Poll

Pi or Phew?

Pi=3.14159
12 (92.3%)
Phew=3.17157
1 (7.7%)
Still not sure
0 (0%)

Total Members Voted: 13

Voting closed: September 21, 2018, 01:52:10 AM

« previous next »
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]   Go Down

Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157

  • 225 Replies
  • 42374 Views
*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #210 on: October 01, 2018, 06:22:03 PM »
Quote from: Danang on October 01, 2018, 06:18:58 PM
Pi has definite calculations, Pi has some made up calculations.
*** Pi Wins ***
Finality at last!

But we should add Pi has some made up calculations that are still precisely correct!
Logged
*

Danang

  • 5990
  • +27/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #211 on: October 01, 2018, 07:57:07 PM »
Wow Rabinoz was happy over a TYPO.  :o

Here is the corrected post:

"Sooo... Let me conclude this thread...

Phew has definite calculations, Pi has some made up calculations.

*** Phew Wins ***

Case closed.  :')
« Last Edit: October 01, 2018, 08:14:30 PM by Danang »
Logged
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/ ✌
?

Themightykabool

  • 13103
  • +58/-79
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #212 on: October 01, 2018, 08:54:59 PM »
In its basic format pi is a ratio constant between circumference and diameter.
How do you feel that all math has been wrong about one number divided by another?
Logged
?

Themightykabool

  • 13103
  • +58/-79
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #213 on: October 01, 2018, 08:55:33 PM »
And what does this have to do with flat earth?
Logged
*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #214 on: October 01, 2018, 09:45:24 PM »
Quote from: Danang on October 01, 2018, 07:57:07 PM
*** Phew Wins ***
Case closed.  :')
If you want case closed, that is fine.

Your calculation for Phew have no indication that the value produced is the ratio of a circle's circumference to its diameter.
Instead, the value you have is merely 6-2*sqrt(2)=3.1715728752538099023966225515806.
This has no connection to pi, and not really any connection to circles either.

So all you have is a made up formula with no connection to circles at all.

Conversely, you have been provided with a derivation of pi, based upon circles, showing what the correct value is (or limits of it anyway).
This is an ironclad connection to circles and thus is a real formula with a real justification, with definite calculations.

So pi wins.
No matter how much you want to pretend it doesn't, no matter how much you want to pretend your delusional nonsense does; pi wins.
The only way to make it so pi doesn't win is to show the derivation of pi is wrong. Point out what step of the 60 is wrong, with an explanation of why you think it is wrong.
Until you do so, pi wins.
The only way to make it so your delusional nonsense wins is if you can provide a derivation of it which links to C/D. A formula with a random bunch of numbers isn't enough.

Now grow up and either provide an explanation of why some point in the derivation is wrong, specifically applying to a single point, or run away and never return.
Logged
*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #215 on: October 01, 2018, 10:17:25 PM »
Quote from: Danang on October 01, 2018, 06:18:58 PM

"Sooo... Let me conclude this thread...

Pi has definite calculations, Pi has some made up calculations.

*** Pi Wins ***

Case closed.  :')
Too late, you already closed the case!

So, out if the kindness of my heart, I restored you ;) accidentally ;) deleted post deleted.

Logged
*

Danang

  • 5990
  • +27/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #216 on: October 02, 2018, 12:00:54 AM »
Quote from: Themightykabool on October 01, 2018, 08:54:59 PM
In its basic format pi is a ratio constant between circumference and diameter.
How do you feel that all math has been wrong about one number divided by another?

Wow there's still a question.. so when will I close this Phew Winning Thread and celebrate it??  :o  8)

Pi is Wrong because it has failed measurements.

Here is another example:

Pi claim the hatching area equals 0.25859 of the non curved yard i.e. 0.1073. It's around a quarter.
Too narrow I guess.
While Phew says it's 0.45742 of the 0.06066 non curved yard. Nearly a half.

Your eyes decide. Your logic does too. \o/



As to the question: "what does this have to do with flat earth?"

>> Flatearther's spirit is CORRECTION about anything. Not only the earth's shape.  8)
Logged
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/ ✌
*

Danang

  • 5990
  • +27/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #217 on: October 02, 2018, 12:11:00 AM »
Even 0.06066 has hint at "Poland Flag" (if the hatch is colored red).
The 0.06066 area equals 0.2071 times 0.2929.

Phew is always Eyes Friendly :')
Logged
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/ ✌
*

Danang

  • 5990
  • +27/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #218 on: October 02, 2018, 12:20:27 AM »
Quote from: JackBlack on October 01, 2018, 09:45:24 PM
Quote from: Danang on October 01, 2018, 07:57:07 PM
*** Phew Wins ***
Case closed.  :')
6-2*sqrt(2)=3.1715728752538099023966225515806.

