The Number of People in the Conspiracy

Obviously, the gravity that stars have so much of pulls the space ship off the earth, and the space ship only uses fuel to leave its gravitational pull and come back to the Earth.

Quote from: astronomy101 on March 02, 2007, 11:45:56 AM

Obviously, the gravity that stars have so much of pulls the space ship off the earth, and the space ship only uses fuel to leave its gravitational pull and come back to the Earth.

Or maybe they just park it on the other side of the moon until it's time to come back.

Or maybe they just land the shuttle on the other side of the moon until it's time to come back.

What was the motive for the conspiracy before the space program?  This isn't such a recent theory...

Quote from: unclegravy on March 01, 2007, 08:05:02 PM

Ah, so it's an accident now, is it, Tom?

Add to the list those who have expeditions to "Antarctica".

Oh, and a few people in Discovery Channel and the like, they have features on Antarctica almost all the time.

Antarctic excursions are completely possible. In a non-euclidean FE model it would be possible to travel south and eventually end up where you started.

A simple mind would assume it's because the earth is curved. An innovative mind would realize that it is space-time itself that's curved.

What was the motive for the conspiracy before the space program?  This isn't such a recent theory...

Good point.  And the non-Euclidean geometry you need is described by me in the thread "Why ships' hulls disappear, photos from space and other mysteries"
It explains everything except the ice wall, for which I need one more theory - which I'll get to once I've explained the space pictures.

I'm late but don't forget the 1000 of people needed to hide the GPS conspericy.

I love it when someone says "Have you experienced this for yourself?" but yet, that same person claims other rediculous crap that they haven't experienced for them self either. like guards on the "ice wall" for example. I would like to meet one of these infamous ice wall guards and ask him what his salary is, because apparently it is pretty good. I want to fill out an application for it was well. It sounds like a great career opportunity!

I also want to meet the man that invented the photoshop software that was made when the first photos of the earth came out. funny how those first computers couldnt even get more than 8 colors at best, yet somehow pull off a great picture of the earth.

The US government couldn't even pull off a measely conspiracy like Watergate or 9/11 without it being blown wide open, do you really think they could pull off something as gargantuan as a Flat Earth conspiracy? HAH!

Quote from: astronomy101 on March 01, 2007, 06:14:23 AM

1. People who fake the pictures/ Probaly working for NASA - ABout 100 I would say.

A hundred people to fake a few pictures? I know people who could throw some of those pictures together in a couple of hours. Why would you need 100 people?

Please refer to the FAQ and conduct a search

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 06, 2007, 05:56:41 AM

The US government couldn't even pull off a measely conspiracy like Watergate or 9/11 without it being blown wide open, do you really think they could pull off something as gargantuan as a Flat Earth conspiracy? HAH!

You really think the U.S. governemtn committed 9-11? Hell, I am an anarchist and think otherwise.

Quote from: astronomy101 on March 06, 2007, 06:07:01 AM

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 06, 2007, 05:56:41 AM

The US government couldn't even pull off a measely conspiracy like Watergate or 9/11 without it being blown wide open, do you really think they could pull off something as gargantuan as a Flat Earth conspiracy? HAH!

You really think the U.S. governemtn committed 9-11? Hell, I am an anarchist and think otherwise.

What kind of Anarchist are you exactly? A Black Flag, "socialist," violent bomb-throwing "Anarchist," or a real Anarchist?

Probably not a real one then.

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 09, 2007, 05:12:56 PM

Probably not a real one then.

Define real anarchist then...

Quote from: _MarquisDeSade on March 12, 2007, 11:24:41 AM

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 09, 2007, 05:12:56 PM

Probably not a real one then.

Define real anarchist then...

The State is defined as a monopoly of legitimized force on a given territory.
"Anarchists" who use violence believe that their use of force is legitimate, and that the State's use of force is not legitimate.
Ergo "Anarchists" who use violence want to become the State, and cannot be Anarchists.
QED MOTHERFUCKER

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 12, 2007, 12:51:18 PM

Quote from: _MarquisDeSade on March 12, 2007, 11:24:41 AM

Quote from: Francois Tremblay on March 09, 2007, 05:12:56 PM

Probably not a real one then.

Define real anarchist then...

The State is defined as a monopoly of legitimized force on a given territory.
"Anarchists" who use violence believe that their use of force is legitimate, and that the State's use of force is not legitimate.
Ergo "Anarchists" who use violence want to become the State, and cannot be Anarchists.
QED MOTHERFUCKER

Actually, many anarchists only use"violence" in selfdefense.
True, many anarchists advocated "propaganda by deed" in the early 1900's, but the movement has since changed.
Many anarchists, now, are pacifists.
Try infoshop.org before you post your stereotypical comments on anarchists.