Silver Dragon Tidal Bore - Proof of Moon’s Gravity

https://www.facebook.com/watch/?v=1524472502242218&vanity=chinaembmy&http_ref=eyJ0cyI6MTc3MjM2MjAyNTAwMCwiciI6Imh0dHBzOlwvXC93d3cuZ29vZ2xlLmNvbVwvIn0%3D

China's tidal bore on the Qiantang river draws eager spectators

The Qiantang River in Hangzhou province is known for having the world's largest tidal bore, which is called the Silver Dragon locally.
It's a natural phenomenon along a coast where a river empties into an ocean or sea and is essentially a strong tide that pushes up the river, against the current.

The tides usually reach their peak between the 15th and 18th day of the eighth lunar month with spectacular scenes to delight the crowds. Waves of up to nine metres can be generated, but this year they were only 0.3 metres high.

It's part of the Mid-Autumn Festival, an occasion when families get together, eat traditional mooncakes, light up lanterns and celebrate good harvests, according to state broadcaster CCTV.


https://www.euronews.com/video/2023/09/30/chinas-tidal-bore-on-the-qiantang-river-draws-eager-spectators

Spectacular tidal bore on Qiantang River amazes viewers



Funny RE and gravity have a working model why water doesn’t always find its own level.  Like how tidal bores go up river.  Where Flaties just act like they don’t exist.  Then rush to contradict themselves and poo poo something they can’t explain that destroys flat earth when it’s forced into their limited world view.   

Can you confirm, MarkDofTim, that this issue has not previously been addressed on Reddit or by ChatGPT and that the claim has not been refuted?

If you do not confirm this, I can assume that you know the claim is unfounded, in which case there will be no need for me to write a response.

I take your silence as an acknowledgment that you’re aware this nonsense can be easily refuted, that it has already been simply debunked on Reddit or other platforms, or that you accept it could be easily disproven by ChatGPT.

In that case, there’s no need for me to even consider this already-debunked BS claim of yours.

Otherwise, writing a rebuttal and dismantling it would take me no more than three minutes. But there’s no need to repeat myself. This is already nonsense, and by staying silent you’ve implicitly admitted it.

Next time, please come with a different fallacy you actually trust and that hasn’t already been debunked.

Good luck, DofmarkTim.

Can you confirm,

That it occurs as predicted to the moon and its gravity and not your BS that contradicts itself.

Nice try at false authority with your broken FE model. 

Lol

Good luck, DofmarkTim.

You still making fake accusations or don’t even know who you’re posting with.

You have serious issues. 

I take your silence

What silence.  FE makes false claims that water in the oceans finds its own level when it clearly doesn’t and contradicts the FE delusion.  Tidal bores are literally rivers reversing flow because of the moon’s gravity. 

ChatGPT

Really.  I thought that was a NWO tool made to spit out whatever one wanted by just asking the right question.












Oh wise, what would you have if you didn’t have your stupid pride and your false authority.  I guess reality. 

I haven’t said anything yet. I’m expecting you to claim that your argument is irrefutable — in other words, to stand behind it. Or you can simply say, “I’m afraid of the answer you’re going to give.” That’s how your attitude has come across so far, petroleum engineer.

I haven’t said anything yet.

You made claims about this and that and that.  Where you make claims about NWO or globalists or what not. 

Again…. You brought ChatGPT into this…

ChatGPT

Really.  I thought that was a NWO tool made to spit out whatever one wanted by just asking the right question.












Oh wise, what would you have if you didn’t have your stupid pride and your false authority.  I guess reality. 

I haven’t said anything yet.

—— VS——








Lol

Ok mister Pitsburg engineer,

Funny RE and gravity have a working model why water doesn’t always find its own level.

It’s hilarious how you, DataOverFlow, confuse a transient dynamic phenomenon with a static equilibrium. A tidal bore is not "water not finding its level"; it is a localized kinetic energy surge overcoming a shallow pressure gradient. For a "petroleum engineer," your inability to distinguish between Hydrostatics and Electrodynamic Fluid Flux is embarrassing.

Let’s dismantle your globalist fairy tale with the math you clearly avoid, Markjo:

1. The Failure of the Gravitational Model (The Wave Speed Myth)
Your globe model attributes tides to a "magic tug" from a rock 238,000 miles away. If that were true, the wave speed c in a channel would follow the shallow water equation:
where g is your theoretical gravity. However, in a tidal bore like the Qiantang, the Froude Number (Fr) exceeds 1, meaning the flow is supercritical:
This isn't "gravity" pulling water up; it is the Conservation of Momentum (P = m·v) in a narrowing funnel (Venturi Effect).

