Do you believe in just about evry astronomical definition, law, or anythign evr?

My telescope would melt.   

Luckily I found a NASA photoshoped image of the event for my avatar.

Do a search.  The dome idea has been around for a long time.  It is also much bigger than you are assuming.  Here is a to-scale diagram of the FE and sun.  The little speck in the left of center is the sun.  Asteroids are near or above the level of the sun, putting them inside the dome to begin with. 

If this is true how come it is possible to obtain an asteroid made of iron, that has a different molecular structure to iron formed on the earth? The structure of iron formed in space can be observed to have a differnet arrangement to iron formed on earth because the iron was formed with no oxygen present.

And what exactly do you think asteroids are?

looks like the earth is round to me...

wtf is this thread about?

definative proof that the earth is not flat.

And as posted above.... are the many many problems with the FE model that FE-ers cannot explain. Which od further proof the earth is not flat

which means right. The FE model is a load of puppy cock.

And those of yu who think the earth is flat... well, i am not going to try and persuade you otherwise.. but please... open your eyes to the obvious holes inthe FE model that you cannot explain.

And those of yu who think the earth is flat... well, i am not going to try and persuade you otherwise.. but please... open your eyes to the obvious holes inthe FE model that you cannot explain. 

That sounds like attempted persuasion.   

Quote from: lucky on March 10, 2007, 02:39:15 AM

And those of yu who think the earth is flat... well, i am not going to try and persuade you otherwise.. but please... open your eyes to the obvious holes inthe FE model that you cannot explain. 

That sounds like attempted persuasion.   

Well.... obviously FE-ers lose lah... so many flaws in their FE model. Might as well of come out of a science fiction book.... and a cheap one at that...

See, as I understand it Flat Earthers have a lot of theories explaining the way our universe is devised. This is probably the saddest part of your belief: you're contradicting the most basic laws of physics, making up excuses for giant theoretical flaws, and even disputing fact that came about hundreds of years ago.

First of all, you believe that the Earth is the center of the universe??? How? A guy by the name of Galileo disproved this theory almost 400 years ago! Check out the Copernican Theory of the Universe for the geometric undeniable proof that the Earth is not the center.

Secondly, in your FE model, stars are only a few thousand miles from the Earth? So then I guess that you think suns are half-pluto sized light bulbs that only produce enough energy to power Miami for a day... Wrong. The intense heat from stars being that close to us would immediately destory everything on the planet. Plus, have you ever heard of a supernova? (I know, all government nonsense, right?) If just one star died and it was the farthest star from us in your model the Earth would be engulfed in a wave of heat thousands of degrees above the sun's normal level!

Thirdly, I have heard it stated that you do not believe in gravity. Can this be true? Gravity's precense has been known since the BC era! The reason for gravity is spinning, every atom on Earth has forms of protons, neutrons, and electrons, which all spin. This causes the phenomena of all objects pulling towards each other.
There is alot (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Law_of_universal_gravitation) of math behind this too... Either way, if you disagree with the basic laws of gravity, you are also in opposition to all of Quantam physics and much of nuclear physical explanation as well.

Fourthly, you have said that all heavenly bodies are observed in two dimensions, and thus are two dimensional bodies. This is further from the truth than fathomable! The reason for depth (the third dimension) appearing in a picture is because of shadow and lighting.

In figure A, you see an image as seen through wash lighting, where depth can be shown with shadows on and casted from the object. In space however, depth cannot be observed, because the surroundings of any celestial body are empty and cannot contain light. Without surrounding light, the body's other sides do not reflect and do not appear to exist.
In either case with this, why would so many three dimensional objects exist on our planet while everything else is flat and 2D?

Back to gravity. Your explanation for the absense of gravity is that all bodies in the universe are accelerating upward at 9.8m/s/s. I do understand where your logic was when you formulated this explanation, but it is a completely impossible theory.
When you made this upward acceleration explanation you were basing it off of the current laws of physics.
--
For example, if a man is standing on a platform, and then the platform is sent into the sky, the man will be experience the sensation of becoming heavier due to the verticle air pressure rising. The vertical air pressure (air pressure above and below him, in this case above) is only rising because the air above him is sitting still while he rushes through it.. This combination of air pressure and gravity push and pull at the man so he wiil feel a downward attraction.
--
This is the logic formulated in your 'theory'. In your theory, however, everything is moving, so no downward attraction will be experienced since nothing is sitting to push down on objects. Because of this your theory is null. Also: I don't know where you pulled your numbers from. You said all objects are accelerating at 9.8 m/s/s. Why did you use this number, since it was formulated in coherance with the G-Force Scale (1G).

This is actually a small list of fundamental flaws I found in your beliefs. I also find it very, very odd that you call each other brothers... that's quite cultish of you...

Please! Respond with retorts, comments, support, opposition, idc, but dont leave questions unanswered. And if you find that people are proving you wrong...start to try to believe and let go of what your holding on to so hard...

Alex

Yes, we learned that in our Physics. The law of physics, That the Earth is flat rather than a sphere. But I don't know better what is real.



_________________
California Orange County Lawyer