You say "my country" without naming the country.  You also seem to be unsure of it's location yet say you can take me there. 
Also, why would I need the English name?  It will not be labeled as such on a map would it?  Please give me the original language name.

And why would anyone grow wings from radiation? 

Also:
How is it that no one died in that village?  Surely the elderly died of natural causes?  Or maybe the mine had an accident and someone was killed by falling rocks or poison gas?  Or is the village full of immortals?
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #527 on: January 07, 2012, 10:35:25 PM »
Dave, I'm not sure if you know, but Silverdane was banned a few days ago.

*

Lorddave

  • 18142
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #528 on: January 07, 2012, 10:48:38 PM »
Dave, I'm not sure if you know, but Silverdane was banned a few days ago.
I did not.  Why was he banned?  And is it a perma ban?
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

?

Around And About

  • 2615
  • Circular Logic Falls Flat
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #529 on: January 07, 2012, 10:57:47 PM »
Dave, I'm not sure if you know, but Silverdane was banned a few days ago.
I did not.  Why was he banned?  And is it a perma ban?

Why was he banned, haha good one. Silverdane is probably from the Balkans, somewhere.
I'm not black nor a thug, I'm more like god who will bring 7 plagues of flat earth upon your ass.

*

Lorddave

  • 18142
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #530 on: January 07, 2012, 11:06:39 PM »
Sure, if you travel to my country, I will personally escort you to the village, where the russians mined some radioactive metal, and left the mines unsealed. You will see no one there died, or grew wings.

The village of which you speak sounds like it is located in Romania.
I have definitely noticed a tendency among eastern euopeans to see through the transparency of myths fabricated by news media. 
Thank you for the posts, Mr. Silverdane.
Except when they say something you don't like.

Dave, I'm not sure if you know, but Silverdane was banned a few days ago.
I did not.  Why was he banned?  And is it a perma ban?

Why was he banned, haha good one. Silverdane is probably from the Balkans, somewhere.
I don't keep up with his posts so I really don't know.
You have been ignored for common interest of mankind.

I am a terrible person and I am a typical Blowhard Liberal for being wrong about Bom.

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11803
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #531 on: January 08, 2012, 07:37:07 AM »
I think silverdane was banned for personal attacks in upper fora, roundy said in another post somewhere.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #532 on: January 11, 2012, 08:02:03 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #533 on: January 11, 2012, 08:41:31 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

17N doesn't believe that nuclear fission is fake, he just doesn't think it can create a single large bomb. Since heating water and blowing up cities take quite a different amount of energy, attacking his argument from this angle won't work.

Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #534 on: January 11, 2012, 09:08:40 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

17N doesn't believe that nuclear fission is fake, he just doesn't think it can create a single large bomb. Since heating water and blowing up cities take quite a different amount of energy, attacking his argument from this angle won't work.

Just for the sake of argument.

If nuclear fission does exist and the technology to harvest exists, what would stop us from making a bomb?

If there is one thing I believe, is the human capability of doing harm to others.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #535 on: January 11, 2012, 09:25:18 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

17N doesn't believe that nuclear fission is fake, he just doesn't think it can create a single large bomb. Since heating water and blowing up cities take quite a different amount of energy, attacking his argument from this angle won't work.

Just for the sake of argument.

If nuclear fission does exist and the technology to harvest exists, what would stop us from making a bomb?

If there is one thing I believe, is the human capability of doing harm to others.

There simply isn't enough energy created by fission to create a bomb.

Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #536 on: January 11, 2012, 09:28:19 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

17N doesn't believe that nuclear fission is fake, he just doesn't think it can create a single large bomb. Since heating water and blowing up cities take quite a different amount of energy, attacking his argument from this angle won't work.

Just for the sake of argument.

If nuclear fission does exist and the technology to harvest exists, what would stop us from making a bomb?

If there is one thing I believe, is the human capability of doing harm to others.

There simply isn't enough energy created by fission to create a bomb.

Einstein would disagree with this sentence.
Just saying.

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #537 on: January 11, 2012, 09:29:47 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

17N doesn't believe that nuclear fission is fake, he just doesn't think it can create a single large bomb. Since heating water and blowing up cities take quite a different amount of energy, attacking his argument from this angle won't work.

Just for the sake of argument.

If nuclear fission does exist and the technology to harvest exists, what would stop us from making a bomb?

If there is one thing I believe, is the human capability of doing harm to others.

There simply isn't enough energy created by fission to create a bomb.

Einstein would disagree with this sentence.
Just saying.

His relativity never meant that mass could ever be converted straight into energy. The only energy released is the energy bonding the nucleus together. Which does not generate enough for a weapon.

Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #538 on: January 11, 2012, 09:36:44 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

17N doesn't believe that nuclear fission is fake, he just doesn't think it can create a single large bomb. Since heating water and blowing up cities take quite a different amount of energy, attacking his argument from this angle won't work.

Just for the sake of argument.

If nuclear fission does exist and the technology to harvest exists, what would stop us from making a bomb?

If there is one thing I believe, is the human capability of doing harm to others.

There simply isn't enough energy created by fission to create a bomb.

Einstein would disagree with this sentence.
Just saying.

His relativity never meant that mass could ever be converted straight into energy. The only energy released is the energy bonding the nucleus together. Which does not generate enough for a weapon.

Yes it does o.0

*

Rushy

  • 8971
Re: Nuclear Weapons Do Not Exist
« Reply #539 on: January 11, 2012, 10:12:20 PM »
If nuclear bombs do not exist, all the Nuclear Power stations in the world is fake too?

17N doesn't believe that nuclear fission is fake, he just doesn't think it can create a single large bomb. Since heating water and blowing up cities take quite a different amount of energy, attacking his argument from this angle won't work.

Just for the sake of argument.

If nuclear fission does exist and the technology to harvest exists, what would stop us from making a bomb?

If there is one thing I believe, is the human capability of doing harm to others.

There simply isn't enough energy created by fission to create a bomb.

Einstein would disagree with this sentence.
Just saying.

His relativity never meant that mass could ever be converted straight into energy. The only energy released is the energy bonding the nucleus together. Which does not generate enough for a weapon.

Yes it does o.0
Nope.