Like I said, your cardinal direction would not change.
So you said: when you're travelling east, youre travelling east. Great input.
Maintaining a rate of turn, especially one so shallow, would allow for the pilots to become 'used' to the turn, or spatially disoriented.
We can argue this all day without going anywhere so theres no point perpetuating it.
They don't. They drink coffee and read magazines. Oh, and every once and a while, they turn a knob.
We can also argue this all day, unless someone here has sat in the cockpit throughout a flight.
Oh? So you're saying that you don't have to turn at all in order to circumnavigate the Earth on the round Earth model? You mean to say that if you were to fly along the equator for some forty-thousand kilometers that you wouldn't be traveling around in a circle? Please explain to me, then, how would one reach the point where he originally began if not via a circle. I'm curious to know.
~D-Draw
I actually explained it above. The type of turning we were referring to was 2 dimensional turning (travelling straight along a line without deviating from it, with regard to the dimensions of depth and width - in front of you and to your left and right). So when you travel along any great circle (
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_circle), you do not turn left or right; the only dimension that changes is height. Due to the small section of curvature we can view at any time, this change is not noticeable.
This change is not, however, the same type of change going on when a person must constantly turn right or left (depending on if that person is travelling clockwise or counter-clockwise, respectively) in order to continue travelling exactly due east.
Along the equator on the RE model, one would not have to turn left or right at all in order to remain travelling exactly east.