A mathimatical proof for a round earth

  • 13 Replies
  • 2507 Views
?

fasda

A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« on: February 20, 2007, 02:17:02 PM »
first using the figures provided on this website determine the theoretical angle of the sun on the equinox for your latitude using basic trig.
Now on the next several equinoxes           Mar                Sept             measure the actual angle is and you will find a severe discrepancy 
                                               2007     21     18:06   23    09:51  that is irreconcilable with a flat earth model.
                                               2008     20     23:59     22    15:44    
                                               2009     20     05:45     22    21:18    
                                               2010    20     11:28     23    03:09    
                                               2011    20     17:16     23    09:04    
                                               2012    20     23:09     22    14:49    
                                               2013    20     05:04     22    20:44    
                                               2014    20     10:51     23    02:29    

*

Splox

  • 76
  • +0/-0
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #1 on: February 20, 2007, 06:16:55 PM »
I wrote about something pretty similar here:
http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=10571.0

My thread shows the sunset problem that can't be solved with a FE model.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2007, 11:52:47 PM by Splox »

Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #2 on: February 20, 2007, 07:00:50 PM »
FE'rs response:  ALL LIES! GOVERNMENT PWNZRD U!!! LOLZZ!!!shift+1

?

quadz0

  • 12
  • +0/-0
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #3 on: February 20, 2007, 07:08:53 PM »
^lol
see how none of the flat-asswipes are responding to this?

*

Dioptimus Drime

  • 4531
  • +0/-0
  • Meep.
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #4 on: February 20, 2007, 09:04:10 PM »
Why is that wrong on a flat Earth model? Also, I don't think anyone else in this thread actually understood it either; they're just pretending they did because it looks important.

~D-Draw

?

Wolfwood

  • 2328
  • +0/-0
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #5 on: February 20, 2007, 09:28:18 PM »
Why is that wrong on a flat Earth model? Also, I don't think anyone else in this thread actually understood it either; they're just pretending they did because it looks important.

~D-Draw

I see no numbers belonging to the RE model to compare them to.
Quote from: BOGWarrior89

I'm giving you five points for that one


?

Tom Bishop

Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #6 on: February 20, 2007, 09:48:48 PM »
I see neither mathematics nor proof in this thread.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #7 on: February 20, 2007, 09:55:03 PM »
If you're so sure the numbers won't add up, post them.

?

Kasroa Is Gone

  • 6863
  • +0/-0
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #8 on: February 20, 2007, 09:56:21 PM »
I really want this thread to make sense but it doesn't. I like this one though http://theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=10571.0

*

beast

  • 2997
  • +0/-0
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #9 on: February 21, 2007, 12:14:50 AM »
I see neither mathematics nor proof in this thread.

Exactly.

How do we even know that the figures quoted are correct?  You don't tell us where they come from, and you don't actually show us the maths.  All your doing is stating that something is the case, without putting forward any evidence to back it up.

This topic fails.

?

fasda

Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #10 on: February 24, 2007, 08:13:17 PM »
OK you want numbers? Well I'm sorry to say don't have them but if you are so doubtful of my claim of a rounded earth you can do do it yourself and you only have to wait 25 more days before you can apply the theory which I provided for you. Also If you are not well versed in trigonometry then all you have to do is take the tangent inverse also know as arctangent of the distance of the sun divided by the distance from the equator.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #11 on: February 24, 2007, 09:05:39 PM »
OK you want numbers? Well I'm sorry to say don't have them but if you are so doubtful of my claim of a rounded earth you can do do it yourself and you only have to wait 25 more days before you can apply the theory which I provided for you. Also If you are not well versed in trigonometry then all you have to do is take the tangent inverse also know as arctangent of the distance of the sun divided by the distance from the equator.

Well if you don't have them, how do you know they're correct?

?

fasda

Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #12 on: February 24, 2007, 09:20:49 PM »
Quote from: Rick_James link=topic=10687.msg132283#msg132283 date=1172379939
Well if you don't have them, how do you know they're correct?
[/quote

well I have taken 2 semesters of calculus which gave me more then enough knowledge of trig to know what will happen and I am very certain the earth is round and if you don't believe it the experiment in the first post should be enough proof. However if that experiment is not enough proof then your hopeless and will remain ignorant of the truth forever.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Re: A mathimatical proof for a round earth
« Reply #13 on: February 26, 2007, 04:17:27 AM »
Quote from: Rick_James link=topic=10687.msg132283#msg132283 date=1172379939
Well if you don't have them, how do you know they're correct?
[/quote

well I have taken 2 semesters of calculus which gave me more then enough knowledge of trig to know what will happen and I am very certain the earth is round and if you don't believe it the experiment in the first post should be enough proof. However if that experiment is not enough proof then your hopeless and will remain ignorant of the truth forever.

Well, if you're so well versed in mathematics, that you can predict the outcome in your mind, it shouldn't be too much trouble to write your claims out for us, will it?