Poll

Who brings FET into the most disrepute? (FET only please, Sorry roundies)

Intelligent Globe earth believers, arguing for proven science to prove a spherecal Earth.
1 (9.1%)
Government placed Shills, Who are trying to mislead the entire earth populous.
3 (27.3%)
Intelligent FET believers, who theorize how a flat model can work.
1 (9.1%)
Unintelligent FET promoters, who don't really know how to argue FE cause. (YouTube etc...)
3 (27.3%)
Other. Please detail below.
3 (27.3%)

Total Members Voted: 11

« previous next »
Pages: [1]   Go Down

Who brings FET into the most disrepute?

  • 14 Replies
  • 3732 Views
*

getrealzommb

  • 894
  • +0/-0
  • We do actually live on a ball: But who cares?
Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« on: January 20, 2016, 02:40:09 PM »
Roundies are free to discuss, but the poll is for FE believers only, thanks.

We roundies often get accused of being shills or liars, but what if you are being misled? 

In my case, I am here to argue the facts and only facts, I will do my damnedest to debunk FE fantasy, then you are left with the reality.  I support a round earth. I wont tolerate bullshit from ether side.

What if the shills are the ones you least expect? The ones who ignorantly post here and places like YouTube without consideration of the accepted theories? The ones who will argue, that black is in fact white, against simple observations? Are these not the people who bring FET into disrepute? You decide...

Vote and Discuss...
« Last Edit: January 20, 2016, 02:50:24 PM by getrealzommb »
Logged
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #1 on: January 20, 2016, 03:23:52 PM »
Did anyone voted yet?
Logged
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.
*

Humble_Scientist

  • 398
  • +0/-0
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #2 on: January 20, 2016, 03:30:35 PM »
Quote from: getrealzommb on January 20, 2016, 02:40:09 PM
Roundies are free to discuss, but the poll is for FE believers only, thanks.

We roundies often get accused of being shills or liars, but what if you are being misled? 

In my case, I am here to argue the facts and only facts, I will do my damnedest to debunk FE fantasy, then you are left with the reality.  I support a round earth. I wont tolerate bullshit from ether side.

What if the shills are the ones you least expect? The ones who ignorantly post here and places like YouTube without consideration of the accepted theories? The ones who will argue, that black is in fact white, against simple observations? Are these not the people who bring FET into disrepute? You decide...

Vote and Discuss...

"Intelligent Globe earth believers, arguing for proven science to prove a spherecal Earth."
 ;D

Yep. Intelligent they are, for sure.

"the entire earth populous."
I like how it sounds.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2016, 03:33:33 PM by Humble_Scientist »
Logged
"It is not necessary that hypotheses should be true, or even probable; it is sufficient that they lead to results of calculation which agree with calculation".
Copernicus
*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #3 on: January 20, 2016, 07:57:50 PM »
Quote from: Humble_Scientist on January 20, 2016, 03:30:35 PM
Yep. Intelligent they are, for sure.
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on January 20, 2016, 03:23:52 PM
Did anyone voted yet?
Yes, yes. The intelligence is strong with these people, for sure.
That aside, I'd say it's mostly D, though I answered E because I don't believe the FET is in a state of disrepute.
In fact, we've always been pretty lively and popular.
« Last Edit: January 20, 2016, 08:00:58 PM by th3rm0m3t3r0 »
Logged


Quote from: sceptimatic on October 16, 2013, 08:29:11 AM
I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #4 on: January 20, 2016, 08:24:06 PM »
Quote from: th3rm0m3t3r0 on January 20, 2016, 07:57:50 PM
Quote from: Humble_Scientist on January 20, 2016, 03:30:35 PM
Yep. Intelligent they are, for sure.
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on January 20, 2016, 03:23:52 PM
Did anyone voted yet?
Yes, yes. The intelligence is strong with these people, for sure.
That aside, I'd say it's mostly D, though I answered E because I don't believe the FET is in a state of disrepute.
In fact, we've always been pretty lively and popular.

