DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?

  • 52 Replies
  • 8906 Views
DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« on: February 28, 2007, 05:59:27 AM »
I was just wondering this. SInce, what I can make from this site, everything is accelerating at 9.8 m/ s*s, and I imagine everything started accelerating at the same time, nothing is goning faster than anything else, or so I think. SO How can asteroids and comets exist, since they are flying all over the place and their tragectories(?) are based on gravity?

Do asteroids and comets exist in Flat Earth Hypothesis? :o
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #1 on: February 28, 2007, 06:06:23 AM »
I was just wondering this. SInce, what I can make from this site, everything is accelerating at 9.8 m/ s*s, and I imagine everything started accelerating at the same time, nothing is goning faster than anything else, or so I think. SO How can asteroids and comets exist, since they are flying all over the place and their tragectories(?) are based on gravity?

Do asteroids and comets exist in Flat Earth Hypothesis? :o

If they don't, i'm sure they'll be claimed as NASA's doing.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #2 on: February 28, 2007, 06:22:04 AM »
Have you ever seen an asteroid or coment IRL?

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #3 on: February 28, 2007, 06:23:01 AM »
Have you ever seen an asteroid or coment IRL?

Millions have.  That's why there's people out in the dark when they come around.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #4 on: February 28, 2007, 06:24:04 AM »
Have you ever seen an asteroid or coment IRL?

Millions have.  That's why there's people out in the dark when they come around.

I mean one's that aren't easily faked. OH, a little flamming dot in the sky is passing by!

So, in an FE'ers state of mind, I suppose the question should be restated like this: "Have you ever been hit by a comet or asteroid?"

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #5 on: February 28, 2007, 06:29:55 AM »
Have you ever seen an asteroid or coment IRL?

Millions have.  That's why there's people out in the dark when they come around.

I mean one's that aren't easily faked. OH, a little flamming dot in the sky is passing by!

So, in an FE'ers state of mind, I suppose the question should be restated like this: "Have you ever been hit by a comet or asteroid?"

In that case.  No.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #6 on: February 28, 2007, 06:30:37 AM »
Have you ever seen an asteroid or coment IRL?

Millions have.  That's why there's people out in the dark when they come around.

I mean one's that aren't easily faked. OH, a little flamming dot in the sky is passing by!

So, in an FE'ers state of mind, I suppose the question should be restated like this: "Have you ever been hit by a comet or asteroid?"

In that case.  No.

Therefore, asteroid's and comets and the like are all part of the conspiracy

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #7 on: February 28, 2007, 06:31:44 AM »
Have you ever seen an asteroid or coment IRL?

Millions have.  That's why there's people out in the dark when they come around.

I mean one's that aren't easily faked. OH, a little flamming dot in the sky is passing by!

So, in an FE'ers state of mind, I suppose the question should be restated like this: "Have you ever been hit by a comet or asteroid?"

In that case.  No.

Therefore, asteroid's and comets and the like are all part of the conspiracy

Tell that to the person who didn't have asteroid insurance on their car when it got hit by one.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #8 on: February 28, 2007, 06:32:21 AM »
its probably a good idea to note that things CAN move in the sky in FE model. the "upward" acceleration is exactly that. It doesnt mean nothing can move side to side, or even a little bit faster or slower.

If this was inspired by the recent news that a nice, big asteroid may hit earth soon(ish), Then really, well.. Whacks by asteroids is bad for whichever shape planet you live on.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #9 on: February 28, 2007, 06:33:49 AM »
Have you ever seen an asteroid or coment IRL?

Millions have.  That's why there's people out in the dark when they come around.

I mean one's that aren't easily faked. OH, a little flamming dot in the sky is passing by!

So, in an FE'ers state of mind, I suppose the question should be restated like this: "Have you ever been hit by a comet or asteroid?"

In that case.  No.

Therefore, asteroid's and comets and the like are all part of the conspiracy

Tell that to the person who didn't have asteroid insurance on their car when it got hit by one.

LOL
dun worry, that person was reimbursed by the government, since that person obviously agreed to be part of the asteroid conspiracy.

If this was inspired by the recent news that a nice, big asteroid may hit earth soon(ish), Then really, well.. Whacks by asteroids is bad for whichever shape planet you live on.

Oh, and that news is conspiracy.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #10 on: February 28, 2007, 06:34:13 AM »
its probably a good idea to note that things CAN move in the sky in FE model. the "upward" acceleration is exactly that. It doesnt mean nothing can move side to side, or even a little bit faster or slower.

If this was inspired by the recent news that a nice, big asteroid may hit earth soon(ish), Then really, well.. Whacks by asteroids is bad for whichever shape planet you live on.

OH RLY?

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2007, 06:37:33 AM »
its probably a good idea to note that things CAN move in the sky in FE model. the "upward" acceleration is exactly that. It doesnt mean nothing can move side to side, or even a little bit faster or slower.

If this was inspired by the recent news that a nice, big asteroid may hit earth soon(ish), Then really, well.. Whacks by asteroids is bad for whichever shape planet you live on.

OH RLY?

Id say so. Seasons are explained in the FE model, so the sun can move "side to side" along with being in an orbit, so yes, i'd say things can move side to side, etc, in an FE model.

As for the asteroid news, sure. it could be conspiracy. We'll find out in ~35 years whether it is or not.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2007, 06:42:01 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.
Monochrome morality, almost as much a misnomer as the ridiculous prejudices that it is oft based.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2007, 06:45:23 AM »
Fail what?

