I'm trying to understand what is here

Quote from: Starman on April 18, 2014, 04:12:40 AM

Quote from: jroa on April 18, 2014, 04:08:34 AM

He was a contractor.  They paid him to be an artist.  Why would he be associated with a mission?  Do you think they list the contractors they hire to repaint an office or rewire some lights?  Do you ever think?

Do you think he would have access to knowledge of how NASA works or it's policies and details of projects. He looks more like a liar for attention.

So, now your evidence is that he is a liar-liar-pants-on-fire?  Oh my God.  He told you in the interview, he was given small pieces of information while they were in the process of recruiting him after he had been a contractor for years, presumably to see how he would react.

my evidence of him not being a whistle blower is that he has his video labeled as COMEDY

He was a contractor.  They paid him to be an artist.  Why would he be associated with a mission?  Do you think they list the contractors they hire to repaint an office or rewire some lights?  Do you ever think?

He supposedly worked on the pictures, thus he would have been mentioned at least once, even if not on the mission directly, but at least ONE mention of him from NASA, however there are none.

If you're claiming him to have been contracted by NASA, why don't you bring along any evidence? Why doesn't he? Why doesn't he show us his contract?

Again, sorry to have burst your bubble

Quote from: jroa on April 18, 2014, 04:08:34 AM

He was a contractor.  They paid him to be an artist.  Why would he be associated with a mission?  Do you think they list the contractors they hire to repaint an office or rewire some lights?  Do you ever think?

He supposedly worked on the pictures, thus he would have been mentioned at least once, even if not on the mission directly, but at least ONE mention of him from NASA, however there are none.

If you're claiming him to have been contracted by NASA, why don't you bring along any evidence? Why doesn't he? Why doesn't he show us his contract?

Again, sorry to have burst your bubble

He supposedly, and unknowingly worked on pictures for NASA.  Why would they advertise that they had hired a contractor to doctor pictures up for them?  Do you really thing they are that dumb? 

Quote from: Donk3y on April 18, 2014, 05:49:59 AM

Quote from: jroa on April 18, 2014, 04:08:34 AM

He was a contractor.  They paid him to be an artist.  Why would he be associated with a mission?  Do you think they list the contractors they hire to repaint an office or rewire some lights?  Do you ever think?

He supposedly worked on the pictures, thus he would have been mentioned at least once, even if not on the mission directly, but at least ONE mention of him from NASA, however there are none.

If you're claiming him to have been contracted by NASA, why don't you bring along any evidence? Why doesn't he? Why doesn't he show us his contract?

Again, sorry to have burst your bubble

He supposedly, and unknowingly worked on pictures for NASA.  Why would they advertise that they had hired a contractor to doctor pictures up for them?  Do you really thing they are that dumb?

Uh, because it's written in the LAW?

Also, did he show his contract? I don't know if you've ever been hired anywhere, but when you make a contract, you make it in doubles and you keep one.

Again, sorry to have burst your bubble

So you are going to reject everything until you see papers?  What are you, Nazi Germany? 

So you are going to reject everything until you see papers?  What are you, Nazi Germany?

Ah, classic losing tactic.

Never goes out of style.

So you are going to reject everything until you see papers?  What are you, Nazi Germany?

Now you are going to extremes. This is just one guy with a small contract as you said then you jump to say he was a whistle-blower to talk about what? What information could he possible have to make your claim NASA is evil?

Jroa is trolling you all hard with this one...

Jroa is trolling you all hard with this one...

I bet the person really is jroa, or maybe scepti