No, they are parallel and are tilting away from each other at 1 degree. This is part of the reason why the term non-euclidean is used.
Interesting way to put it. I must ask, are you jumping from FoR's here on the Earth with explaining the perpendicular lines tilting 1 degree in respect to each other while being simultaneously parallel (meeting at the center of mass on a spherical Earth)?
Because either I am just being ignorant of non-euclidean geometry or there is something you are thinking that I am not following in understanding.
non-euclidean geometry is being mis-used by the flat earth community. they explain it as if it is something magical. two lines can be parallel to each other and at the same time they can intersect at one point somewhere.
to them...this opens a lot of new doors and opportunities. they can now still believe in a flat world but it looks round.
however, non-euclidean geometry is none of all that.
a great example to illustrate non-euclidean geometry is how we defined the surface of our round earth.
notice the longtitude lines how they are parallel to each other, yet they intersect each other at the North Pole and the South Pole.
Perfectly explainable and nothing magical. it only exists in your definition. It is something geometrical.
you cannot say that from a distance something looks different because of non-euclidean geometry.
round things appear round...flat things appear flat.
so...
They can be misinterpreted and not fake. Space is curved - the earth is flat. The earth could appear curved at great distances due to this spatial curvature.
this is crap...if the earth appears curved at great distances...you should be able to see every continent at once in a circle.
however, that is not what you are seeing.