CHEMTRAILS..... Fact or Fiction?

Sorry guys, there are shills commenting on this forum.  There are millions of people all over the world involved in this corruption against humanity at various levels, and you get shills galore as a result.  Timelapse videos of chemtrails and "chem halo" videos from the saturation of the sky are damning.  Learn about Freemasons and the Jesuit order, the world governments are controlled.  And the shills are the biggest losers in all of human history lol

It never ceases to amuse me that when the predictable crop of conspiracy nutters are called out as blatant liars and messengers of disinformation, they invariable call their critics "shills" or claim they're in the thrall of the world governments or the CIA or the New World Order or whatever.  And like most flat earthers, Reynaga doesn't even understand what the word "shill" means—maybe he's been taking the same drugs as sceptimatic?  It's actual meaning?   A shill is "person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty".   And I'm "praising" Reynaga?  Hardly LOL.  Quite the opposite in fact.  Whack jobs rate very poorly even in my book of cyberspace characters to avoid.

For an independent view of the allegations about "chemtrails" check out THIS site.

There are of course no such thing as "chemtrails" other than in the distorted imaginations of the conspiracy theorists.  None of them has ever had the purported chemical discharges analysed by a laboratory—which is proof in itself that they don't exist as alleged.  None of them has ever posted a video of the chemicals being loaded onto planes, or the empty containers being offloaded.  This despite the conspiracy theorists claiming this is happening all over the world.  No airline maintenance engineer has ever reported sighting anything like like happening, nor has any pilot, or any air traffic controller, or even any commercial airline passengers.

I can only suggest—again—that this John Reynaga be totally ignored. His comments are nothing more than the delusional ramblings of somebody totally out of touch with the real world, and very little—if any—understanding of the real world the rest of us inhabit.

There's a very revealing exposé of paranoid conspiracy theorists you can check out HERE.  And Reynaga ticks all the boxes they bring up LOL.

Quote from: johnreynaga on December 19, 2014, 03:35:09 PM

Sorry guys, there are shills commenting on this forum.  There are millions of people all over the world involved in this corruption against humanity at various levels, and you get shills galore as a result.  Timelapse videos of chemtrails and "chem halo" videos from the saturation of the sky are damning.  Learn about Freemasons and the Jesuit order, the world governments are controlled.  And the shills are the biggest losers in all of human history lol

It never ceases to amuse me that when the predictable crop of conspiracy nutters are called out as blatant liars and messengers of disinformation, they invariable call their critics "shills" or claim they're in the thrall of the world governments or the CIA or the New World Order or whatever.  And like most flat earthers, Reynaga doesn't even understand what the word "shill" means—maybe he's been taking the same drugs as sceptimatic?  It's actual meaning?   A shill is "person who publicizes or praises something or someone for reasons of self-interest, personal profit, or friendship or loyalty".   And I'm "praising" Reynaga?  Hardly LOL.  Quite the opposite in fact.  Whack jobs rate very poorly even in my book of cyberspace characters to avoid.

For an independent view of the allegations about "chemtrails" check out THIS site.

There are of course no such thing as "chemtrails" other than in the distorted imaginations of the conspiracy theorists.  None of them has ever had the purported chemical discharges analysed by a laboratory—which is proof in itself that they don't exist as alleged.  None of them has ever posted a video of the chemicals being loaded onto planes, or the empty containers being offloaded.  This despite the conspiracy theorists claiming this is happening all over the world.  No airline maintenance engineer has ever reported sighting anything like like happening, nor has any pilot, or any air traffic controller, or even any commercial airline passengers.

I can only suggest—again—that this John Reynaga be totally ignored. His comments are nothing more than the delusional ramblings of somebody totally out of touch with the real world, and very little—if any—understanding of the real world the rest of us inhabit.

There's a very revealing exposé of paranoid conspiracy theorists you can check out HERE.  And Reynaga ticks all the boxes they bring up LOL.

I kinda love the idea of a place where the 5 million people employed be the US goverment, 25,000 at NASA alone, the millions upon millions employed by the aeronautics companies, airports, pilots and the millions that live around, hang around and work around airports, have yet to provide one iota of concrete evidence of chemtrails.

It all has to come from pasty trailer dwellers that think the CIA is reading their brains and somehow a couple few people can run the world without any one of the tens of millions needed for running it in their names would find and provide damning evidence to the rest of the world.

You keep reaching for that rainbow Reynaga, maybe someday you'll get to live in the Matrix like I know  you so desperately hope.

Quote from: johnreynaga on December 19, 2014, 03:35:09 PM

Sorry guys, there are shills commenting on this forum.  There are millions of people all over the world involved in this corruption against humanity at various levels, and you get shills galore as a result.  Timelapse videos of chemtrails and "chem halo" videos from the saturation of the sky are damning.  Learn about Freemasons and the Jesuit order, the world governments are controlled.  And the shills are the biggest losers in all of human history lol

" class="bbc_link" target="_blank" rel="noopener noreferrer">

I dunno, I have a beautiful Australian woman, a good job and a beautiful house.

All on top of that phat shill money. While you are kinda greasy.

I'd say I'm winning.

Hehe, that's what you think.

Quote from: Lemmiwinks on December 19, 2014, 04:23:26 PM

I dunno, I have a beautiful Australian woman, a good job and a beautiful house.
All on top of that phat shill money. While you are kinda greasy.
I'd say I'm winning.

Hehe, that's what you think.

There's no "think" about it hoppy.  We're winning hands down.  The spherical earth model is the only viable model.  This is even more the obvious case, because despite asking the flat earthers innumerable times on these forums to post a model of their flat earth, they are unable to do so.  Not even one single flat earther will give it a go.

So... until, or if, the flat earthers ever post a working model of their proposed flat earth, the spherical earth model wins by default alone LOL.

C'mon flat earthers, surely one of you can post a diagram of your flat earth?

Quote from: hoppy on December 23, 2014, 08:33:28 PM

Quote from: Lemmiwinks on December 19, 2014, 04:23:26 PM

I dunno, I have a beautiful Australian woman, a good job and a beautiful house.
All on top of that phat shill money. While you are kinda greasy.
I'd say I'm winning.

Hehe, that's what you think.

There's no "think" about it hoppy.  We're winning hands down.  The spherical earth model is the only viable model.  This is even more the obvious case, because despite asking the flat earthers innumerable times on these forums to post a model of their flat earth, they are unable to do so.  Not even one single flat earther will give it a go.

So... until, or if, the flat earthers ever post a working model of their proposed flat earth, the spherical earth model wins by default alone LOL.

C'mon flat earthers, surely one of you can post a diagram of your flat earth?

Flat earthers have posted proof, diagrams, pictures, long conversations and other irrefutable proof of flatness. If you are unable to comprehend these matters, maybe a reading comprehension course would help. Perhaps you are too lazy to spend your time learning, if this is the case I doubt that we will be able to help you.

Quote from: ausGeoff on December 24, 2014, 07:48:52 AM

Quote from: hoppy on December 23, 2014, 08:33:28 PM

Quote from: Lemmiwinks on December 19, 2014, 04:23:26 PM

I dunno, I have a beautiful Australian woman, a good job and a beautiful house.
All on top of that phat shill money. While you are kinda greasy.
I'd say I'm winning.

Hehe, that's what you think.

There's no "think" about it hoppy.  We're winning hands down.  The spherical earth model is the only viable model.  This is even more the obvious case, because despite asking the flat earthers innumerable times on these forums to post a model of their flat earth, they are unable to do so.  Not even one single flat earther will give it a go.

So... until, or if, the flat earthers ever post a working model of their proposed flat earth, the spherical earth model wins by default alone LOL.

C'mon flat earthers, surely one of you can post a diagram of your flat earth?

Flat earthers have posted proof, diagrams, pictures, long conversations and other irrefutable proof of flatness. If you are unable to comprehend these matters, maybe a reading comprehension course would help. Perhaps you are too lazy to spend your time learning, if this is the case I doubt that we will be able to help you.

Diagrams, pictures, and long conversations prove nothing and the rest of your "proof" is based off of misunderstandings about the standard model.

Quote from: ausGeoff on December 24, 2014, 07:48:52 AM

Quote from: hoppy on December 23, 2014, 08:33:28 PM

Quote from: Lemmiwinks on December 19, 2014, 04:23:26 PM

I dunno, I have a beautiful Australian woman, a good job and a beautiful house.
All on top of that phat shill money. While you are kinda greasy.
I'd say I'm winning.

Hehe, that's what you think.

There's no "think" about it hoppy.  We're winning hands down.  The spherical earth model is the only viable model.  This is even more the obvious case, because despite asking the flat earthers innumerable times on these forums to post a model of their flat earth, they are unable to do so.  Not even one single flat earther will give it a go.

So... until, or if, the flat earthers ever post a working model of their proposed flat earth, the spherical earth model wins by default alone LOL.

C'mon flat earthers, surely one of you can post a diagram of your flat earth?

Flat earthers have posted proof, diagrams, pictures, long conversations and other irrefutable proof of flatness. If you are unable to comprehend these matters, maybe a reading comprehension course would help. Perhaps you are too lazy to spend your time learning, if this is the case I doubt that we will be able to help you.

And we have torn each of those items apart with completely impartial math. You deciding to ignore reality when it doesn't suit you doesn't equal you winning.

Besides, have you been with an Aussie woman? Trust me, it's winning. :p

Flat earthers have posted proof, diagrams, pictures, long conversations and other irrefutable proof of flatness. If you are unable to comprehend these matters, maybe a reading comprehension course would help. Perhaps you are too lazy to spend your time learning, if this is the case I doubt that we will be able to help you.

Can you please link me to posts wherein the flat earthers have provided their model(s) of their flat earth?

"Long conversations" do not constitute any proof whatsoever.  We could have a long conversation about the existence of ghosts or UFOs, but in and of itself, that conversation wouldn't prove the case for or against their existence.  Both parties need viable evidence.

And for your information, if you seriously think that—as a flat earther—you can "help" me to comprehend all this scientific stuff, then you're sadly delusional LOL.  Feeble put-downs don't help you further your argument either—they just reinforce my opinion that you're struggling to make a case for your flat earth.  And ad hominems are the last resort of the desperate.

Quote from: ausGeoff on December 24, 2014, 07:48:52 AM

Quote from: hoppy on December 23, 2014, 08:33:28 PM

Quote from: Lemmiwinks on December 19, 2014, 04:23:26 PM

I dunno, I have a beautiful Australian woman, a good job and a beautiful house.
All on top of that phat shill money. While you are kinda greasy.
I'd say I'm winning.

Hehe, that's what you think.

There's no "think" about it hoppy.  We're winning hands down.  The spherical earth model is the only viable model.  This is even more the obvious case, because despite asking the flat earthers innumerable times on these forums to post a model of their flat earth, they are unable to do so.  Not even one single flat earther will give it a go.

So... until, or if, the flat earthers ever post a working model of their proposed flat earth, the spherical earth model wins by default alone LOL.

C'mon flat earthers, surely one of you can post a diagram of your flat earth?

Flat earthers have posted proof, diagrams, pictures, long conversations and other irrefutable proof of flatness. If you are unable to comprehend these matters, maybe a reading comprehension course would help. Perhaps you are too lazy to spend your time learning, if this is the case I doubt that we will be able to help you.

Big claims from such a little lady.