The idea of the moon being lit by the sun at night is simply ludicrous. If it's dark, it's because there's no sunlight: so how could light be hitting the moon? Think about it.
Clearly, the whole point of the space program was to place giant lamps on the moon that could be remote-controlled from secret radio stations in Colorado, Alaska, and Archangelsk, and other unknown locations. The so-called "phases" of the moon correspond to different configurations of lit and unlit lamps.
The moon is of course a flat disc revolving around the Earth within its own heavenly sphere. You can't "land" on the moon any more than you can land on the ceiling of the room you're sitting in. So while the Russians were putting the lamps on the moon (the Luna missions), the U.S. was orchestrating "landings" to divert our attention away from the lamp operation.
This explains why the French hate Americans so much: the truth of moon lamp conspiracy has forced them to admit that all their precious culture involving ballads mentioning the full moon, or paintings containing crescent moons, etc., was all faked by a team of scientists in a think-tank in Maryland.
-Erasmus
Unless you have a reason for them to have gone to all the trouble to do this, your argument is based in nothingness, and is, therefore, meaningless.
You flat-earthers have so much almost-fact to rely on, why do you keep falling back on conspiracy theories to combat legitamite science?
And this joker:
The sun, most likely not since it's basically a fireball. The moon maybe though. The same side of the moon always faces the Earth no matter what. Does no one wind it slighlty unlikely that it happens to be rotating and orbiting at the exact speeds that would cause the two to, in effect, cancel out and only show one side? The moon therefore, may very well be flat. As for other planets, who know. Gas giants are probably round due simply to their make-up, but other like mars or mercury, I don't think there would be any way of telling.
And so ends my final post as a flat-earther. You guys obviously aren't able to answer even the simplest of questions, so why should I continue to do the work for you if I don't believe it myself?
Prepare to get destroyed 8-)
Its good that you can be so cocky and collected when you have no actual facts backing up your statements, only meaningless opinions that smack of forty-five minutes in a middle-school earth science course, which you've beautifully mangled into a series of claims which are not only baseless, but presented by you in a manner that is aggravating simply because you compose your posts as if your words were fact.
The earth is round. Get over it. There is no
reason for a conspiracy, which therefore means there
isn't one, not to mention that theories are not a basis for argument in a debate of any kind. Additionally, none of you have given any actual scientifically researched facts as evidence. If you can't find any, there's probably a reason for it, that reason being that your cause was lost centuries ago. Until one of you brings some fact to the table, in the form of science, and stop stabbing into the dark with your idiotic conspiracy theories and baseless claims, I suggest you shut up. I'm all for debate, but both sides of a debate have to have something. Round earthers thus far have, to quote the aforementioned joker,
ppppwwwwnnnnneeeedddddddd!!!!!!!!
the flat earthers into the ground with facts, research, and science.
To sum up my post for those of you flat-earthers who seem to skip down to the last line of any rebuttal before posting your argument to it,
Get some facts, don't rely on conspiracies, prove what you are saying, or shut the hell up.