« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

Anomalies in RE

  • 40 Replies
  • 7191 Views
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #30 on: November 23, 2007, 02:59:56 PM »
It implies that the earth will look flat.
It implies that the celestial poles will be very cold due to their distance from the sun.
It implies that the earth is accelerating upwards rather than being subject to an imaginary force.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

Ferruccio

  • 348
  • +0/-0
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #31 on: November 23, 2007, 03:23:11 PM »
That's not what I meant.  Read the post again :)
Logged
*

Roundy the Truthinessist

  • Flat Earth TheFLAMETHROWER!
  • The Elder Ones
  • 26966
  • +0/-0
  • I'm the boss.
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #32 on: November 23, 2007, 03:43:23 PM »
Well, I would call the fact that the earth looks flat "a strange anomaly in RE" that is explained with FE.

The experiments in Earth Not a Globe also qualify.  Parallax was able to see much further than the supposed curvature of the earth in RE would allow.  Another strange anomaly in RE explained by FE.
Logged
Quote from: wise on August 21, 2018, 11:47:45 PM
Where did you educate the biology, in toulet?
?

ItRestsOnInfiniteTurtles

  • 113
  • +0/-0
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #33 on: November 23, 2007, 04:39:59 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 23, 2007, 01:43:35 PM
Photons, gluons and bosons.

I can't see photons creating a shadow.  What about the other two?
Logged
The Earth rests on an Infinite stack of Turtles...
Stop raping the llamas!
I'm a platypus gynecologist, damn it!
"I once taught a rabbit to fly with only a string..." -Now
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #34 on: November 23, 2007, 04:41:19 PM »
Quote from: ItRestsOnInfiniteTurtles on November 23, 2007, 04:39:59 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 23, 2007, 01:43:35 PM
Photons, gluons and bosons.

I can't see photons creating a shadow.  What about the other two?
Uh, what?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

ItRestsOnInfiniteTurtles

  • 113
  • +0/-0
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #35 on: November 23, 2007, 05:00:12 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 23, 2007, 04:41:19 PM
Quote from: ItRestsOnInfiniteTurtles on November 23, 2007, 04:39:59 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 23, 2007, 01:43:35 PM
Photons, gluons and bosons.

I can't see photons creating a shadow.  What about the other two?
Uh, what?

I thought you were responding to the argument about this hypothetical massless shadowy object.  That was why the "massless" material was even brought up (at least that's how I read the thread, although I am sleep deprived these days).

So my question (which is entire academic) is, is it possible for gluons or bosons to get in the way of light and cast a shadow?

EDIT- some more thought- maybe with interference it is possible for photons to also "cast" shadows?  You know, like how we were able to prove the existence of a dense nucleus in atoms by shooting gold foil with charged particles?
« Last Edit: November 23, 2007, 05:03:51 PM by ItRestsOnInfiniteTurtles »
Logged
The Earth rests on an Infinite stack of Turtles...
Stop raping the llamas!
I'm a platypus gynecologist, damn it!
"I once taught a rabbit to fly with only a string..." -Now
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #36 on: November 23, 2007, 05:14:53 PM »
Quote from: eric bloedow on November 23, 2007, 01:16:33 PM
there's no such thing as a massless object; not in THIS universe!
That's what I was responding to.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

ItRestsOnInfiniteTurtles

  • 113
  • +0/-0
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #37 on: November 23, 2007, 05:31:21 PM »
gotcha. :-X
Logged
The Earth rests on an Infinite stack of Turtles...
Stop raping the llamas!
I'm a platypus gynecologist, damn it!
"I once taught a rabbit to fly with only a string..." -Now
?

Ferruccio

  • 348
  • +0/-0
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #38 on: November 23, 2007, 06:37:26 PM »
Quote from: Thus Spake Roundy on November 23, 2007, 03:43:23 PM
Well, I would call the fact that the earth looks flat "a strange anomaly in RE" that is explained with FE.

The experiments in Earth Not a Globe also qualify.  Parallax was able to see much further than the supposed curvature of the earth in RE would allow.  Another strange anomaly in RE explained by FE.

The experiments described in enag are very good ones.  I just think they should be conducted again with photos.  At this point, from the perspective of someone believing in RE, I find it hard to believe rowbotham is telling the truth about his results.

I want to know more about these reported daytime lunar eclipses, as, if they are indeed occurring, re would not have an explanation.

With regards to it looking flat out the window, this isn't exactly an anomaly that can't be elegantly explained by re.

I want some real anomalies that fe can explain a lot better than re.
Logged
?

eric bloedow

Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #39 on: November 23, 2007, 08:13:30 PM »
in an old thread, someone told of a simple experiment he did:
he went to a seashore, stood near a table, and looked at the horizon while holding his eyes just above the level of the table.

result? the horizon appeared very slightly curved relative to the edge of the table!

appearances can be deceiving...

he also said that if you took a large photograph of the horizon and held a straight-edge across it, you could see a difference. it's simply too slight to see with the naked eye, except at very high altitudes.
Logged
?

Ferruccio

  • 348
  • +0/-0
Re: Anomalies in RE
« Reply #40 on: November 23, 2007, 09:58:21 PM »
Quote from: eric bloedow on November 23, 2007, 08:13:30 PM
in an old thread, someone told of a simple experiment he did:
he went to a seashore, stood near a table, and looked at the horizon while holding his eyes just above the level of the table.

result? the horizon appeared very slightly curved relative to the edge of the table!

appearances can be deceiving...

he also said that if you took a large photograph of the horizon and held a straight-edge across it, you could see a difference. it's simply too slight to see with the naked eye, except at very high altitudes.

That's nice and all, but that's not what this thread us about.
Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »