Alas, the principle point I which to make in connection with this before going on to jewish topics is that the term nigger is not inherently racist of itself as it does not by definition connotate anything racial at all. To infer that the word refers to black or African people is a racist insult towards those people which is why you are racisr for giving the word that racist meaning. It does no good to quote dictionaries composed by racist white men as the older dictionaries justify what I am saying. Everyone who uses or even classifies the word nigger as a term for people of dark colour or African race is guilty of racism, not to mention bad grammar.
Although you may not consider the word to be inherently racist, the majority of people reading it will. It was a derogitory (sp?) term for Blacks very recently and many people still consider it to be a racially charged term. Just as you "occassionally" use "Jew" or others could use "Gay" to describe things they don't like. You may not hate the group refered to, but people hearing you often will and take offense. To avoid that, you should avoid words that might refer to groups of people or risk being called racist.
2. As to the jews, you and anyone who defends the state of israel are all anti-semitic. I have explained this to you earlier and refuse to do so again. You indicated that you understand yet indicated at the same time that if you continue to never the less use the term anti-semitic in the same wrong way in the future I should understand the sense you mean it in. I do understand that you are implying I am a racist against jews when you say that, but just because you use the term incorrectly, do not be surprised when I use it in the proper context. And if you are lost when i say you are anti-semitic for defending the state of israel, it is only an indication of your wilful ignorance.
I'm unsure of how defending the Jewish people can be classified as anti-semitism. According to various dictionaries anti-semitism is defined as:
Hostility toward or prejudice against Jews or Judaism.
I can't quite understand how defending them could be considered a hostile or prejudiced action against them. And if you try to refute that by saying something like "The jews wrote the dictionary," you are truely an idiot.
And I do believe you are a white racist against arabs and blacks. The kind of jews you support are whites from europe who stole arab land
Semi-true, if you twist the data a little. History usually agrees that they were given the land by the allies after the War, but you could argue that those states had no right to give it to them.
as terrorists who set up an imperialist backed settler state which terrorizes and persecutes the native arab palestinians.
Imperialist implies they have aspirations for more foreign land. Last time I checked, they won the war against the other nine or ten arab nations, and then gave back all military victories. They kept their own state.
And they have given the Palestinians land, or are trying to set up methods to slowly return power to the Palestinians. Just because they refuse to return all land to the Palestinians that was taken 40 years ago and refuse to leave Jerusalem does not mean they are terrorists.
As for the persecution, I would too if my next door neighbors started sending over suicide bombers every other week, my own interests come before anyone else's no matter how rutheless that might sound.
As to why I believe the canadian government is more oppressive than Iran. What I read about the canadian government the most is its curtailment of liberties. You cited one flimsy case of the Iranian government holding someone that knew someone that knew someone that you were associated with. Yeahhhh, right. The Canadian government has a record of arresting, jailing, fining, and imprisoning anyone who publicly questions the veracity of the jewish holocaust myth. At the same time, the canadian government has no problem for people to publicly deny the existence of God.
I wonder why you heard about the Canadian abuse of liberties and not the Iranian ones. Maybe because Iran is under a totalitarian government that does not allow personal freedoms, much less the media to report stories to the rest of the world. The fact that you hear about such things would seem to disprove your assertion that
Canada's censorship of the truth is comparable to what turkey does in jailing and deporting those Armenians who publicize the slaughter of 1915, not to mention their slaughter of the Hellenes in western Asia Minor during the same period.
The canadian government is an uncivilised oppresser which disrespects religion while the Iranian government has a refeshing interest in religion (a rare thing in today's world) and a tolerance for diverse views to evidence its publishing of holocaust revisionist articles by knowledgeable western historians in the Tehran Times.
Once again some actual source would be nice to back up some of these claims. And if you think forced religious conformity or death is a "refreshing interest on religion," I would hazard a guess that you are one of a very small minority.