I can't see the results without voting.
Logged
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.
*

JimmyTheCrab

  • 10340
  • +0/-5
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #5 on: January 21, 2016, 05:44:45 AM »
Government shills.     People like th3rm0m3t3r0 and jroa who just come here to make the whole thing look ridiculous.
Logged
Quote from: mikeman7918
a single photon can pass through two sluts

Quote from: Chicken Fried Clucker
if Donald Trump stuck his penis in me after trying on clothes I would have that date and time burned in my head.
*

MaNaeSWolf

  • 2623
  • +1/-3
  • Show me the evidence
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #6 on: January 21, 2016, 05:54:27 AM »
Voted other. Cant see the vote result unless I vote.
Logged
If you move fast enough, everything appears flat
*

th3rm0m3t3r0

  • At least 3 words, please.
  • 4696
  • +0/-0
  • It's SCIENCE!
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #7 on: January 21, 2016, 09:04:30 AM »
Quote from: JimmyTheCrab on January 21, 2016, 05:44:45 AM
Government shills.     People like th3rm0m3t3r0 and jroa who just come here to make the whole thing look ridiculous.
Well, you make RET look ridiculous when scientists have been developing it for hundreds or thousands of years.
Must be tough, being you.
Logged


Quote from: sceptimatic on October 16, 2013, 08:29:11 AM
I don't profess to be correct.
Quote from: sceptimatic
I am correct.
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #8 on: January 21, 2016, 09:24:29 AM »
Quote from: MaNaeSWolf on January 21, 2016, 05:54:27 AM
Voted other. Cant see the vote result unless I vote.

Did the same. Sorry OP.
Logged
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.
*

Gaia_Redonda

  • 652
  • +0/-0
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #9 on: January 21, 2016, 09:33:31 AM »
As I go for a Spherical Earth (the only model that satisfactorily explains all the observations) I will respect the OP and not vote.

But the failure of FE is in the absence of decent answers to the multitude of relevant questions and objections made by so many people.

Starting with the easiest task on a "Flat" Earth; a decent map.
Logged
I much prefer the sharpest criticism of a single intelligent man to the thoughtless approval of the masses - Johannes Kepler (1571-1630)
*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #10 on: January 25, 2016, 03:10:11 AM »
Quote from: Gaia_Redonda on January 21, 2016, 09:33:31 AM
As I go for a Spherical Earth (the only model that satisfactorily explains all the observations) I will respect the OP and not vote.

But the failure of FE is in the absence of decent answers to the multitude of relevant questions and objections made by so many people.

Starting with the easiest task on a "Flat" Earth; a decent map.
Sure, it's necessary for the FE to have a map, but is it possible for a FE map to fit the known dimensions of the earth? The easiest to check, and least questionable, are the equatorial circumference and distance from equator today north pole.
Logged
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #11 on: January 25, 2016, 05:30:10 AM »
You can see votes without voting, there is a button below the bottom right of the poll window which says "show results".
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #12 on: January 25, 2016, 09:02:16 AM »
Quote from: Master_Evar on January 25, 2016, 05:30:10 AM
You can see votes without voting, there is a button below the bottom right of the poll window which says "show results".

I tried but it won't let me.
Logged
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #13 on: January 25, 2016, 09:36:26 PM »
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on January 25, 2016, 09:02:16 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on January 25, 2016, 05:30:10 AM
You can see votes without voting, there is a button below the bottom right of the poll window which says "show results".

I tried but it won't let me.

Weird. It works for me.
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3736
  • +9/-8
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Who brings FET into the most disrepute?
« Reply #14 on: January 25, 2016, 09:39:21 PM »
Quote from: Master_Evar on January 25, 2016, 09:36:26 PM
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on January 25, 2016, 09:02:16 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on January 25, 2016, 05:30:10 AM
You can see votes without voting, there is a button below the bottom right of the poll window which says "show results".

I tried but it won't let me.

Weird. It works for me.

It didnt for me. Besides its too late, I already voted. Again my apologies to OP.
Logged
Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.

Trans rights are human rights.
Pages: [1]   Go Up
« previous next »