Phenomenon of Falling

  • 62 Replies
  • 10582 Views
?

Rorschach

  • 30
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #30 on: February 25, 2007, 02:49:48 PM »
If you could find an indefinite thermal, yes.  Hang gliders don't create enough lift to completely off set 'gravity', so eventually, you would contact the earth.

Ok one more question.

How does a helium ballon fly? wouldn't UA push it to earth?

or are there things lighter than air on FE?

(sorry if this sounds stupid, but FE really confuses me)

*

Pyrochimp

  • 577
  • +0/-0
  • Senator Awesome
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #31 on: February 25, 2007, 02:50:45 PM »
UA means Universal Acceleration right? So everything is accelerating. I am accelerating, you are accelerating and everyone else is accelerating. Why does acceleration only apply while in contact with the Earth, what is forcing the Earth upwards that only works on celestial bodies?

Or did the government attach giant rocket boosters on the back of the Earth, to make the Earth seem more plausibly round.
It's accelerating the bottom of the Earth, but obviously we aren't coming in contact with the accelerator itself, so we only feel the acceleration while in contact with the Earth due to the fact that the Earth is accelerating and we are not.

~D-Draw

Why can't we see a similar accelerator on the moon, sun, and stars?  They're accelerating at the same rate as Earth.
Some people are ****ing stupid! ~ George Carlin

Mathematical proof of the flat Earth:
[{(Diameter of Earth)*(tan[distance from Earth to sun/distance from North pole to equator])}2]/0

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #32 on: February 25, 2007, 02:50:59 PM »
If you could find an indefinite thermal, yes.  Hang gliders don't create enough lift to completely off set 'gravity', so eventually, you would contact the earth.

Ok one more question.

How does a helium ballon fly? wouldn't UA push it to earth?

or are there things lighter than air on FE?

(sorry if this sounds stupid, but FE really confuses me)
Helium is less dense than air.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #33 on: February 25, 2007, 02:51:26 PM »
Ok, let me rephrase again, and could you please give me a straight answer to how you perceive the question instead if telling me to go do something else (or something to that effect)?

If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?

?

bacardi2cola

  • 133
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #34 on: February 25, 2007, 02:51:29 PM »
or are there things lighter than air on FE?
(sorry if this sounds stupid, but FE really confuses me)

I believe that there are such things as lighter than air objects in FE. It cannot disprove any statements in the FE theory, so why not?

*

Pyrochimp

  • 577
  • +0/-0
  • Senator Awesome
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #35 on: February 25, 2007, 02:53:27 PM »
Okay, analogy time.  Let's say the airplane is Earth, and the objects are people.  If UA only applied to the airplane and not the objects on the airplane, then the objects would stay in the same place on the airplane, like people on Earth.  They're being accelerated at the same rate as the airplane since there's no other force directly acting on them.  However, if the airplane AND the objects were being accelerated by the same mystery force, the objects would accelerate ahead of the airplane, since they have much less mass but are being affected by the exact same force in the exact same way.
Exactly.
I'm glad we agree, but that doesn't really answer my original question.  What's this UA that effects Earth and every other celestial body known but not the things on Earth?
Some people are ****ing stupid! ~ George Carlin

Mathematical proof of the flat Earth:
[{(Diameter of Earth)*(tan[distance from Earth to sun/distance from North pole to equator])}2]/0

?

Mental

  • 159
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #36 on: February 25, 2007, 02:54:05 PM »
Ok, let me rephrase again, and could you please give me a straight answer to how you perceive the question instead if telling me to go do something else (or something to that effect)?

If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?

Listen son. It has been discused, at least 10 times since I'm a member of this forum.

And I have been a member for two days. Do a forum search.
Madre de Dios! Es el Pollo Diablo!

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #37 on: February 25, 2007, 02:56:09 PM »
Ok, let me rephrase again, and could you please give me a straight answer to how you perceive the question instead if telling me to go do something else (or something to that effect)?

If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?

Listen son. It has been discused, at least 10 times since I'm a member of this forum.

And I have been a member for two days. Do a forum search.

I would rather not trawl through 20 pages of search results when I could get a straight answer right here.

It's human nature to take the easy route, is it not?

?

Mental

  • 159
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #38 on: February 25, 2007, 02:57:41 PM »
Ok, let me rephrase again, and could you please give me a straight answer to how you perceive the question instead if telling me to go do something else (or something to that effect)?

If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?

Listen son. It has been discused, at least 10 times since I'm a member of this forum.

And I have been a member for two days. Do a forum search.

I would rather not trawl through 20 pages of search results when I could get a straight answer right here.

It's human nature to take the easy route, is it not?

Yes it is.

Do a forum search.
Madre de Dios! Es el Pollo Diablo!

?

bacardi2cola

  • 133
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #39 on: February 25, 2007, 02:58:59 PM »
It's human nature to take the easy route, is it not?

Which is why things that believe in FE are not human.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #40 on: February 25, 2007, 02:59:57 PM »
If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?
1.  Yes.
2.  Yes.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #41 on: February 25, 2007, 03:01:09 PM »
If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?
1.  Yes.
2.  Yes.

