Overview

  • 17 Replies
  • 4804 Views
?

Baffled

Overview
« on: February 27, 2007, 09:39:42 PM »
It is clear that any logical scientific argument can be disputed by saying that it is a conspiracy, however unlikely it is that there would be a conspiracy consisting of thousands of people without any leaks.

Physical evidence seems to be disputed by complicated scientific theories which are counterintuitive.

The fact that the map which is created would have countries in the south incredibly elongated horizontally and be impossible to navigate with a normal map, ugh whatever.

Therefore there is no way to prove to someone that the earth is round on this site other than to physically to cross the Antarctic.  I assume that the argument against others who have been to the Antarctica and written about it is that they are part of the conspiracy or that they were written by people who didn't go there.

Anyway, my question is, why hasn't anyone from this group gone to the south pole to find the ice guards or attempted to do anything real about it.  If your theory were proved to be true you would be heroes.  If this is what you truly believe why don't you stop talking about it and try to prove it.

I don't know why I even post this, the theory and the science and essentially everything about this idea is ridiculous.  Perhaps if it were only an exercise in argument and not really someone's beliefs I would play along more but after reading some of the explanations I don't really even want to try.  I really just want people to answer why they haven't done anything to attempt the disprove that the earth round.  Oh, I also still kinda want to know how that map works with navigation.  People managed to navigate before GPS so don't give me any of that BS.  Also, can you explain seasons, and the lengths of the days?

?

Pappy

  • 30
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #1 on: February 27, 2007, 09:42:01 PM »
dude, i aint gonna read all of that
fuck nerds

*

avaholik

  • 115
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #2 on: February 27, 2007, 09:53:42 PM »
dude, i aint gonna read all of that

lmao!


*

Midnight

  • 7669
  • +0/-0
  • RE/FE Apathetic.
Re: Overview
« Reply #3 on: February 27, 2007, 10:03:17 PM »
dude, i aint gonna read all of that

Can you?
My problem with his ideas is that it is a ridiculous thing.

Genius. PURE, undiluted genius.

Re: Overview
« Reply #4 on: February 27, 2007, 10:04:42 PM »
dude, i aint gonna read all of that

Can you?

reading for more than 2-3 minutes is fatal, its a known fact. i cant believe you didnt know that

?

Pappy

  • 30
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #5 on: February 27, 2007, 10:05:49 PM »
oh fo sho.. i just aint gonna 5 mins of my life reading that
fuck nerds

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: Overview
« Reply #6 on: February 27, 2007, 10:48:25 PM »
oh fo sho.. i just aint gonna 5 mins of my life reading that
It took me about thirty seconds (if that) to read the whole post...::)

~D-Draw

*

avaholik

  • 115
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #7 on: February 27, 2007, 10:58:41 PM »
oh fo sho.. i just aint gonna 5 mins of my life reading that
It took me about thirty seconds (if that) to read the whole post...::)

~D-Draw

do you want us to clap for you?

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: Overview
« Reply #8 on: February 27, 2007, 11:00:18 PM »

do you want us to clap for you?

No, although a cookie and a nice parade would be simply grand.

~D-Draw

*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • +0/-0
  • The Reverse Engineer
Re: Overview
« Reply #9 on: February 27, 2007, 11:16:41 PM »
Someone didn't read the FAQ.  Mr. Baffled...

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: Overview
« Reply #10 on: February 27, 2007, 11:40:42 PM »
Someone didn't read the FAQ.  Mr. Baffled...


Agreed.


Re: why haven't we gone - why would we spend so much money to prove something we already know?

*

Mr. Ireland

  • 14986
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #11 on: February 28, 2007, 05:50:49 AM »
oh fo sho.. i just aint gonna 5 mins of my life reading that
It took me about thirty seconds (if that) to read the whole post...::)

~D-Draw

Show off...

Re: Overview
« Reply #12 on: February 28, 2007, 06:25:46 AM »
dude, i aint gonna read all of that

Can you?

reading for more than 2-3 minutes is fatal, its a known fact. i cant believe you didnt know that

your are a follower of GWB.

?

Solace

  • 82
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #13 on: February 28, 2007, 06:28:48 AM »
dude, i aint gonna read all of that

Can you?

reading for more than 2-3 minutes is fatal, its a known fact. i cant believe you didnt know that

your are a follower of GWB.

Sadly, I laughed at this.

?

ChaosRequiem

  • 111
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #14 on: February 28, 2007, 06:45:24 AM »
Me as well.
Monochrome morality, almost as much a misnomer as the ridiculous prejudices that it is oft based.

*

sokarul

  • 19303
  • +1/-1
  • Extra Racist
Re: Overview
« Reply #15 on: February 28, 2007, 06:52:22 AM »
Someone didn't read the FAQ.  Mr. Baffled...


Agreed.


Re: why haven't we gone - why would we spend so much money to prove something we already know?

lol yes proved wink wink. 
ANNIHILATOR OF  SHIFTER

It's no slur if it's fact.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: Overview
« Reply #16 on: February 28, 2007, 02:26:51 PM »
Someone didn't read the FAQ.  Mr. Baffled...


Agreed.


Re: why haven't we gone - why would we spend so much money to prove something we already know?

lol yes proved wink wink. 


That makes no sense. Wink Wink

?

Wolfwood

  • 2328
  • +0/-0
Re: Overview
« Reply #17 on: February 28, 2007, 02:36:58 PM »
Yanno just because cameras were born of science doesn't really make their pictures "scientific evidence"....
Quote from: BOGWarrior89

I'm giving you five points for that one