Supernovas in the FE theory

  • 38 Replies
  • 8939 Views
*

Dead Kangaroo

  • FES' Anchor Roo
  • The Elder Ones
  • 4551
  • +0/-0
  • K800 Model 101.
Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #30 on: February 19, 2007, 08:32:11 PM »
What makes you think supernovas are problematic in the FE theory?
It means the torch is broke.

?

Christopher Columbo

  • 84
  • +0/-0
  • Mad l33t 80's show detective and famous explorer!
Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #31 on: February 19, 2007, 08:34:33 PM »
Why must it wipe out the entire solar system?

Why must your reading skills vanish when I ask you to read the links provided on the data of a Supernova?
sailed the earth all around it  even the round part and all with my trusty detective cloak

Quote from: unionjack
Holy shit its christopher columbo.
Quote from: Who and What?
COLUMBO IS THE SHIZNITTTTTT!!!!! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOLOLOL

?

MattWilko

Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #32 on: February 20, 2007, 02:54:21 AM »
Does it matter if the Earth if flat? Does this information change your life in a dramatic way?
NO!!

Unless your a sad twat, but thats not the point, whether the Earth is flat or not does not matter.
It won't change anything.

Has anybody seen the Ice Wall? No? Then what makes you think it exists?

?

Xulfaeon

  • 98
  • +0/-0
Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #33 on: February 20, 2007, 02:43:10 PM »
The Ice Wall exists because faked photos of it say it exists.

?

huerosam

  • 19
  • +0/-0
Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #34 on: February 20, 2007, 03:31:16 PM »
Because its made of the exact same elements of a star and functions the same. I'm sorry  I believe i asked for logical anwsers. Was that part not clear enough for you?
What makes you think the suns functions the same as other stars? Obviously if astronomers were wrong about its shape we shouldn't expect them to be right about the rest of it, should we?

Of course, as I myself see no reason why the sun cannot be round in the FE theory it really doesn't matter.
Uh, what makes you think NASA can't be trusted?
HMM.
BECAUSE YOU SAY SO?

*

unclegravy

  • 957
  • +0/-0
  • I feel so fucking high!!!!!!
Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #35 on: February 20, 2007, 04:20:29 PM »
What makes you think the sun in subjected to these extreme pressures?
Oh god.
So, correct me if I'm wrong, but are you now going on "Rene Descartes" mode and doubting everything and everything and everything and anything?

Golly gee.
EDIT:

So, in addition to other stuff, FE'ers also don't believe that the sun is a star?

Nice.
« Last Edit: February 20, 2007, 05:43:33 PM by unclegravy »
Quote
The people who feast on exclamation marks will never go hungry agaaaain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

?

GeoGuy

Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #36 on: February 20, 2007, 06:14:33 PM »
Of course not, don't be silly. I'm simply asking if Christopher here can actually provide any evidence to support the claims he's making.


?

Christopher Columbo

  • 84
  • +0/-0
  • Mad l33t 80's show detective and famous explorer!
Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #37 on: February 20, 2007, 06:58:31 PM »
Of course not, don't be silly. I'm simply asking if Christopher here can actually provide any evidence to support the claims he's making.



How's that attempt at fusion going for ya?
sailed the earth all around it  even the round part and all with my trusty detective cloak

Quote from: unionjack
Holy shit its christopher columbo.
Quote from: Who and What?
COLUMBO IS THE SHIZNITTTTTT!!!!! LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOOOLOLOL

*

unclegravy

  • 957
  • +0/-0
  • I feel so fucking high!!!!!!
Re: Supernovas in the FE theory
« Reply #38 on: February 21, 2007, 04:00:39 PM »
ChrisCo: lol

GeoGuy: Well, how on earth (and on any other planet) can you prove anything to a guy who goes "How are you sure <insert claim here>?"?

Imagine if we tried to prove to you that 1+1 = 2 :

Us: 1+1 = 2, hold one hand up, and hold the other up, and then count how many hands your holding.
You: Oh? How are you sure what "one" is? *holds up one hand* How are you sure I'm holding one hand now?
Us: Well, count how many hands you're holding. How many do you see?
You: And if I say ten?

You see how hard it is?

I have a proposition: I suggest you tell us in this topic what supernovas are to you, what OUR sun is to you, and what a star is to you. Then, maybe THEN, the argument can go on smoothly without "How do you know the sun is <fork>?"

I mean, if you went on doubting everything, then we're not getting anywhere. Like, any RE'er can say "Up close, the Earth looks round", to support their argument, but we don't say that, because IT'S NOT TRUE.
Quote
The people who feast on exclamation marks will never go hungry agaaaain!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!