« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

On Arguements Involving the FAQ

  • 1 Replies
  • 1254 Views
?

astronomy101

  • 297
  • +0/-0
On Arguements Involving the FAQ
« on: February 21, 2007, 01:44:55 PM »
I do not believe articles involving the Flat Earth FAQ are quite substancial. SO what if all the information on the FE hypothesis is not explained in it? Maybe if they put all their views in a book, all their experiments and everything they have, it would be more valuable. (what did I just say??)

Anyways, keep away from arguements involving the FAQ, you can clearly make better arguements involving science, can't you?
Logged
Imperious, choleric, irascible, extreme in everything, with a dissolute imagination the like of which has never been seen, atheistic to the point of fanaticism, there you have me in a nutshell.... Kill me again or take me as I am, for I shall not change.
?

Science!

  • 60
  • +0/-0
Re: On Arguements Involving the FAQ
« Reply #1 on: February 21, 2007, 01:46:57 PM »
The FAQ is full of holes because the author didn't have the creativity to answer all of his own questions. It's not an answer book, especially when the topic is basically a joke anyway.
Logged
Tom Bishop is a moron.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »