The Ontological Unity: Why 1+2+3+...=1 in a Relational Universe

{1,2,3...} is what's known as a infinity series, or {1+2+3+...} = ∞

If ∞ = 1, then God exists.

For that to be true your little g god would have to be sin.  If you think god is infinitely everything as a whole.


Added.  So the universe is in spiritual terms divided into sin vs righteous.  The unclean vs the clean.  Or whatever.  But two divisions that are complete opposites and incompatible in trying to join to make a whole.  Would trying to combine a good and eatable half of an apple with a rotten and putrid apple half make a whole apple that would sustain a person? 
 

Really.  Then if you have something meaningful on how phases of the moon work and why the cycle is interrupted by lunar eclipses, post it.  Or you just have a delusion based of Eric.  And just regurgitate cult BS. 

Did you just make a math joke about sin(e)?

:fake_outrage:

 

Did you just make a math joke about sin(e)?

:fake_outrage:

 

No.  It’s a real thing that you are hard to like in anyway in the sense you are a proven pathological liar.

More on topic.

If you think this “If all divisions are relational illusions, then 1 ≡ ∞. The infinite sum 1+2+3+... collapses to 1 because the "parts" are just perspectives of the same ontological whole.”

Then address the rotten apple problem.

So the universe is in spiritual terms divided into sin vs righteousness.  The unclean vs the clean.  Or whatever.  But two divisions that are complete opposites and incompatible in trying to join to make a whole.  Would trying to combine a good and eatable half of an apple with a rotten and putrid apple half make a whole apple that would sustain a person?
 

As a reminder, this discussion started with your BS that 1+1=1.

Jack, your rage is a clear indicator of your intellectual ceiling. You are so trapped in the "counting on fingers" level of mathematics that you cannot grasp the Ontological Unity of Reality. You think 1+1 must equal 2 because you see two separate "parts," but you fail to realize that in a closed system, adding two things merely creates a New Unified Whole.

• The Axiom of Unity (1+1=1): If you take one cloud and add it to another cloud, you don't have "two clouds"; you have One Cloud. If you graft two living tissues together, they become One Organism. Your math is a tool for dividing; my logic is a tool for understanding Essence. Numbers are relational descriptors, not absolute truths. Logical Audit: Passed.
• The Totipotency Reality: You are still crying about "stems" vs "flesh"? Plant Totipotency proves that every single cell contains the blueprint for the whole. Whether it’s a stem, a leaf, or a piece of fruit tissue, the Information (The 1) is present in every "part." To say it only works with stems is like saying a book can only be read if you look at the spine. The essence is everywhere, Jack. Scientific Bankruptcy: Confirmed.

If that really was the case you wouldn't have responded. But you are desperate to get the last word...

• The Ramanujan Teaser: I respond not to "win" a word-war with a troll, but to leave markers for those who actually seek truth beyond your textbook dogmas. You can't even handle basic ontology—how are you going to handle the Ramanujan Summation where $1+2+3+4... = -1/12$? In your rigid, tiny world, that's "BS." In the world of higher physics and the Casimir Effect, it is a measured reality. Hardware Audit: Failed.

Actually, Jack, it’s quite simple: You hate the idea that $1 \equiv \infty$ because it removes the "separation" you need to feel superior. You want the universe to be a pile of loose bricks you can count. I am telling you the universe is a Single Infinite Brick, and your "counting" is just a way of describing the cracks you imagine.Go back to your calculator, Jack. The adults are discussing the nature of existence. Stay tuned for the Ramanujan study; it’s going to break your brain.