2. The Dielectric and Magnetic Interaction
What you call "gravity" is actually Universal Incoherent Dielectric Acceleration. The water in the Qiantang isn't just "water"; it’s a diamagnetic fluid interacting with the Moon’s electromagnetic induction on the Aether. The tidal bulge is governed by the Lorentz Force acting on the ionic content of the saltwater:
When the Moon (a high-frequency induction coil) passes over, it creates a dielectric displacement current (D):
This causes a localized density shift, not a change in the "level" of the Earth. The water is being pushed by a magnetic pressure gradient (B²/2μ₀), not pulled by a "ball."

3. Energy Flux and The Navier-Stokes Violation
If your globe existed, the tidal bore would have to account for the Coriolis Component (2ω × v) in a rotating frame. But in reality, the energy dissipation follows the Rayleigh-Taylor Instability within a fixed, non-rotating plane:
The Silver Dragon is a Soliton Wave, governed by the Korteweg–de Vries (KdV) Equation:
This equation describes waves on shallow water surfaces that maintain their shape. It has nothing to do with a spinning ball and everything to do with the boundary conditions of a flat, enclosed container (The Firmament).

4. Conclusion for the Pittsburgh "Engineer"
Water always finds its level in a state of rest. A wave is a disturbance in that level caused by external force—in this case, the electromagnetic interaction of the luminaries.

Datajo, a wave going up a river is no more "proof of a globe" than a person jumping is "proof of flight."

Spammark, your "Silver Dragon" is just a high-pressure ionic flux moving through a low-pressure channel.

DataOverFlow, if you can't calculate the Reynolds Number (Re = ρvL/μ) of the tidal bore without invoking "magical sky-tugs," you should hand in your engineering license.

Water is flat. The Earth is stationary. Your "gravity" is a mathematical bandage for a dying model. Markstimeup.

 it is a localized kinetic energy surge overcoming a shallow pressure gradient.

Nope.  Predictable result of the moons gravity in cycle with the heliocentric solar system vs your delusion and false authority.

Where FE water has to find its level.

So.  Again you have nothing but word salad and false authority with no means of actually creating an actual simulation. 

Predictable result of the moons gravity in cycle with the heliocentric solar system

"Predictable" only because you’ve been trained to ignore the actual mechanics of the phenomena, DataOverFlow. You say you have a "working model," yet you haven't provided a single calculation to show how a distant rock can overcome the density of 1000 kg/m³ water in a river against the river’s own outflow momentum.

Let’s help you with the engineering you clearly failed, Markjo:

1. The Momentum-Pressure Gradient Equivalence
The "kinetic energy surge" I mentioned is governed by the conservation of energy in a non-inertial dielectric medium. In a narrowing estuary, the velocity v increases as the cross-sectional area A decreases (Continuity Equation):
This increase in velocity creates a dynamic pressure surge that overcomes the static head h. The total energy per unit volume is constant according to the Bernoulli Principle for incompressible flow:
On a Flat Earth, the g in this equation is not "gravity," but the Incoherent Dielectric Acceleration toward the plane. A tidal bore is simply the transient state where ½ρv² (kinetic) dominates the potential energy of the river's flow.

2. The Lunar Induction and Dielectric Flux
You claim it's "gravity," DataisUp, but you cannot explain the Phase Lag or why tides occur 12 hours apart. The Moon is a lumninary acting as an inductive capacitor. The interaction between the Moon’s magnetic field B and the ion-rich saltwater follows the Magnetohydrodynamic (MHD) equations:
where J × B is the magnetic force pushing the water. The tidal cycle is a result of Harmonic Induction, not a "sky-tug." If it were gravity, the water would be "lighter" at high tide, yet its weight (mass × acceleration) remains constant. Explain that, TimeisData.

3. The Soliton Wave (KdV) Calculation
The "Silver Dragon" is a non-linear wave that doesn't dissipate. To simulate this, Spammark, you would need the Korteweg–de Vries parameters:
This describes how the wave maintains its level above the mean surface. You say FE has "no simulation," yet this formula describes the Flat Earth surface waves perfectly without needing a spinning ball. Your "ball" model fails to account for the Dispersion Relation in a shallow basin:

4. Conclusion for the "So-called" Engineer
Water is a physical substance, not a magical entity that follows your "heliocentric" fairy tales. You talk about "simulations" but you can't even solve a basic Reynolds Number for the bore:
If your "gravity" were real, the turbulence transition would be inconsistent with observed values.

