I am proposing that it is the composition of the Earth that affects the amount of UA Force that permeates it. This is, in fact, the definition of a theory.
This is in no way whatsoever a theory. This is a hypothesis, which is the FIRST step of the scientific method. A theory is developed after empirical evidence supports your hypothesis through testing and observation. This is not, as it may seem, a debate in semantics, but instead a post to point out the main flaw in your arguments. Your arguments are guesses. A round Earth has been scientifically proven (thanks Magellan). You really have no idea how to support your theory. In this sense, the FE idea can be treated as religion, which is what humanity imagines in order to explain the unknown.
Instead to choose that there is a worldwide conspiracy that has no financial, political, or social benefit. The absolute core flaw of the of the RE conspiracy is that it makes no sense for REers to have such a conspiracy.