Dinosaurs?

  • 105 Replies
  • 18217 Views
?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #90 on: July 02, 2011, 05:13:57 PM »
Dinosaurs and reptiles belong to the same class, but humans and dogs belong to the same class too. So continue your ranting, it's going nowhere. You haven't posted a shred of evidence and the person most highly backing you believes that KFC is part of some conspiracy.

?

A.R. Wallace

  • 253
  • +0/-0
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #91 on: July 02, 2011, 05:25:06 PM »
Colonel Sanders is in on it too?    Say it ain't so!

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #92 on: July 02, 2011, 05:28:38 PM »
Colonel Sanders is in on it too?    Say it ain't so!
No he's not, he's dead.

?

Verrine

  • 819
  • +0/-0
  • Friend of Dr Crustinator
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #93 on: July 02, 2011, 05:30:04 PM »
So continue your ranting, it's going nowhere. You haven't posted a shred of evidence and the person most highly backing you believes that KFC is part of some conspiracy.

Logical fallacy.

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #94 on: July 02, 2011, 05:36:57 PM »
So continue your ranting, it's going nowhere. You haven't posted a shred of evidence and the person most highly backing you believes that KFC is part of some conspiracy.

Logical fallacy.



I was merely stating that the person who has his back the most believes in a conspiracy that also has no backing.

?

Verrine

  • 819
  • +0/-0
  • Friend of Dr Crustinator
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #95 on: July 02, 2011, 05:45:29 PM »
Yes, and that's a logical fallacy.

?

Felix (R)

  • 313
  • +0/-0
  • Brotherhood of FES
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #96 on: July 02, 2011, 05:47:02 PM »
It most certainly does have backing.  The only problem is that you have never asked, but merely accused people of having no evidence.  If you would try a more appropriate approach you might solicit more answers.  As of now, no body with the answers you apperently seek are taking you seriously. 

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #97 on: July 02, 2011, 05:47:17 PM »
Why should he trust the person backing him if they cannot provide anything for their claims?

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #98 on: July 02, 2011, 05:49:40 PM »
It most certainly does have backing.  The only problem is that you have never asked, but merely accused people of having no evidence.  If you would try a more appropriate approach you might solicit more answers.  As of now, no body with the answers you apperently seek are taking you seriously.
Nobody with the answers is taking me seriously? Sad face. So, where is this backing you apperently(sic) have?

Oh Verrine! Are you going to get on his case for making a spelling error, or is that just reserved for certain people? Are others allowed to make mistakes as long as they agree with you?

?

Felix (R)

  • 313
  • +0/-0
  • Brotherhood of FES
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #99 on: July 02, 2011, 05:52:58 PM »
I certainly hope not, i communicate via cellular phone while in the midst of work assignments

?

Verrine

  • 819
  • +0/-0
  • Friend of Dr Crustinator
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #100 on: July 02, 2011, 05:56:26 PM »
Oh Verrine! Are you going to get on his case for making a spelling error, or is that just reserved for certain people?

No, I'm not. Unlike you, he doesn't insult people for no reason.

?

Felix (R)

  • 313
  • +0/-0
  • Brotherhood of FES
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #101 on: July 02, 2011, 05:58:00 PM »
Do not blame him for insults based on that sort of error.  Follow his post's back and you will find that he has merely reciprocated those who seem to be focused on such petty means of debate.

?

sillyrob

  • Official Member
  • 3771
  • +0/-0
  • Punk rawk.
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #102 on: July 02, 2011, 05:58:41 PM »
Oh Verrine! Are you going to get on his case for making a spelling error, or is that just reserved for certain people?

No, I'm not. Unlike you, he doesn't insult people for no reasondisagree with me.
Fixed it for you.

?

Felix (R)

  • 313
  • +0/-0
  • Brotherhood of FES
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #103 on: July 02, 2011, 06:04:14 PM »
Now now robby, you do tend to get excited and make fraudulent accusations and insult people and use excessivley profane remarks. ...and for what purpose.  Does this accomplish anything??

*

hoppy

  • Flat Earth Believer
  • 11852
  • +10/-5
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #104 on: July 05, 2011, 06:26:41 PM »
Now now robby, you do tend to get excited and make fraudulent accusations and insult people and use excessivley profane remarks. ...and for what purpose.  Does this accomplish anything??
He is nothing more than a disinfo agent for the conspiracy. Trying to stir contention in the search for truth.
God is real.                                         
http://www.scribd.com/doc/9665708/Flat-Earth-Bible-02-of-10-The-Flat-Earth

?

Felix (R)

  • 313
  • +0/-0
  • Brotherhood of FES
Re: Dinosaurs?
« Reply #105 on: July 05, 2011, 09:01:48 PM »
No, I wouldnt go that far with his likes.  He has been conviicted (not yet prosecuted) for employing an alt (boon) to aggresively shout out little bits of nothing.  The alt was banned of course.  A close  associate of mine caught on to the nonsense right away.(Verrine)