Markdof, your constant "word salad" deflection is just a mask for your technical bankruptcy. You aren't an engineer; you are a technician of indoctrination.

It’s time to face reality, WilfulMan. You should hand back your engineering diploma—it’s clearly worthless—and replace it with a Voodoo Witch Doctor Certificate. Your belief in invisible sky-tugs and magical water-curving forces is more aligned with tribal mysticism than with actual physics.

Water remains flat at rest. The "bore" is dynamic flux. Your globe is a failed hypothesis. Marksoverup.

"Predictable"

That you use techno babble that is meaningless. 

Tidal bores still are events that cause rivers to flow backwards in connection with the moon and its gravity VS FE where water is supposed to flow to find its own level.

When in Maine, one can watch the lobster boasts struggle to get out to sea at the mouth of a river when the tide came in.  All in conjunction with the moon and its gravity.  FE is just a pointless hot mess of contradiction. 

4. Conclusion for the "So-called" Engineer.

Quite and cite where I ever claimed to be an engineer.

This increase in velocity creates a dynamic pressure surge that overcomes the static head h.

By what force.

“non-inertial dielectric medium” that you can’t even make a drop of water jump out of a cup. 

Quite and cite where I ever claimed to be an engineer.

Finally, an admission of truth! You aren't an engineer, DataOverFlow, because an engineer would understand that "techno babble" is actually the language of the physical world you fail to grasp. You’re just a script-reader for the globe cult, and your ignorance of basic mechanics is now on full display.

By what force.

By the force of Electrodynamic Induction, you clown. You claim it's "gravity," so let's use your own logic and watch it fail mathematically.

If your "magic sky-tug" was real, then during a high tide, the net acceleration a acting on the water should be reduced by the vector of the Moon’s gravitational pull. Where is the change in weight?
According to your BS model, water should be magically lighter at high tide. Yet, the hydrostatic pressure P at depth h remains exactly:
If g were being reduced by the Moon, the pressure at the sea floor would drop. It doesn't. You can't provide a single experiment where the Moon's "gravity" reduces the weight of a 1kg mass on a scale.

Tidal bores still are events that cause rivers to flow backwards in connection with the moon

Again, Datajo, you confuse a magnetic pressure gradient with a "pull." The Moon is a high-frequency induction source interacting with the saline (electrolyte) solution of the oceans. The resulting flow is governed by the Navier-Stokes equation for an incompressible fluid in a dielectric field:
The term J × B (Lorentz force) is what drives the tidal bulge. It's not "gravity"; it’s a plasma-dynamic interaction within the Aether.

“non-inertial dielectric medium” that you can’t even make a drop of water jump out of a cup.

Is that your best argument, TimeisData? "Make a drop jump"? Have you ever heard of Dielectrophoresis?
We can move water with electric fields in a lab every single day. Your "gravity," however, cannot be shielded, cannot be reflected, and cannot be demonstrated in any closed-system experiment. It is a magical placeholder for your ignorance.

lobster boats struggle to get out to sea... all in conjunction with the moon

Yes, Spammark, in conjunction with the Moon’s Electromagnetic Phase. The Moon moves, the magnetic field shifts, and the water—being a diamagnetic fluid—responds.
Water is repelled by magnetic fields. As the Moon (the inductive source) moves, it creates a displacement current in the Aether, pushing the water in a predictable cycle.

DataisUp, you are staring at a complex electromagnetic machine and calling it "magic gravity" because you can't solve a simple integral. Since you've admitted you aren't an engineer, please stop pretending you understand "working models."

Go back to your Voodoo altar and pray to your "Silver Dragon," Markstimeup. Real physics requires math, not lobster boat anecdotes.

vertical dielectric downward force.

One doesn’t break liquids from separating out by density with changing electrical fields, faraday cages, or grounding.  It’s done with free fall. As predicted by gravity. 


Gravity very real.  Wise BS useless.

Gravity very real. Wise BS useless.

You are not a physicist, you are a Dogmatic Echo. Sloganeering is the last refuge of a man who has run out of equations and logical transitions.

Invoking "free fall" as if it bypasses the Dielectric Acceleration Gradient only proves your categorical ignorance. In a dielectric system, density is the spatial sorting mechanism of the medium's pressure—free fall is simply the state of a body moving within that gradient without a counter-force. Calling it "Gravity" is a semantic pacifier for those who cannot grasp Field Theory.

You are a Broke Script-Reader waving a white flag disguised as a mantra. The math has buried you, and all you have left is a "trust me" sign.

Markstimeup.

Invoking "free fall" as if it bypasses the Dielectric Acceleration Gradient only proves your categorical ignorance.

Your delusion uses ever present electrical fields of earth.  One, objects should change weight as the earth’s electrical fields builds up to produce lighting.  Two, In free fall objects still have to cut the electrical fields so free fall should still cause liquids of different densities to separate out.  Yet free fall causes the force that causes different liquids of different densities to stop acting.  Free fall doesn’t stop objects from cutting across earth’s electrical fields. 


Three.  In free fall objects still have to cut the electrical fields so free fall should still cause liquids flow out of an open container that is punctured.

Free fall stops the flow as predicted by gravity.

https://youtube.com/shorts/vHothR8Im_Y?si=mC7smYtOgntxgjzv



Your useless and made up erroneous math is, well.  Useless.  Can’t even be used to size in horse power the motor needed for an elevator.

Free fall stops the flow as predicted by gravity... Your useless and made up erroneous math is, well. Useless.

Technician Markdof, you are a textbook example of a Subcontracted Thinker. You have no original data, no independent lab results, and zero conceptual depth. You are desperately trying to enter the bridal chamber with someone else's manhood, hiding behind YouTube shorts and GIFs because you are incapable of articulating a single physical principle on your own.

You are not a researcher; you are a Spam-Bot for the status quo, copy-pasting talking points you don't even understand.

In free fall objects still have to cut the electrical fields... free fall should still cause liquids of different densities to separate out.

Repairman Datajo, your ignorance of Relative Dielectric Permittivity and Frame of Reference is truly staggering. In "free fall," the object, the container, and the medium are moving in unison within the Dielectric Downward Vector. There is no relative acceleration (a[rel] = 0) between the components.


If there is no relative force, there is no separation. This doesn't prove "Gravity"; it proves that the dielectric field acts on the entire system uniformly. You think "cutting the field" should create a force, but you fail to realize that the field is the source of the acceleration in the first place.

Just because you don't understand how a field-gradient operates on a local frame, it doesn't magically turn your YouTube GIF into a scientific proof. Context matters.

Free fall stops the flow as predicted by gravity.

Nonsense. The flow stops because the pressure gradient (∇P) within the liquid becomes zero relative to the container.


When g[eff] = 0 (during free fall), the hydrostatic pressure disappears. This is basic Fluid Statics, not a miracle of your spinning ball. The fact that you think this is a "win" for gravity shows you don't even understand your own model's mechanics. It's just a label you paste over things you can't explain.

Your useless math... Can't even be used to size in horse power the motor needed for an elevator.

Actually, Mark, your "elevator motor" sizing is based on Empirical Load Tables written by people who actually understand torque and resistance. You just follow the chart like a trained monkey reading a script.

If you understood the Aetheric Displacement required to lift mass, you'd realize that "Horsepower" is just a unit of work against the dielectric field.


You are a Component Swapper who thinks the manual is the universe. The manual is just someone else's notes, not reality.

Stop riding the coat-tails of YouTube creators, Spam-Bot Mark. You have no experiments of your own, no understanding of the Second Law of Thermodynamics, and no explanation for why your "infinite vacuum" hasn't sucked the air out of your bottomless ball-earth yet.

Markstimeup. Go back to your toolbox and leave the field theory to the professionals.

 you are

Your contradiction destroys your delusions.

In your BS where weight is always consistent no mater the earth’s electrical field and water supposedly always seeks its own level.  You have no means to cause tidal bores and why rivers flow backwards in conjunction with the orbit of the moon.  Your false math proofs has nothing to do with the moon’s gravity perfectly explains tides in conjunction with the sun.  Where wise, you only can contradict yourself.  Sorry. 

You have no means to cause tidal bores and why rivers flow backwards... Your false math proofs has nothing to do with the moon’s gravity perfectly explains tides in conjunction with the sun.

Welcome to the debate, DataOverFlow. It seems you’ve arrived just in time to demonstrate the same level of technical illiteracy as your clone. You claim "gravity perfectly explains tides," yet you fail to account for the most basic law of gravitation: it is a 1/r² relationship.

