Have you guys ever heard of the principle "The simplest answer is probably the right one."? You have this huge faq that is attempting to explain something, when it would be much simpler (as in, it would solve all of your problems with the FE theory) to just say that the Earth is round? ALL evidence points to the obvious fact that the Earth is round.
You guys claim in your faq that the Earth doesn't have a gravitational pull, its just acceleration "upward" at 9.8 m/s^2. Oh really? What is causing this acceleration? Because according to newton's second law, if there is an acceleration, there must be a net force acting on the object. What magical force is causing this acceleration? You also say that every body in space is accelerating upwards like that. Well what the hell is causing all of the different accelerations? Because I hope you all know the sun has a very different gravitational pull than the Earth. Which would imply it is acceleration a lot quicker than the Earth. This means that the Sun is actually getting farther and farther away from the Earth. This poses a problem however, as eventually, the distance between the Earth and Sun would become really huge REALLY quickly and we would no longer have a sun. This obviously isn't the case since the sun is in the same spot everyday of the year. You have to remember, no acceleration can take place without a force acting on it. Where are all of these forces coming from? If you assume (correctly) that the Earth is round, all of these discrepancies are fixed. The Earth, and all the other planets go around the Sun which is "stationary" in regards to the rest of the solar system. But the whole solar system is going around the galaxy which physicists believe has a super massive black hole at the center causing all of the motion of the galaxy.
Speaking of black holes, explain them in the context of your gravity "theory". Because it is a scientific fact that black holes exist. They have been observed in space countless times either traveling through space and disrupting the light traveling around it, or actually feeding on nearby stars. Explain this phenomenon.
Also, what about the slingshot affect of planets? If you travel around them, the gravity of the planet will slingshot your spacecraft around at high speeds. I suppose this affect was also made up? :roll:
And I'm sorry, but a flat Earth is not a stable Earth. As far as physics goes, the most stable form for a large body to take is a sphere. That is because gravity (the attraction between two masses) will ALWAYS form spheres. All the matter will be attracted to each other and form a ball. The Earth would fold on top of itself and keep folding and crunching until it formed this ball.
I could go on and on and on with how ridiculous it is to even suggest that the Earth is flat, but I have to get to class. It seems to me that whenever someone provides proof against your theory, you explain it away as being faked. Well, there comes a time when things stop being fake and you start being idiots. If the Earth was flat, the entire physical world would have to be reshaped to fit that model. Gravity wouldn't be gravity, force wouldn't be force, etc. etc. The entire universe would not work in our understanding of physics. And for what? Because if looks like it is flat if you look at it with your naked eyes? Well, sorry, but with something as large as the Earth, you can't see the curvature (directly). Get a life please.