Relative Terms of Perception and Awareness - Everything is Relative

I guess as Einsteins theory of relativity proves, everything in the universe is indeed relative.
So in relative terms:

From the point of view of a Frog:
To a frog living in a well: The earth is shaped like a cylinder with water at one end and a mysterious light source at the other end.

Lets consider a Cow which has exposure to more than the Frog above:
To a cow: The earth is shaped like a bunch of hills and pastures with grass growing on them and an occasional barn here and there.

In conclusion:
Interpretation and perception of all things in the universe is relative to the level of intelligence of the perceiving agent.

There is no point in trying to explain to the Cow that there is more to the world than hills, pastures, grass and barns. If you don't believe me then try it, you will find it quite frustrating.

Similarly there is no point in trying to explain to the Frog that there is more to the world that the well which it lives in. It cannot see anything else so how could there be anything else?

But then again. Ignorance is bliss indeed.

So to rephrase my earlier statement:
Interpretation and perception of all things in the universe is relative to the level of intelligence versus the level of ignorance of the perceiving agent.

Note: Intelligence and Ignorance tends to be inversely proportional to each other.
However there is no law that states one attribute to be superior or inferior to the other. It is all relative ot ones own point of view.

To be intelligently aware of one point of view is to be blissfully ignorant of it's opposing point of view.

We all have a choice with respect to any argument or point of view:
1) To live in blissful ignorance
or
2) To live through the pain of awareness and intelligence.

Neither choice is necessarily better than the other - It is simply a choice.
Therefore what is the point in debating complex arguments without complete awareness of both sides of the issue.

To each his own I say.

And finally I propose a new theory:
The earth is neither round nor is it flat. Instead it is in the shape of a cylinder with light at one end and water at the other.

Yours Sincerely

Froggie Froo
CEO
The distinguished order of the frog in the well society

Can we talk about zombies with bazooka's instead?

Can we talk about zombies with bazooka's instead?

Umm. I'd rather not.
Zombies with bazookas just might have a brain
Frogs are way cooler cause they dont have one.

But you didn't say what yuo think of my theory:
The earth is neither round nor is it flat. Instead it is in the shape of a cylinder with light at one end and water at the other.

Also We strongly believe that you must have a tail. And since you Cant prove you dont without using a picture. You must have a tail.

YAY another victory for Cylinder with Light and Water Believers

(Can anyone help with a cool acronym for this theory)