Proof that GPS is a satellite based system

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: gpssjim on February 22, 2015, 08:46:03 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

And if you write the code yourself?  Just because you have no idea how to understand electronics and computer programs doesn't mean everyone else in the world is.  It is starting to become clear what your problem is.  You are assuming that the world is just as dumb as you are.  I know, it is sad that you will never learn how to operate your VCR.  But cheer up, it will be obsolete soon.  Google will launch a network of communications satellites to provide on demand services so you won't even need a VCR.  And lucky for you, they will sell you the service even though you will never understand how it works.  You have such an inferiority complex, you assume the cabal is so much smarter and more capable than you.

if you have nothing of meaning to add, say nothing.

I know, the meaning escapes you.  Let me put it this way.  If you are unable to understand programs, it does not mean no one can.  Just because your an idiot doesn't make the whole world an idiot.  I could write the code from scratch from first principles.  That is how science works.  Unlike FET which is a science of idiocy, you don't get to just make things up as you go.  That's why there is not a single line of code from FET.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

You have no actual clue, do you.  I compute the orbits myself.  The spoon-fed orbits are not good enough. 

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

i'm an idiot

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

You have no actual clue, do you.  I compute the orbits myself.  The spoon-fed orbits are not good enough.

think about what you're saying. do you just guess where the satellites are, or are you spoon-fed that?
and then you admit that the orbits nasa gives you are wrong. if they're not good enough for what you say is a simple purpose, why do you still accept them?

Quote from: inquisitive on February 22, 2015, 09:03:54 AM

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

It is a stark difference that RET demands some sort of evidence or explanation, isn't it!  The nerve we have to ask you for some sort of explanation, what bs!  Did you write that down as the answer to essay questions on your exams?  That would explain a lot.  RET can explain down to the smallest detail how GPS works, plate tectonics, seismic tomography, weather systems, etc.  and yet you can not even explain why when someone bumps their satellite dish they no longer get reception.

Quote from: gpssjim on February 22, 2015, 09:06:26 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

i'm an idiot

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

You have no actual clue, do you.  I compute the orbits myself.  The spoon-fed orbits are not good enough.

think about what you're saying. do you just guess where the satellites are, or are you spoon-fed that?
and then you admit that the orbits nasa gives you are wrong. if they're not good enough for what you say is a simple purpose, why do you still accept them?

Well, NASA orbits are not that bad, it is the DOD orbits that are not great.  NASA sells their orbits, they are the competition.  Mine are better though.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:09:37 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on February 22, 2015, 09:03:54 AM

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

It is a stark difference that RET demands some sort of evidence or explanation, isn't it!  The nerve we have to ask you for some sort of explanation, what bs!  Did you write that down as the answer to essay questions on your exams?  That would explain a lot.  RET can explain down to the smallest detail how GPS works, plate tectonics, seismic tomography, weather systems, etc.  and yet you can not even explain why when someone bumps their satellite dish they no longer get reception.

fiction isn't explanation. think for yourself. scientists are paid to give answers, they go where the money goes. don't believe what you're spoon-fed.
look at that, you're losing so you try and change the subject. cute.

and look, you think you're better than nasa. you can calculate what they apparently control and sent up there better than they can and better than they say. perhaps the information is wrong after all?
don't you see how it works? there more you learn, the more holes you see in what you've been spoon fed, the clearer it is that the earth is flat.

Quote from: inquisitive on February 22, 2015, 09:03:54 AM

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

All in www.gps.gov

Your use of language shows your credibility.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:09:37 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on February 22, 2015, 09:03:54 AM

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

All in

Your use of language shows your credibility.

credulity, not credibility.
not even nasa pretends the codes for gps were written by one person who has other demands on their time while having no real information with which to draw from. what are you smoking?

stop repeating yourself. that site has already been thoroughly refuted. scroll up, look back, i'm tired of you.

Quote from: gpssjim on February 22, 2015, 09:17:45 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:09:37 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on February 22, 2015, 09:03:54 AM

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

It is a stark difference that RET demands some sort of evidence or explanation, isn't it!  The nerve we have to ask you for some sort of explanation, what bs!  Did you write that down as the answer to essay questions on your exams?  That would explain a lot.  RET can explain down to the smallest detail how GPS works, plate tectonics, seismic tomography, weather systems, etc.  and yet you can not even explain why when someone bumps their satellite dish they no longer get reception.

fiction isn't explanation. think for yourself. scientists are paid to give answers, they go where the money goes. don't believe what you're spoon-fed.
look at that, you're losing so you try and change the subject. cute.

and look, you think you're better than nasa. you can calculate what they apparently control and sent up there better than they can and better than they say. perhaps the information is wrong after all?
don't you see how it works? there more you learn, the more holes you see in what you've been spoon fed, the clearer it is that the earth is flat.

GPS is not a NASA system, Navstar (the US system) is DOD,  Glonass Russian, Beidou Chinese, QZSS Japanese.  Just because the orbits can be improved does not make the earth flat, far from it, it means the earth is a spheroid, and the more RET concepts you introduce to the modeling of the orbit the better the orbits get.   

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:22:07 AM

Quote from: gpssjim on February 22, 2015, 09:17:45 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:09:37 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on February 22, 2015, 09:03:54 AM

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

It is a stark difference that RET demands some sort of evidence or explanation, isn't it!  The nerve we have to ask you for some sort of explanation, what bs!  Did you write that down as the answer to essay questions on your exams?  That would explain a lot.  RET can explain down to the smallest detail how GPS works, plate tectonics, seismic tomography, weather systems, etc.  and yet you can not even explain why when someone bumps their satellite dish they no longer get reception.

fiction isn't explanation. think for yourself. scientists are paid to give answers, they go where the money goes. don't believe what you're spoon-fed.
look at that, you're losing so you try and change the subject. cute.

and look, you think you're better than nasa. you can calculate what they apparently control and sent up there better than they can and better than they say. perhaps the information is wrong after all?
don't you see how it works? there more you learn, the more holes you see in what you've been spoon fed, the clearer it is that the earth is flat.

GPS is not a NASA system, Navstar (the US system) is DOD,  Glonass Russian, Beidou Chinese, QZSS Japanese.  Just because the orbits can be improved does not make the earth flat, far from it, it means the earth is a spheroid, and the more RET concepts you introduce to the modeling of the orbit the better the orbits get.

you keep telling yourself that.

Quote from: gpssjim on February 22, 2015, 09:29:15 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:22:07 AM

Quote from: gpssjim on February 22, 2015, 09:17:45 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:09:37 AM

Quote from: inquisitive on February 22, 2015, 09:03:54 AM

Your detailed explanation and evidence of how GPS works please, including NMEA codes.

answered before. learn to read. how is the fact i don't have the time to write pages and pages of technical stuff and that nasa and gps companies keep information secret in any way meant to be a flaw with me?
think about your demands before you make them. you're being an idiot and everyone can see it.

a total explanation of every way your earth came into existence, fully explaining the strong and weak nuclear forces, and gravity, please.
or can't you do that? maybe not knowing every fucking scrap isn't needed to be sure a state of affairs is true. maybe time constraints exist.

god, what the fuck is wrong with you people that you persist in such obvious bs demands with such self-righteousness that you think you're owed the world?!

think for once in your life.

It is a stark difference that RET demands some sort of evidence or explanation, isn't it!  The nerve we have to ask you for some sort of explanation, what bs!  Did you write that down as the answer to essay questions on your exams?  That would explain a lot.  RET can explain down to the smallest detail how GPS works, plate tectonics, seismic tomography, weather systems, etc.  and yet you can not even explain why when someone bumps their satellite dish they no longer get reception.

fiction isn't explanation. think for yourself. scientists are paid to give answers, they go where the money goes. don't believe what you're spoon-fed.
look at that, you're losing so you try and change the subject. cute.

and look, you think you're better than nasa. you can calculate what they apparently control and sent up there better than they can and better than they say. perhaps the information is wrong after all?
don't you see how it works? there more you learn, the more holes you see in what you've been spoon fed, the clearer it is that the earth is flat.

GPS is not a NASA system, Navstar (the US system) is DOD,  Glonass Russian, Beidou Chinese, QZSS Japanese.  Just because the orbits can be improved does not make the earth flat, far from it, it means the earth is a spheroid, and the more RET concepts you introduce to the modeling of the orbit the better the orbits get.

you keep telling yourself that.

You seem afraid.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

I bit on this. What code were you working in, and what was the purpose of the programming you were conducting? How long ago did you do this programming? Was their a completed piece of software, webpage, anything along those lines? Also, since you are have experience coding, what is the fastest was to view the source of any webpage on chrome?

