North?

Nothing about a spinning Earth or the Constellations in the FAQ.

...that the earth is flat.  and  1+1=1.  are BOTH logical proofs.

Nope.

And the earth is proven flat (so that your hyporthesis can be tested...) how?

Doesn't need to be.  I refuse to run around in circles with you.

Quote from: "RenaissanceMan"

...that the earth is flat.  and  1+1=1.  are BOTH logical proofs.

Nope.

Quote

And the earth is proven flat (so that your hyporthesis can be tested...) how?

Doesn't need to be.  I refuse to run around in circles with you.

That's because you cannot refute my argument.

More importantly, why can you not examine presented findings? Clearly, you don't believe the earth to be flat... But to totally ignore the scientific method... Tsk.

I expect that a lot of people aren't following my argument... I make minor linguistic errors but I assure you, my stance is sound. Just like you can't build a house on a swamp without fixing the swamp you can't base a hypothesis on a failed hypothesis.

I don't think it's the language barrier that stands between us.  It's you're mistaken belief that I am applying purely deductive principles.  I never claimed that I am!

'YOUR' mistaken beliefs... 'YOU'RE' is a contraction of 'You are' If you're going to use linguistics as a weapon be sure to do it right. I'm not nitpicking..... I make mistakes like that all the time... but I don't use linguistics as a weapon.

And... oh no! I'm under no delusion that your arguments are based on deduction at all... I'm still trying to figure out what your angle is.

I've ruled out religious nut and Flat Earth believer, and you're PROBABLY not being blackmailed into this...

Currently? I'm going with an over adherence to Descartes' philosophy.

'YOUR' mistaken beliefs... 'YOU'RE' is a contraction of 'You are' If you're going to use linguistics as a weapon be sure to do it right. I'm not nitpicking..... I make mistakes like that all the time... but I don't use linguistics as a weapon.

Thanks for correcting me.