I have read the FAQ, and I have thought of something just recently. Have you ever flown to Japan? I have, and it didn't take that long (I live in California.) By your theories and logic, I would have to fly all the way to the other side of the planet to get there. If memory serves correctly, the only thing I flew over was water...no continents. Which means I flew going the other direction. So can you say to object this?
ok, so i, for the last 3 hours, have been looking through your forums and humoring myself with the debates. it got to a point where i had to make a user name because i was getting so fed up with this. but i came across this thread and i'd really really like someone to explain this question above. i'm open minded, but i'm just as closed minded as all of you. i have my own beliefs as do you and just as it's hard for you to see outside the box, it's hard for me to see what you believe. but i'm trying to see.
no more BS posts about spelling errors or people being fags or whatever. if i'd read over this explanation before, i must have misunderstood it. so please someone explain how someone can fly from California to japan in a VERY short time as opposed to (yes i read about the fake routes and stuff) flying around everything else... it's all water.
so by your theories, the person flying the plane went a different route because they would fall off the edge of the earth, correct? but did they fly SUPER fast to make all the passengers believe they went straight from cali to japan? if so... please explain the gas rationing of flying across the entire planet? i'm not trying to pick a fight, but he has a good point. i'd just like to understand how this should work?
and, seriously, if you say something silly like "the windows on the planes make you see water" or some other sci-fi stuff a 5th grader would write in a book report... ugh.
and watch as 2 or 3 (or more!) of you mock my last sentence and do it anyway for a laugh. but go ahead. i have a sense of humor. ^-^v