Google long and hard on this answer, buddy boy.

JRoweSkeptic, watch your language in the upper fora.  We do not tolerate obscenity here.  Consider this a warning. 

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

This is not a full program, it's an API, and I've decompiled quite a few programs, and understood the code thanks to these helpful comments all over it. And programming is decently easy to pick up, why do you think it's incredibly hard? I have been programming in multiple languages for over 3 years now.

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

This is not a full program, it's an API, and I've decompiled quite a few programs, and understood the code thanks to these helpful comments all over it. And programming is decently easy to pick up, why do you think it's incredibly hard? I have been programming in multiple languages for over 3 years now.

Comments do not show up when you decompile.  You need the source code for that.  So, I can only assume that either you are lying and are simply trying to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are, or, you are simply inept with programming and did not know that.  Either way, you are not making yourself sound very reputable, now are you? 

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:08:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

This is not a full program, it's an API, and I've decompiled quite a few programs, and understood the code thanks to these helpful comments all over it. And programming is decently easy to pick up, why do you think it's incredibly hard? I have been programming in multiple languages for over 3 years now.

Comments do not show up when you decompile.  You need the source code for that.  So, I can only assume that either you are lying and are simply trying to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are, or, you are simply inept with programming and did not know that.  Either way, you are not making yourself sound very reputable, now are you?

I do have the source code. I'm simply saying that I've decompiled programs and understood them. The comment thing was a separate thought.

Quote from: jroa on February 22, 2015, 11:42:17 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:08:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

This is not a full program, it's an API, and I've decompiled quite a few programs, and understood the code thanks to these helpful comments all over it. And programming is decently easy to pick up, why do you think it's incredibly hard? I have been programming in multiple languages for over 3 years now.

Comments do not show up when you decompile.  You need the source code for that.  So, I can only assume that either you are lying and are simply trying to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are, or, you are simply inept with programming and did not know that.  Either way, you are not making yourself sound very reputable, now are you?

I do have the source code. I'm simply saying that I've decompiled programs and understood them. The comment thing was a separate thought.

It must be nice to be able to back out of getting outed by simply saying that you did not mean what you said.  I wonder if it would work in a court of law? 

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:45:14 AM

Quote from: jroa on February 22, 2015, 11:42:17 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:08:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

This is not a full program, it's an API, and I've decompiled quite a few programs, and understood the code thanks to these helpful comments all over it. And programming is decently easy to pick up, why do you think it's incredibly hard? I have been programming in multiple languages for over 3 years now.

Comments do not show up when you decompile.  You need the source code for that.  So, I can only assume that either you are lying and are simply trying to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are, or, you are simply inept with programming and did not know that.  Either way, you are not making yourself sound very reputable, now are you?

I do have the source code. I'm simply saying that I've decompiled programs and understood them. The comment thing was a separate thought.

It must be nice to be able to back out of getting outed by simply saying that you did not mean what you said.  I wonder if it would work in a court of law?

Ah. So my typing style has something to do with what my knowledge of programming is? We're derailing this thread. But honestly after I've looked through it it does not help this argument.

Quote from: jroa on February 22, 2015, 11:47:19 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:45:14 AM

Quote from: jroa on February 22, 2015, 11:42:17 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:08:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

This is not a full program, it's an API, and I've decompiled quite a few programs, and understood the code thanks to these helpful comments all over it. And programming is decently easy to pick up, why do you think it's incredibly hard? I have been programming in multiple languages for over 3 years now.

Comments do not show up when you decompile.  You need the source code for that.  So, I can only assume that either you are lying and are simply trying to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are, or, you are simply inept with programming and did not know that.  Either way, you are not making yourself sound very reputable, now are you?

I do have the source code. I'm simply saying that I've decompiled programs and understood them. The comment thing was a separate thought.

It must be nice to be able to back out of getting outed by simply saying that you did not mean what you said.  I wonder if it would work in a court of law?

Ah. So my typing style has something to do with what my knowledge of programming is? We're derailing this thread. But honestly after I've looked through it it does not help this argument.

I hope you can code more logically than you can write, in that case.  But, you are right, we are getting off track here.  Now, please, describe what exactly your point is that you were trying to make. 

