A few points to consider....

  • 15 Replies
  • 2433 Views
*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • +0/-0
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
A few points to consider....
« on: August 06, 2016, 07:36:39 AM »
Hello all.
I’ll start for apologising for the length of this post.
While the forum states it is strictly moderated, I would still let to set a few ground rules if this post spawns multiple posts.
No ad hominem attacks, not only is  this type of attack a logical fallacy  it is also pointless and gets the discussion nowhere. So no name calling or claiming people to be shills or trolls. Lets keep it clean and well mannered.

I on occasion have had a look at this site as I am interested in what others believe, whether it be religious, political or in this case the form, or shape of the earth.
As far as we can tell the Earth was first thought to be spherical over 2500 years ago.
No one single person in any one nation could be said to have made this discovery as it was observed to be the case in many parts of the world from the middle east to India and China.

It is clear the the belief that the earth is indeed a sphere predates not only NASA but the discovery or the founding of the USA. I will endeavour not to use the ’N’ word again as it appears to provoke much hostility and it is not by a long chalk the only agency to have ‘launched’ vehicles or probes into earth orbit or space, currently around 80 nations have launched satellites  into space for a wide variety of uses.

Claiming that a conspiracy exits among all these nations would have to have some believable evidence for it to be taken seriously and be used as a valid argument to refute the spherical nature of planet Earth.

Even before we ventured into space astronomy and the study of the heavens has a long pedigree that again predates even the founding of the USA. The study of the motion of the planets is well understood and thanks to Newton, predictions can be made of planetary positions and alignments thanks to his mathematical discoveries. Anyone is free to observe and verify these calculations as all the information is freely available.

Some people on this site claim that satellites that orbit the Earth are a myth. This can very easily be disproved by going out to a dark sky area in your country on a clear moonless night and just looking up. A telescope of binoculars will help but even with the naked eye many satellites can be seen as there is over 35,000 of them whizzing along. The largest is the ISS and is travelling at around 27,000K/H meaning it makes around 15 orbits each day. Again this is free for everyone on the planet to see and witness. There is also China's Tiangong-1 space laboratory, which is a bit smaller. If you want to find the best times for your own location have a look here...http://www.heavens-above.com

Photographs taken in space by the Chinese are freely available and are nothing to do with the agency that shall not be named. They include photos taken of both the moon and the earth.
 http://www.planetary.org/multimedia/space-images/index.jsp?keywords=change-program

The flat earth theory calls for a small sun with a diameter or around 32miles as opposed to its actual measured size of 432,376 miles. There is a big problem with the flat earth sun and its rather paltry size and that is nuclear fusion and how this process works and takes place. Our sun is a main sequence star and is around 4.6bn years old fusing its hydrogen fuel to form helium in a process that is well known and understood. If the sun did indeed have a diameter of 32miles it could not support nuclear fusion and even if it did would not have had enough hydrogen fuel to enable it to have lived for 4.5bn years. For our sun to be 32 miles in diameter the world of physics and astronomy would have to be turned upside down. Flat earth believers would have to come up with a whole new robust physics and astronomy that could withstand scrutiny.

The world has thousands of universities and dos of these will have physics and astronomy departments. How many of these teach flat earth theory? My guess would be none. Why? Is it it because there is a global conspiracy that involves millions of people over hundreds of nations, or is it because the world is a sphere?

At the end of the day it matters not to our daily life if we inhabit a planet that is flat, round or square. We are all born, live our futile lives then we die. If truth matters to you at all consider what underpins our technological world…..it is the very same physics and science that points to and proves the world is spherical.

On a more personal note I have been around a few years and have travelled widely visiting both hemispheres  and all five continents including Antartica. I am fortunate enough to have gone on holiday to Antartica and have seen it as it really is. If you don't believe me then just save up and go…its that simple. There are no armed groups stopping people nor is there any ice wall other than the glaciers that cover that continent. All these beliefs that the flat earth community have that surround Antartica as so easy to disprove by anyone who has a desire to find out the truth.

Many people on this site go to great lengths trying to convince themselves and others by putting forward propositions that have no real credible mainstream peer reviewed science behind them. I am not trying to convince FE believers that they are mistaken as I think that is impossible, rather I would encourage them to really examine the evidence.
Thanks for reading
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #1 on: August 06, 2016, 05:08:09 PM »
I will be surprised if you actually get any kind of reasoned response from the people who frequent this forum. All of your points are well reasoned and written plainly and clearly, and they are backed by experiments even the poorest person could conduct.

The fact of the matter is, a belief in a flat earth is just that: a belief. This belief isn't backed up by any logical reasoning that I have encountered. These observations lead me to the conclusion that flat earth theory is nothing but religion. Blind faith guides these people, even though mainstream Christian faiths abandoned the Flat Earth idea centuries ago.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +2/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #2 on: August 06, 2016, 07:35:57 PM »
On a more personal note I have been around a few years and have travelled widely visiting both hemispheres  and all five continents including Antartica.