... "Can asteroids exist in an FE model?", "Sure, why not?"

I'm not sure where you got the idea they dont exist from.



Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2007, 06:47:09 AM »
Half the people here say they do, half don't. I'm failing the half that thinks it's a conspiracy.

I really should quote, but I don't like simplemachines forums, and they don't like me, so...
Monochrome morality, almost as much a misnomer as the ridiculous prejudices that it is oft based.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2007, 06:56:51 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2007, 06:57:48 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2007, 07:00:23 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

google is an evil empire.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #18 on: February 28, 2007, 07:01:41 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

google is an evil empire.

Evil empire of what?

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #19 on: February 28, 2007, 07:03:01 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

google is an evil empire.

Evil empire of what?


Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #20 on: February 28, 2007, 07:04:43 AM »
    * Aorounga Crater (Chad)
    * Barringer Crater, aka Meteor Crater (Arizona, US) :: http://www.barringercrater.com/
    * Bosumtwi crater (Ghana)
    * Chesapeake Bay impact crater (Maryland, US)
    * Chicxulub, Extinction Event Crater (Mexico)
    * Clearwater Lakes (Quebec, Canada)
    * Connolly Basin crater (Western Australia)
    * Deep Bay crater (Saskatchewan, Canada)
    * Gosses Bluff crater (Australia)
    * Haughton impact crater (Nunavut, Canada)
    * Kaali crater (Estonia)
    * Kara-Kul crater (Tajikistan)
    * Kebira crater (Libya/Egypt)
    * Lonar crater (India)
    * Mahuika crater (New Zealand)
    * Manicouagan Reservoir (Quebec, Canada)
    * Manson crater (Iowa, US)
    * Mistastin crater (Labrador, Canada)

There's a list. And I already put the site to one of them.
Monochrome morality, almost as much a misnomer as the ridiculous prejudices that it is oft based.

?

cheeseykhfan

  • 75
  • licensed forum troll since 2004
Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #21 on: February 28, 2007, 07:56:38 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

google is an evil empire.

even though flate earthers get their ice wall pictures from google?

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #22 on: February 28, 2007, 08:00:07 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

google is an evil empire.

even though flate earthers get their ice wall pictures from google?

Even if they did, pictures aren't an admissible form of evidence.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #23 on: February 28, 2007, 08:07:43 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

google is an evil empire.

even though flate earthers get their ice wall pictures from google?

Even if they did, pictures aren't an admissible form of evidence.

He's correct. Not all FE'ers are the same, just like all RE'er are not the same.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #24 on: February 28, 2007, 08:37:52 AM »
There is physical and geological evidence of such, before any country was capable of that scale of destruction.

Fail.

Prove it.

Look up the giant craters on google.

google is an evil empire.

even though flate earthers get their ice wall pictures from google?

Even if they did, pictures aren't an admissible form of evidence.

He's correct. Not all FE'ers are the same, just like all RE'er are not the same.

Wtf does that have to do with anything?

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #25 on: February 28, 2007, 08:52:25 AM »
Wtf does that have to do with anything?

Exactly what it says, I guess. regardless of who's posting them, pictures are an inadmissible form of evidence.
the pictures part came from someone bringing up the fact that the pictures from Diego's now famous "my trip to the icewall" thread were most likely Googled. Google being brought up as a tool to find evidence of asteroid impacts on earth, and being rejected, because, Google is an evil empire.


Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #26 on: February 28, 2007, 08:55:31 AM »
Wtf does that have to do with anything?

Exactly what it says, I guess. regardless of who's posting them, pictures are an inadmissible form of evidence.
the pictures part came from someone bringing up the fact that the pictures from Diego's now famous "my trip to the icewall" thread were most likely Googled. Google being brought up as a tool to find evidence of asteroid impacts on earth, and being rejected, because, Google is an evil empire.



So what your saying is EVERYONE needs to go see these craters for themselves in order for them to be real evidence?

?

cheeseykhfan

  • 75
  • licensed forum troll since 2004
Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #27 on: February 28, 2007, 08:56:42 AM »
Wtf does that have to do with anything?

Exactly what it says, I guess. regardless of who's posting them, pictures are an inadmissible form of evidence.
the pictures part came from someone bringing up the fact that the pictures from Diego's now famous "my trip to the icewall" thread were most likely Googled. Google being brought up as a tool to find evidence of asteroid impacts on earth, and being rejected, because, Google is an evil empire.



So what your saying is EVERYONE needs to go see these craters for themselves in order for them to be real evidence?
apparently
but then if you did you would be a part of the conspiracy of course

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #28 on: February 28, 2007, 08:59:16 AM »
Wtf does that have to do with anything?

Exactly what it says, I guess. regardless of who's posting them, pictures are an inadmissible form of evidence.
the pictures part came from someone bringing up the fact that the pictures from Diego's now famous "my trip to the icewall" thread were most likely Googled. Google being brought up as a tool to find evidence of asteroid impacts on earth, and being rejected, because, Google is an evil empire.



So what your saying is EVERYONE needs to go see these craters for themselves in order for them to be real evidence?
apparently
but then if you did you would be a part of the conspiracy of course

Oooo, now I want to go see them so I can start getting some of this cash that NASA has so much of.

Re: DO Asteroids Exist (in FE Hypothesis)?
« Reply #29 on: February 28, 2007, 09:00:01 AM »
No. What I'm saying is thats what lead to the thread ending with Pictures are Inadmissible as evidence.

Which may, or may not make proving the existence of these craters difficult.