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

I bit on this. What code were you working in, and what was the purpose of the programming you were conducting? How long ago did you do this programming? Was their a completed piece of software, webpage, anything along those lines? Also, since you are have experience coding, what is the fastest was to view the source of any webpage on chrome?

Google long and hard on this answer, buddy boy.

I've worked on many coding projects in many languages since the mid 80s, and I'm still programming.  Mostly on GPS Processing software, but also some side projects on signal analysis of seismic signals, firmware for a water vapor radiometer and such.  FORTRAN, C, C++, perl, php, bash, or what ever suits me.  CMD U to view source with firefox.  Maybe it is the same with chrome. 

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:58:33 AM

Quote from: jroa on February 22, 2015, 11:47:19 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:45:14 AM

Quote from: jroa on February 22, 2015, 11:42:17 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 11:08:18 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 09:01:21 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:55:31 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:54:28 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 22, 2015, 08:47:49 AM

Quote from: JRoweSkeptic on February 22, 2015, 08:34:03 AM

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So they're in on a conspiracy? Wow. An open source project that anyone can view, run, disassemble, mod, inspect. Anything I want with that code.

like you could read it. you can't even read the posts you reply to. it is easy to hide things in plain sight when people like you are going to arrogantly assume you're right and, when faced with conflicting evidence, shrug and decide there must be an explanation that satisfies your cowardly, gullible brain no matter what.

There are about 12 source files in there. Not much to look over.

in perfect english, i'm sure.
unlike you i have actually done some programming. it's common knowledge it's nearly impossible to understand another writer's codes. you say satellites are meant to be complicated, too. if you imagine you understand every line of every file you have dismissed logic. which is about what i expect from you.

to jim, you have not responded to a word i have said. you have blindly asserted in the face of evidence which contradicts every bs statement from you. if this is how you think, its no wonder you can't see the truth. you cannot make the code from scratch because to do that you will need the locations of the non-existent satellites which are spoon-fed to you and you naively assume are accurate.
you are wrong. learn from it rather than live in the same obvious bs.

This is not a full program, it's an API, and I've decompiled quite a few programs, and understood the code thanks to these helpful comments all over it. And programming is decently easy to pick up, why do you think it's incredibly hard? I have been programming in multiple languages for over 3 years now.

Comments do not show up when you decompile.  You need the source code for that.  So, I can only assume that either you are lying and are simply trying to make yourself sound more knowledgeable than you are, or, you are simply inept with programming and did not know that.  Either way, you are not making yourself sound very reputable, now are you?

I do have the source code. I'm simply saying that I've decompiled programs and understood them. The comment thing was a separate thought.

It must be nice to be able to back out of getting outed by simply saying that you did not mean what you said.  I wonder if it would work in a court of law?

Ah. So my typing style has something to do with what my knowledge of programming is? We're derailing this thread. But honestly after I've looked through it it does not help this argument.

I hope you can code more logically than you can write, in that case.  But, you are right, we are getting off track here.  Now, please, describe what exactly your point is that you were trying to make.

The point here is that I only now got a chance to look at the code, and it does not help this argument either way.

Hello, Instead of posting a new thread, I'll just start here

I work in an industry that requires monitoring cellphone GPS.

The FE argument is that there are enough radio towers to provide accurate triangulation everywhere on the land and ocean.

While there are enough Cellphone towers to provide service to most of the US, there are still cell phone dead zones where GPS still works. Go on a boat outside of 12 NM and see what your service is like, go into the mountains...  Please also research E911... There are limitations of radio (cell) towers that satellite GPS do not offer. (Think my sirius satellite radio, or Direct TV)   

Instead of putting all my points here, I'll let someone address this first, and then i'll respond with more nuggets of knowledge to further my point that Satellites exist.


As the InFlatEarth would say... FLAT EARTH BUSTED!!! haha

Quote from: Misero on February 21, 2015, 06:03:51 PM

So FE'rs, what will I find in the code? Will it be a simulation or what is says it is? Flat Earth Notion is all on the back of me finding a simulation in that code

it will be a lie. you don't understand how machines work, do you? you pick up the weather balloons, you think they're satellites, and it reacts according to the fakery. if you really think that they couldn't conceal the truth in layers of code, you're an idiot. code is code. subtleties exist, and no one seriously looks for it. if you find anything you're going to shrug it off and assume They know what they're doing even when you've been proven wrong.

So write your own code?