You need a better travel agent . . .


7 Continents height=353

*

markjo

  • Content Nazi
  • 45089
  • +87/-120
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #3 on: August 06, 2016, 07:40:41 PM »
On a more personal note I have been around a few years and have travelled widely visiting both hemispheres  and all five continents including Antartica.

You need a better travel agent . . .
Nah.  Europe and Asia are really one continent (Eurasia) and Australia doesn't exist, so he's fine.
Science is what happens when preconception meets verification.
Quote from: Robosteve
Besides, perhaps FET is a conspiracy too.
Quote from: bullhorn
It is just the way it is, you understanding it doesn't concern me.

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +2/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #4 on: August 06, 2016, 07:49:13 PM »
On a more personal note I have been around a few years and have travelled widely visiting both hemispheres  and all five continents including Antartica.

You need a better travel agent . . .
Nah.  Europe and Asia are really one continent (Eurasia) and Australia doesn't exist, so he's fine.


I always forget to ignore Australia.  ;)

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • +0/-0
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #5 on: August 07, 2016, 12:37:37 AM »
On a more personal note I have been around a few years and have travelled widely visiting both hemispheres  and all five continents including Antartica.

You need a better travel agent . . .

I was wondering if anyone would pull me up on that.....and they did rather! than debating the actual point of the post they went for the slip of the keys. I of course included the Americas as one, when it technically should have been 2. But its rather a irrelevent point, would you not agree? as what is being discussed is the nature of the planet we all live and die on, and how people in fear of their beliefs ignore the real facts of the matter.

7 Continents height=353
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • +0/-0
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #6 on: August 07, 2016, 12:40:53 AM »
So far the only reaction has been on the actual number of continents which of course is 7 and not the 5 plus 1 I implied.....and just for the record Australia of course exists, what a propostrus notion to think otherwise.
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #7 on: August 07, 2016, 12:58:34 AM »
So far the only reaction has been on the actual number of continents which of course is 7 and not the 5 plus 1 I implied.....and just for the record Australia of course exists, what a propostrus notion to think otherwise.
This is exactly the kind of discourse I expected

*

Bullwinkle

  • The Elder Ones
  • 21053
  • +2/-1
  • Standard Idiot
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #8 on: August 07, 2016, 09:00:57 AM »

I was wondering if anyone would pull me up on that.....and they did rather! than debating the actual point of the post they went for the slip of the keys.



It was the only interesting part of the novel.

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • +0/-0
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #9 on: August 08, 2016, 06:35:16 AM »
Wow its gone so quiet...where has everyone gone.....can only be one thing....alien abduction, just has to be the only credible answer.
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these

Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #10 on: August 08, 2016, 04:42:50 PM »
Wow its gone so quiet...where has everyone gone.....can only be one thing....alien abduction, just has to be the only credible answer.
flat earthers avoid intelligent cases.
I wonder how obnoxious I can make my signature?
Please give me ideas.

*

Son of Orospu

  • Jura's b*tch and proud of it!
  • 37800
  • +1/-0
  • I have artificial intelligence
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #11 on: August 08, 2016, 05:59:50 PM »
Actually, many people consider North and South America to be one content, bringing the total number of inhabited continents to 5.  This is the reason the olympics symbol has 5 interlocked rings. 

*

TheRealBillNye

  • 1224
  • +0/-0
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #12 on: August 08, 2016, 06:29:41 PM »
JROA: The moderator who actually derails threads. Unbelievable.

Do you have anything to say about the OP's other points? No? Didn't think so.

?

Theguru

  • 18
  • +0/-0
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #13 on: August 09, 2016, 04:49:37 AM »
How would you conduct an experiment to measure the curvature of a standing body of water, minimising errors and artefacts?
Surely this would give us the answer?


*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #14 on: August 09, 2016, 05:36:12 AM »
JROA: The moderator who actually derails threads. Unbelievable.

Do you have anything to say about the OP's other points? No? Didn't think so.
You have noticed jroa's task description of "Custodial Engineer", it other words janitor. I interpret that to mean that his job is to sweep out what the Flat Earth Society thinks is garbage. I guess by that they mean any arguments that are getting too close to a raw nerve.

*

Nightsky

  • 900
  • +0/-0
  • Know the implications of what you believe.
Re: A few points to consider....
« Reply #15 on: August 09, 2016, 06:18:44 AM »
How would you conduct an experiment to measure the curvature of a standing body of water, minimising errors and artefacts?
Surely this would give us the answer?

Answer for what?
You can call me Gwyneth
I said that
Oh for the love of- Logical formulation:
FET is wrong, unsupported by evidence, and most models are refuted on multiple fronts; those that aren't tend not to make enough predictions to be realistically falsifiable
Jane said these