« previous next »
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Down

RE's, are you here for entertainment?

  • 39 Replies
  • 5873 Views
?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #30 on: January 18, 2007, 08:49:44 PM »
Quote from: "jiffy"
Which is denied as a personal unproved experience, unless the use of camera equipment is employed, in which case, they will say it's a fake.


Just as you would if we provided photographic evidence of FE. See how this works?
Logged
?

jiffy

  • 77
  • +0/-0
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #31 on: January 18, 2007, 08:54:04 PM »
Quote from: "Rick_James"
Quote from: "jiffy"
Absoloutly... stalemate. It's always a stalemate. Why? Because FE's refuse to accept absoloutly anything the supports commonly accepted modern science. In fact, just about anything that support the RE model, regardless of how logical.


This is double standards. You won't accept FE because of the "holes" in it, but are fine with these magical "gravitons"

No.
I am not trying to justify RE. As far as I'm concerned, RE has already been proven by those before me. Before us all.
If no-one questions RE, then there would be no need to even consider the topic. However, there are a small group, who have questioned RE theory. I am waiting to hear the proof of such. I am pointing out that the holes in FE theory nullifies any "proof" offered so far.
Logged
?

jiffy

  • 77
  • +0/-0
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #32 on: January 18, 2007, 08:55:36 PM »
Quote from: "Rick_James"
Quote from: "jiffy"
Which is denied as a personal unproved experience, unless the use of camera equipment is employed, in which case, they will say it's a fake.


Just as you would if we provided photographic evidence of FE. See how this works?

Can you please provide me with a picture of FE that at least looks like a photo, so I can evaluate it for myself? (so far, the only ones I have seen are quite visibly computer generated)
Logged
?

jiffy

  • 77
  • +0/-0
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #33 on: January 18, 2007, 09:47:30 PM »
anyone??
Logged
*

EvilToothpaste

  • 2461
  • +0/-0
  • The Reverse Engineer
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #34 on: January 18, 2007, 09:56:42 PM »
Quote from: "jiffy"
HAHAHA, true.
Well, there is actually. Just that the RE theory is accepted as proven fact by most of the population, and the FE theory is not.


Jiffy,

To me this forum is not so much about the Earth being flat or spherical.  It is about honestly looking at what's in front of your face and seeing if it agrees with what you think you know.  You don't have to believe anything, FE or RE, either way.  They are not trying to get you to believe anything.  

At the point we start believing in anything without knowing what we are believing is when bad things happen.  Like BOG said, think about WWII Germany and what they had to be thinking to kill all those people.  People have to think for themselves.   When most everyone blindly accepts anything I think it's time to start getting worried.  

Something can never be proven -- absolutely and with out all doubt -- as an unmovable, unalterable fact.  That's at least why I am here.

Drop everything that you think you know, and then see if you can prove it.
Logged
?

Tom Bishop

RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #35 on: January 18, 2007, 10:07:54 PM »
Jiffy,



This leaked image of the flat earth was taken by the Space Shuttle Endeavor from it's maiden flight on May 7th 1992, at an altitude of 195 nautical miles. It is an untouched photograph taken from a 35mm camera with a diagonal of 43 mm. It uses a normal lens of 50mm focal length. No zoom is applied.
Logged
?

jiffy

  • 77
  • +0/-0
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #36 on: January 18, 2007, 10:35:30 PM »
Thanks

First of all, I will not debate the realism of the picture, as that always ends up getting us no-where.

So, assuming the picture is real...

It is possible that with no edges on the picture, it could either be a large part of a FE or a small part of a RE.

Do you have any pictures that show all of FE including the ice wall and where it joins space? Eg. similar to what we have of the whole RE?
Logged
?

Tom Bishop

RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #37 on: January 18, 2007, 10:41:59 PM »
Do a little high school math and you will find that at an altitude of 195 nautical miles the RE horizon should have around 20 degrees of curvature in that picture.
Logged
?

jiffy

  • 77
  • +0/-0
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #38 on: January 18, 2007, 10:52:20 PM »
There was no need for an insult, I didn't use one.

For me to accept that the description you gave is correct. would require the person who took the picture to be truthful and of course, every person from there to be truthful. I am giving you the benefit of the doubt that the picture is real, but it would be a little much to ask if you expected me to take a description just typed down the bottom at face value.

The photo you provided, while it did look good, has very little in the way of actual detail. If a picture is supplied of RE, it generally has details such as outline of countries and such.

It's for this reason I asked for an additional photo, taken where more detail/distance can be seen.
Logged
?

jiffy

  • 77
  • +0/-0
RE's, are you here for entertainment?
« Reply #39 on: January 18, 2007, 11:02:26 PM »
Here's an example of the kinda thing I was thinking of (but obviously a flat one)

Logged
Pages: 1 [2]   Go Up
« previous next »