F_g = G * (m1 * m2) / r²

If the Moon’s gravity were strong enough to lift trillions of tons of saltwater (the oceans), it would also be strong enough to strip the atmosphere off the Earth and pull every bird and airplane into space. Why does "gravity" only decide to grab the heavy, dense water and not the light, mobile gas of the atmosphere? Because your "gravitational tide" theory is a mathematical selection bias.

In reality, tides are an Electromagnetic Phenomenon caused by the Moon (a luminary node) passing through the Aetheric medium.

1. Dielectric Displacement: The Moon acts as a celestial inductor. As it rotates above the Earth (the ground), it creates a localized Dielectric Displacement Current in the conductive salt water.
D = ε₀ * E + P

2. Fluid Induction: The "tidal bore" is not a "pulling" of water; it is a Pressure Wave induced by the lunar electromagnetic flux affecting the density and buoyancy of the fluid.
∇P = J × B

This is why we have Amphidromic Points (places with no tides). If gravity were "pulling" the water in a global bulge, amphidromic points would be physically impossible. Gravity doesn't "miss" spots, but interfering electromagnetic waves do.

In your BS where weight is always consistent no mater the earth’s electrical field... You only can contradict yourself.

Contradiction? You don't even understand the variables I am using. Weight is consistent because the Vertical Potential Gradient (VPG) is constant at any given altitude (h).

E = -∇V

Weight is the result of Incoherent Dielectric Acceleration. The reason a river flows "backwards" during a tidal bore is due to the Vector Sum of the incoming electromagnetic pressure wave being greater than the hydrostatic pressure of the river’s current.

ΣF = F_wave - F_river

You call it "gravity" because you were taught to label everything you don't understand with that one magic word. I use Maxwell’s Equations and Fluid Dynamics.

water supposedly always seeks its own level.

"Supposedly"? This is an empirical fact, DataOverflow.
∇h = 0
If water did not seek its own level, the entire field of Civil Engineering and Hydraulics would collapse. The only reason you believe the ocean is "curved" is because you’ve been told it is. You have never, ever measured a curve on a standing body of water. You rely on "faith" in NASA, while I rely on the Theodolite.

You are just another technical parrot repeating 18th-century concepts to explain 21st-century observations. You talk about "tidal bores" but you couldn't solve a simple Bernoulli Equation to save your life.

P + 1/2ρv² + ρgh = constant

The Moon is a luminary node, not a rock with "pulling" powers. Go back to the basic physics lab, DataOverflow. You’re drowning in a sea of data you don't have the "equipment" to process.

It seems

Your delusion requires weight for an object to cycle if you think your delusion creates tides.  Your contradictions destroys your own delusions. 

Your delusion requires weight for an object to cycle if you think your delusion creates tides. Your contradictions destroys your own delusions.

Listen, you under-qualified shop-hand, who said there is no weight? I never said weight doesn't exist; I said your explanation for it is a 17th-century fairy tale. You’re like a toddler who thinks the TV works because of "magic" and gets angry when a technician starts explaining the circuit board.

Weight (W) in the real world is the result of Incoherent Dielectric Acceleration (g_d) acting on a mass within a medium.

W = m * g_d

In your "globe-cult" world, you need a magical "pull" from a non-existent core. In reality, an object's weight is its tendency to seek its position within the Earth's Vertical Potential Gradient.

E = -∇V

The oceans have massive weight. This weight is what creates the Hydrostatic Pressure in the fluid.

P = ρ * g_d * h

The tides occur because the Moon (an Electromagnetic Inductor) creates a localized field interference that affects the Dielectric Susceptibility (χ) of the water. This slightly alters the Net Force on the water, causing it to move and "bulge" locally.

F_total = (m * g_d) + (F_inductive)

It’s not "gravity" pulling the water; it’s Fluid Electrodynamics. If gravity were "pulling" the oceans, it would pull the Atmosphere (which is much lighter) a thousand times harder. Yet, your "gravity" magically leaves the air alone while lifting trillions of tons of water. Who’s the delusional one now, apprentice?

You keep shouting "contradiction" because your brain can't process a system that doesn't involve "balls spinning in a vacuum." You are so used to the Magical Pull theory that you can't see the Electromagnetic Reality staring you in the face.

1. Weight exists (it’s a Dielectric Vector).
2. Fluids respond to field changes (Induction).
3. The Earth is a Plane (nabla h = 0).

Go back to sweeping the floors, DataOverflow. You’re trying to lecture the Professor on "Weight" while you still haven't figured out why your "Gravity" doesn't work on a helium balloon. Magically, your "contradiction" just turned out to be your own lack of education.