Total demolition of the failed attractive gravitational concept:http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1723400#msg1723400http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1724215#msg1724215The detection of subquarks:
http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1278981#msg1278981Chris Hill, theorist at Fermilab, indicated the view in “New Scientist” | 11 May 1996 | page 29 | “It would suggest that whatever lies inside the quarks is incredibly tightly bound, in a way that theory can’t yet accommodate.” Absolute proof of the existence of subquarks:
https://web.archive.org/web/20120128042636/http://www.scientificexploration.org/journal/jse_09_4_phillips.pdf (Dr. Stephen Phillips, UCLA, Cambridge)
See also:
http://www.esotericscience.org/article5a.htmhttp://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1401101#msg1401101 (subquarks, quarks, mesons, baryons)
This is true, remarkable, even for elements like francium and astatine, whose atomic weights must have been unknown to Besant and Leadbeater because science discovered them in, respectively, 1939 and 1940, about seven years after the deaths of the two Theosophists. How, if MPAs are not atoms, could they have anticipated in 1908 - five years before scientists suspected the existence of isotopes - the fact that an element such as neon could have more than one type of atom, an MPA, moreover, whose calculated number weight of 22.33 is consistent with their having detected with micro-psi the neon-22 nuclide before the physicist J. J. Thomson discovered it in 1913? One must turn to particle physics for answers.This paper has presented evidence (summarized in Table 3) of how facts of nuclear and particle physics are consistent with purported psychic descriptions of subatomic particles. It is because Besant and Leadbeater finished their ob-servations many years before pertinent scientific knowledge became available that their work cannot be rejected as fraudulent once this consistency is accepted. Nor can critics plausible interpret their observations as precognitive
visions of future ideas and discoveries of physics. If this had been the case, Besant and Leadbeater might reasonably have been expected to describe atoms according to the Rutherford-Bohr model.
The catastrophic Rutherford-Bohr-Chadwick planetary atom model:http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=61446.msg1604716#msg1604716WHAT IS BIOHOMOCHIRALITY?http://www.theflatearthsociety.org/forum/index.php?topic=30499.msg1488624#msg1488624Some molecules come in left– and right-handed forms that are mirror images of each other (i.e.: they are related like our left and right hands. Hence this property is called chirality, from the Greek word for hand. The two forms are called enantiomers (from the Greek word for opposite) or optical isomers, because they rotate plane-polarised light either to the right or to the left.). All biological proteins are composed of only left-handed amino acids. How this could have come about in a primordial soup has long been a puzzle to origin-of-life researchers, since both L (levo, left-handed) and D (dextro, right-handed) forms react indiscriminately.
Francis Crick, codiscoverer of the DNA structure, describes this strange characteristic of the molecules of living organisms:
It has been well known for many years that for any particular molecule only one hand occurs in nature. For example the amino acids one finds in proteins are always what are called the L or levo amino acids, and never the D or dextro amino acids. Only one of the two mirror possibilities occurs in proteins.
Linus Pauling, Nobel laureate in chemistry:
This is a very puzzling fact . . . . All the proteins that have been investigated, obtained from animals and from plants, from higher organisms and from very simple organisms bacteria, molds, even viruses are found to have been made of L-amino acids.
The origin of biohomochirality is to be found in the physics of the subquark:
Dr.T. Henry Moray:
Further I realized that the energy was not coming out of the earth, but instead was coming to the earth from some outside source. These electrical oscillations in the form of waves were not simple oscillations, but were surgings --- like the waves of the sea --- coming to the earth continually, more in the daytime than at night, but always coming in vibrations from the reservoir of colossal energy out there in space.
Living tissue (with the exception of some bacteria) contains only L-amino acids (laevorotatory-left handed); dead tissue only D-amino acids (dextrorotatory-right handed).
Terrestrial gravity is represented by the dextrorotatory strings of receptive subquarks; antigravity comes into play once we can activate the laevorotatory strings of emissive subquarks (by torsion, sound, applying high electrical tension (see the Biefeld-Brown effect)).
The detection of the Higgs boson in the 1950s by G. Hodson:
http://forum.tfes.org/index.php?topic=1948.msg45226#msg45226