Why do

  • 16 Replies
  • 3747 Views
?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
Why do
« on: January 11, 2007, 03:06:53 PM »
Comets crash into the earth?

If everything is constantly accelerating at the same rate, why do these crash.,

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Why do
« Reply #1 on: January 11, 2007, 03:13:08 PM »
Well, they crash because we pass into their paths. Although its rare for earth to collide with a comet, it does get rained on by thousands of other tiny particles daily.

I still want to see evidence of the so called "Anti-Earth".

?

sodapop112

  • 264
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #2 on: January 11, 2007, 03:13:53 PM »
wouldn't it crash in to the ice wall sideways or somthing if it is going the same speed
he kinds of equations that they have now are the kinds of equations you would get in an approximation scheme to some underlying theory, but nobody knows what the underlying theory is.

discover magazine

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #3 on: January 11, 2007, 03:16:59 PM »
From what I can gather, in the FE model, all objects in space are being CONSTANTLY accelerated towards some sort of 'dark anti matter' or some other sciencey fiction stuff.

Therefore, we would not hit these objects.

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Why do
« Reply #4 on: January 11, 2007, 03:19:24 PM »
Ah but we do hit these things.

And if the earth supposedly has an "Anti-Earth" according to the FE model, why do the other bodies in space not seem to have one for them as well? Is the earth the only exception?

?

Alteru

  • 40
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #5 on: January 11, 2007, 03:21:47 PM »
He means meteors. Comets are orbital, meteoroids are not.


Explain why, if all objects in the universe are accelerating at the same rate, we can collide with meteorites?

?

Alteru

  • 40
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #6 on: January 11, 2007, 03:23:20 PM »
Quote from: "Hara Taiki"
Ah but we do hit these things.

And if the earth supposedly has an "Anti-Earth" according to the FE model, why do the other bodies in space not seem to have one for them as well? Is the earth the only exception?


Trust, me, Kadover is an RE. You are both agreeing right now. ;)

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Why do
« Reply #7 on: January 11, 2007, 03:25:18 PM »
Oh, I know, I was just helping to support what he was trying to say. ^_^

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #8 on: January 11, 2007, 03:26:31 PM »
Quote from: "Alteru"
He means meteors. Comets are orbital, meteoroids are not.


Explain why, if all objects in the universe are accelerating at 9.8 metres a second, that we collide with meteorites?


Yes, sorry for the confusion. Meteors I should have said.

And just for clarification, Alteru. According to FE, everything accelerates at 9.80 m/second squared. m/s is velocity. m/s^2 is acceleration.

?

Rick_James

  • The Elder Ones
  • 4311
  • +0/-0
  • Rick <3 Gayer
Why do
« Reply #9 on: January 11, 2007, 03:32:08 PM »
Quote from: "Kadover"
From what I can gather, in the FE model, all objects in space are being CONSTANTLY accelerated towards some sort of 'dark anti matter' or some other sciencey fiction stuff.

Therefore, we would not hit these objects.


Had you spent more than 5 minutes "gathering" you would have seen that not everybody believes in the "Everything accelerating together" model, and midguard (i believe) is the only one to have put forward the anti-earth theory.

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Why do
« Reply #10 on: January 11, 2007, 03:35:15 PM »
There is one fact that remains: FE's FAIL @ LIFE.

Seems to me like a bunch of FE's that tried to explain it to me used those notions, so yeah, I'd say it's a safe bet to put that notion forth.

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #11 on: January 11, 2007, 03:37:42 PM »
I didn't say anti earth, I said anti matter, entierely different ballpark.

None the less, it makes no difference *what* they are accelerating to, only that they are accelerating towards the same point.

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #12 on: January 11, 2007, 03:38:22 PM »
Oh and for the record, because I don't feel like wasting more of my time, the majority of my research comes from you guys ;)

?

Alteru

  • 40
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #13 on: January 11, 2007, 03:43:29 PM »
Quote from: "Kadover"
I didn't say anti earth, I said anti matter, entierely different ballpark.

None the less, it makes no difference *what* they are accelerating to, only that they are accelerating towards the same point.


In clarification, antimatter is a reality. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter

*

cmdshft

  • The Elder Ones
  • 13115
  • +0/-0
  • swiggity swooty
Why do
« Reply #14 on: January 11, 2007, 03:47:07 PM »
I knew it exists. I want to know where the supposed "Anit-Earth" and the other "Anti-Planets" are... and proof they exist.

*

Spacehopperjoe

  • 225
  • +0/-0
  • He dosnt sleep, he waits.
Why do
« Reply #15 on: January 11, 2007, 03:47:39 PM »
You shouldnt take midgard to seriously, unless hes talking about the ice wall. Hes been there you know
Read the FAQ first, it will save half of you looking like fools!

?

Kadover

  • 50
  • +0/-0
Why do
« Reply #16 on: January 11, 2007, 03:55:54 PM »
Sure he has ;)