James' Moon Theory

  • 128 Replies
  • 27741 Views
?

Danukenator123

  • 518
  • +0/-0
  • My Alts: Parsifal
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #120 on: October 16, 2010, 07:15:38 PM »
I've also heard it proposed that life (microorganisms anyways) may live in the clouds that cover all of venus. Apparently they have a similar composition to the sulfur springs in Yellowstone National Park were organisms are known to live. Granted, they would have to really tiny or they would fall out of the clouds, but life is life I suppose.
Just how did someone determine that composition since you claim sustained space travel is impossible?

By emission spectroscopy. Every element has it's own unique range of light that it gives off. Because of this, if you know what wavelengths of light an object emits, like for example, the the clouds of Venus, you can understand what they are made of. This is really basic stuff.

Heres the unmodified quote.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #121 on: October 16, 2010, 10:30:15 PM »
Heres the unmodified quote.

I did not edit the content the posts. I only cut out the irrelevant parts. Do point out how quoting the entire post made any difference to what ClockTower was referring to. Here's a hint, it doesn't.

It doesn't matter how much you stamp your feet, and throw a tantrum, you are still incorrect. You just look like a child that keeps saying "Nu uh!" when they are told they are wrong. Now go to your room small child, and think about what you have done wrong.

Apparently they [the clouds] have a similar composition to the sulfur springs in Yellowstone National Park were organisms are known to live.
Just how did someone determine that composition since you claim sustained space travel is impossible?

Do point out where he asked about the organisms. He was quite clearly referring to the clouds.

It doesn't matter if you use the entire post, or a quote where the irrelevancies are cut out. This does not change.

« Last Edit: October 16, 2010, 10:32:17 PM by EnglshGentleman »

*

Pongo

  • 6752
  • +1/-0
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #122 on: October 17, 2010, 02:04:55 AM »
I've read both sides of this, and I have to say that EG is quite right.

*

EnglshGentleman

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 9533
  • +0/-0
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #123 on: October 17, 2010, 10:42:51 AM »
I've read both sides of this, and I have to say that EG is quite right.

Thank you.  :)

Alas, I have no clue why he keeps going on about this. He is quite clearly incorrect in his assertion.

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #124 on: October 18, 2010, 02:06:45 PM »
To be honest, until this thread I had never associated blood rain with the moon, though as Jim has connected the two it does seem interesting enough for further thought.
It was actually me who made the connection.  My current work in part deals with the weather system on the moon which brings these here.  I hope to travel to Guatemala soon to witness moon biomass first hand.

Apologies John. I just read this entire paper (http://arxiv.org/abs/1008.4960)  the other day, and was intrigued by the results.
"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

?

Hazbollah

  • Flat Earth Editor
  • 2436
  • +0/-0
  • Earth Shape Apathetic.
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #125 on: October 20, 2010, 01:47:00 AM »
Indeed, I even posted video evidence of Lunar life in this very thread.
Always check your tackle- Caerphilly school of Health. If I see an innuendo in my post, I'll be sure to whip it out.

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #126 on: October 27, 2010, 06:03:07 PM »
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8226075.stm

http://www.usatoday.com/tech/science/space/2009-09-14-moon-rock_N.htm

Consider yourself countered!
Seems like a fair amount of speculation to account for the facts.

However, a fair enough point and I'll put that aside for now. 

What about bloodrain and mana which have been shown to fall from the heavens?
Evidence against bloodrain falling from the heavens: Please reference: http://www.iangoddard.com/redrain.htm.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards

*

Ski

  • Planar Moderator
  • 8781
  • +1/-2
  • Homines, dum docent, dispenguin.
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #127 on: October 28, 2010, 04:44:10 PM »
Quote from:  Kumar, Louis 2006
Strangely, a test for DNA using Ethidium Bromide dye fluorescence technique indicates absence of DNA in these cells. In the context of a suspected link between a meteor airburst event and the red rain, the possibility for the extraterrestrial origin of these particles from cometary fragments is discussed...

The mysterious red rain phenomena occurred over different parts of Kerala, a State in India, starting from 25th July 2001. The news reports of this phenomenon appeared in various newspapers and other media (Nature, 2001)and are currently carried by several websites (Ramakrishnan, 2001; Radhakrishnan, 2001; Surendran, 2001; Solomon, 2001; Nair, 2001). In an unpublished report, Sampath et al. (2001) claimed that the red rain particles were possibly fungal spores from trees.

From a published study: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601022

"Never think you can turn over any old falsehood without a terrible squirming of the horrid little population that dwells under it." -O.W. Holmes "Truth forever on the scaffold, Wrong forever on the throne.."

*

ClockTower

  • 6455
  • +0/-0
Re: James' Moon Theory
« Reply #128 on: October 28, 2010, 07:41:31 PM »
Quote from:  Kumar, Louis 2006
Strangely, a test for DNA using Ethidium Bromide dye fluorescence technique indicates absence of DNA in these cells. In the context of a suspected link between a meteor airburst event and the red rain, the possibility for the extraterrestrial origin of these particles from cometary fragments is discussed...

The mysterious red rain phenomena occurred over different parts of Kerala, a State in India, starting from 25th July 2001. The news reports of this phenomenon appeared in various newspapers and other media (Nature, 2001)and are currently carried by several websites (Ramakrishnan, 2001; Radhakrishnan, 2001; Surendran, 2001; Solomon, 2001; Nair, 2001). In an unpublished report, Sampath et al. (2001) claimed that the red rain particles were possibly fungal spores from trees.

From a published study: http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0601022


Thanks for the additional support.
Keep it serious, Thork. You can troll, but don't be so open. We have standards