For 2;

Then why aren't we all horribly crushed to death? Simple answer please, no complicated maths and yadda yadda.

?

bacardi2cola

  • 133
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #42 on: February 25, 2007, 03:02:10 PM »
In their theory, the force of acceleration is amount to that of what the force of gravity would apply to objects on the Earth.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #43 on: February 25, 2007, 03:02:45 PM »
We are accelerating at 9.8m/s^2.  One g.  Which is also known as the acceleration due to gravity.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #44 on: February 25, 2007, 03:05:09 PM »
If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?
1.  Yes.
2.  Yes.

For 2;

Then why aren't we all horribly crushed to death? Simple answer please, no complicated maths and yadda yadda.

I'm just curious to hear the FE answer to this, to increase my overall understanding of people's beliefs and understandings of the universe we inhabit.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #45 on: February 25, 2007, 03:06:10 PM »
Look above your post.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Mental

  • 159
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #46 on: February 25, 2007, 03:08:49 PM »
If the Earth is constantly accelerating, wouldn't we;

a) Be travelling at an incredibly high velocity by now?
b) All be forced into the Earth similar to the way we are forced backwards into our forward facing seat when accelerating at a high rate forwards?
1.  Yes.
2.  Yes.

For 2;

Then why aren't we all horribly crushed to death? Simple answer please, no complicated maths and yadda yadda.

I'm just curious to hear the FE answer to this, to increase my overall understanding of people's beliefs and understandings of the universe we inhabit.

Seriously, go to a library and ask for "Basic mechanics" or sth like that, if you're interested, it'll be a good reading. You can also search the wikipedia, explanations there are much more thorough
Madre de Dios! Es el Pollo Diablo!

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #47 on: February 25, 2007, 03:10:48 PM »
Okay, I understand that (I think).

So, what's outside the Earth and the bits and bobs that come with us? Acceleration is defined as the rate of change of velocity, correct? And velocity can be defined as the rate of change of displacement, again, correct? And displacement is the direct, straight line distance from a point, so there has to be some fixed point from which acceleration can be garnered. What is this place? It can't be nothing, or an arbitrary point, as that nullifies the whole acceleration argument.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #48 on: February 25, 2007, 03:12:09 PM »
Drop a pen.  There is your fixed point.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #49 on: February 25, 2007, 03:13:18 PM »
So my fixed point for an accelerating object is inside the accelerating object, okay.

Again, what's outside the Flanet?

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #50 on: February 25, 2007, 03:14:21 PM »
So my fixed point for an accelerating object is inside the accelerating object, okay.
Sure, why not?  The pen is no longer accelerating, so what's the problem?


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #51 on: February 25, 2007, 03:15:38 PM »
I never said there was one, I said 'Okay'.

For the third time, if you know, what is outside the Flanet?

If you don't know, then speculate.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #52 on: February 25, 2007, 03:16:19 PM »
Space.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

I R RE

  • 22
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #53 on: February 25, 2007, 03:17:43 PM »
Are there other Flanet's out there? Or is it just an entirely empty and infinite area?

?

Careem

Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #54 on: February 25, 2007, 03:17:58 PM »
As a RE bro, When I drop a feather it falls to the ground due to gravity.  As it falls, it softly and gracefully glides back and forth threw the air because of its air resistance.  The feather also loses speed and gains speed as it rotates due to the air resistance.

So if the earth is accelerating upwards, wouldn't the speed of the feather hitting the earth appear to be consistantly accelerating?  

?

Mental

  • 159
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #55 on: February 25, 2007, 03:19:28 PM »
As a RE bro, When I drop a feather it falls to the ground due to gravity.  As it falls, it softly and gracefully glides back and forth threw the air because of its air resistance.  The feather also loses speed and gains speed as it rotates due to the air resistance.

So if the earth is accelerating upwards, wouldn't the speed of the feather hitting the earth appear to be consistantly accelerating?   

Of course not, are you saying that air resistance isn't possible on the FE?

Or have i misunderstood sth?
Madre de Dios! Es el Pollo Diablo!

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #56 on: February 25, 2007, 03:20:04 PM »
If it wasn't for air resistance, yes.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

?

Alegoo92

  • 25
  • +0/-0
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #57 on: February 25, 2007, 03:21:54 PM »
The earth is accelerating.  When you jump, you increase your velocity relative to the earth.  As the earth accelerates, it catches up to you.

Sorry. When you jump off an accellerating object you accelerate with it, at a higher rate. And even if due to other factors, the Earth wouldnt  catch up to things the way it does.

*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #58 on: February 25, 2007, 03:22:47 PM »
The earth is accelerating.  When you jump, you increase your velocity relative to the earth.  As the earth accelerates, it catches up to you.

Sorry. When you jump off an accellerating object you accelerate with it, at a higher rate.
Right. Until your feet leave the ground.


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: Phenomenon of Falling
« Reply #59 on: February 25, 2007, 03:23:17 PM »
Are there other Flanet's out there? Or is it just an entirely empty and infinite area?
Do you want to go check?

~D-Draw