Nice try.
Phew is Eyes Friendly. ~
Logged
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/ ✌
*

Danang

  • 5990
  • +27/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #219 on: October 02, 2018, 12:22:39 AM »
Quote from: rabinoz on October 01, 2018, 10:17:25 PM
Quote from: Danang on October 01, 2018, 06:18:58 PM

"Sooo... Let me conclude this thread...

Pi has definite calculations, Pi has some made up calculations.

*** Pi Wins ***

Case closed.  :')
Too late, you already closed the case!

So, out if the kindness of my heart, I restored you ;) accidentally ;) deleted post deleted.

To make it perfect, kindness needs additional feature called: Phew. 8)
Logged
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/ ✌
*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #220 on: October 02, 2018, 12:39:05 AM »
Quote from: Danang on October 02, 2018, 12:00:54 AM
when will I close this Phew Winning Thread and celebrate it??
Perhaps when you act like a rational adult and admit you were wrong and that pi is correct; or when you do the impossible and actually show that pi is wrong and that your nonsense is correct.

Quote from: Danang on October 02, 2018, 12:00:54 AM
Pi is Wrong because it has failed measurements.
Only according to you.
According to everyone else, it works fine.


Quote from: Danang on October 02, 2018, 12:00:54 AM
Here is another example:
Too narrow I guess.
Yes, here is another example of your nonsense.
You don't like reality, so you reject it.
You have no rational justification for any of your claims, but you just stick to it.

There isn't even any indication of what you are talking about.

Now, can you point out a problem with any of the 60 points.
Logged
*

Danang

  • 5990
  • +27/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #221 on: October 02, 2018, 12:45:52 AM »
Quote from: Danang on October 02, 2018, 12:00:54 AM
Quote from: Themightykabool on October 01, 2018, 08:54:59 PM
In its basic format pi is a ratio constant between circumference and diameter.
How do you feel that all math has been wrong about one number divided by another?
Pi claim the hatching area equals 0.25859 of the non curved yard i.e. 0.1073. It's around a quarter.
Too narrow I guess.

Oops sorry it's actually 0.43077 of 0.064409.

But still the previous example on the diagonal length of 30° is OBVIOUS about pi failure in measurement.
Logged
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/ ✌
*

MicroBeta

  • 2490
  • +1/-0
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #222 on: October 02, 2018, 01:58:21 AM »
Quote from: Danang on October 01, 2018, 07:57:07 PM
Wow Rabinoz was happy over a TYPO.  :o

Here is the corrected post:

"Sooo... Let me conclude this thread...

Phew has definite calculations, Pi has some made up calculations.

*** Phew Wins ***

Case closed.  :')
BS.  You haven't once shown "pi has some made up calculations" so you can't say that.  If you take "measurements" where pi doesn't work they either you don't know how to use a ruler or you lying.  Which is it?

Mike
Logged
Since it costs 2.72¢ to produce a penny, putting in your 2¢ if really worth 5.44¢.
*

JackBlack

  • 26157
  • +51/-79
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #223 on: October 02, 2018, 03:52:42 AM »
Quote from: Danang on October 02, 2018, 12:45:52 AM
But still the previous example on the diagonal length of 30° is OBVIOUS about pi failure in measurement.
No, it is obvious about your failure. Especially considering you can't even remember that you used 15 degrees, and completely misdrew the lines.

Again, what you are saying is just like saying it should be 10 m longer. You have nothing to support you at all.
Reality doesn't give a damn what you think. It isn't going to make pi longer just because you want it to be.

Now can you point out a single error in the derivation I provided?
Logged
?

frenat

  • 3752
  • +0/-2
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #224 on: October 02, 2018, 04:56:28 AM »
Quote from: Danang on October 01, 2018, 07:57:07 PM
Wow Rabinoz was happy over a TYPO.  :o

Here is the corrected post:

"Sooo... Let me conclude this thread...

Phew has definite calculations, Pi has some made up calculations.

*** Phew Wins ***

Case closed.  :')
Danang still delusional and trolling.
Logged
*

Danang

  • 5990
  • +27/-16
  • Everything will be "Phew" in its time :')
Re: Tangent & C Relation: 3.14159 vs Phew's 3.17157
« Reply #225 on: October 02, 2018, 05:51:59 AM »
Logged
• South Pole Centered FE Map AKA Phew FE Map
• Downwards Universal Deceleration.

Phew's Silicon Valley: https://gwebanget.home.blog/ ✌
Pages: 1 ... 6 7 [8]   Go Up
« previous next »