« previous next »
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Down

Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.

  • 86 Replies
  • 14559 Views
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3735
  • +9/-7
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #60 on: November 25, 2015, 06:19:44 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 06:06:41 PM
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on November 25, 2015, 05:45:46 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 12:03:56 AM
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on November 24, 2015, 08:38:56 PM
Where have you proven that I'm wrong?


Quote from: TheEngineer on November 21, 2015, 10:17:02 PM
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on November 20, 2015, 01:06:09 PM
I'm fairly familiar with what's a plane and what not as I used to want to be a fighter pilot and have a pretty fair grasps on planes and helicopters. Planes have blinking red and green lights on them. The lights I saw were were solid white to yellowish glow to them. My father who is retired Air Force also saw them and he agreed that they were satellites.
Except for the fact that aircraft navigation lights don't flash and that you can only see them when the aircraft is facing you.  Oh, and aircraft have rear facing steady white lights.  So...I would say you don't know much about aircraft.
You can see all of the lights at 40,000 feet. It's not all that hard to do.
Sure, if you are next to it.

This however, does not, in any way, prove you were not wrong.  So, I don't know what you are trying to do.
Google it yourself. You'll see that I'm right.
Logged
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #61 on: November 25, 2015, 06:21:18 PM »
I already showed you to be wrong.  Why would I need to google your wrongness?
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3735
  • +9/-7
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #62 on: November 25, 2015, 06:28:08 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 06:21:18 PM
I already showed you to be wrong.  Why would I need to google your wrongness?
You haven't proved me wrong. You can see navigation lights from 40,000 feet.
Logged
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #63 on: November 25, 2015, 06:34:01 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 21, 2015, 10:17:02 PM
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on November 20, 2015, 01:06:09 PM
I'm fairly familiar with what's a plane and what not as I used to want to be a fighter pilot and have a pretty fair grasps on planes and helicopters. Planes have blinking red and green lights on them. The lights I saw were were solid white to yellowish glow to them. My father who is retired Air Force also saw them and he agreed that they were satellites.
Except for the fact that aircraft navigation lights don't flash and that you can only see them when the aircraft is facing you.  Oh, and aircraft have rear facing steady white lights.  So...I would say you don't know much about aircraft.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

Luke 22:35-38

  • 3735
  • +9/-7
  • The earth is a globe, DUH! prove its not
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #64 on: November 25, 2015, 06:47:37 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 06:34:01 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 21, 2015, 10:17:02 PM
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on November 20, 2015, 01:06:09 PM
I'm fairly familiar with what's a plane and what not as I used to want to be a fighter pilot and have a pretty fair grasps on planes and helicopters. Planes have blinking red and green lights on them. The lights I saw were were solid white to yellowish glow to them. My father who is retired Air Force also saw them and he agreed that they were satellites.
Except for the fact that aircraft navigation lights don't flash and that you can only see them when the aircraft is facing you.  Oh, and aircraft have rear facing steady white lights.  So...I would say you don't know much about aircraft.
Ok, I was wrong about that but you can still see the green and red lights from 40,000 feet
Logged
The Bible doesn't support a flat earth.

Scripture, facts, science, stats, and logic is how I argue.
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #65 on: November 25, 2015, 08:04:08 PM »
Quote from: Luke 22:35-38 on November 25, 2015, 06:28:08 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 06:21:18 PM
I already showed you to be wrong.  Why would I need to google your wrongness?
You haven't proved me wrong.
Lolz.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #66 on: November 25, 2015, 11:47:50 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 09:12:33 AM
Nope, not even once.  You, on the other hand, had no idea what you were even talking about.
So that's why you evaded and discontinued the debate, right?  ;)
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #67 on: November 27, 2015, 01:30:11 AM »
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 25, 2015, 11:47:50 PM
So that's why you evaded and discontinued the debate, right?  ;)
That's rich coming from the guy that took multiple pages to answer the question about which spacecraft was accelerating.  But at least you finally realized you were wrong and admitted the answer. So...

Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 09:12:33 AM
Nope, not even once.  You, on the other hand, had no idea what you were even talking about.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

rabinoz

  • 26528
  • +0/-0
  • Real Earth Believer
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #68 on: November 27, 2015, 04:44:24 AM »
It won't add anything to the debate, but I would be the first to admit that I am human can be wrong at times.  There seem to be a few, what would you call them, maybe cyborgs among the posters who can, by definition never be wrong.
Even on the earth's model there may be evidence I have not yet seen that could change things.
So far the only arguments I have seen seem counter to my own observations or to those I regard as reliable.
Of course my evaluation of sources may differ from other posters.
Logged
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #69 on: November 29, 2015, 09:38:20 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 27, 2015, 01:30:11 AM
That's rich coming from the guy that took multiple pages to answer the question about which spacecraft was accelerating.  But at least you finally realized you were wrong and admitted the answer. So...
Back to lying already? Guess you just can't process the fact that you were obviously wrong. Side note: The question was not which spacecraft was accelerating. So wrong, again.

Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 09:12:33 AM
Nope, not even once.  You, on the other hand, had no idea what you were even talking about.
Except it was the other way around, so almost right this time.
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #70 on: November 29, 2015, 10:26:00 PM »
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 09:38:20 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 27, 2015, 01:30:11 AM
That's rich coming from the guy that took multiple pages to answer the question about which spacecraft was accelerating.  But at least you finally realized you were wrong and admitted the answer. So...
Back to lying already? Guess you just can't process the fact that you were obviously wrong. Side note: The question was not which spacecraft was accelerating. So wrong, again.

Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 09:12:33 AM
Nope, not even once.  You, on the other hand, had no idea what you were even talking about.
Except it was the other way around, so almost right this time.
Nope x 2.

Yet another lame attempt, Master_Evar.  You are really bad at this.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #71 on: November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 29, 2015, 10:26:00 PM
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 09:38:20 PM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 27, 2015, 01:30:11 AM
That's rich coming from the guy that took multiple pages to answer the question about which spacecraft was accelerating.  But at least you finally realized you were wrong and admitted the answer. So...
Back to lying already? Guess you just can't process the fact that you were obviously wrong. Side note: The question was not which spacecraft was accelerating. So wrong, again.

Quote from: TheEngineer on November 25, 2015, 09:12:33 AM
Nope, not even once.  You, on the other hand, had no idea what you were even talking about.
Except it was the other way around, so almost right this time.
Nope x 2.

Yet another lame attempt, Master_Evar.  You are really bad at this.

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 26, 2015, 09:20:46 AM
Ok, I pick object 1.  Object 1 happens to be a spacecraft will no windows and no external sensors.  Object 2 is also a spacecraft with no windows and no external sensors.  What is object 1's acceleration?

See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #72 on: November 30, 2015, 11:09:57 AM »
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM
See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?

Lolz again.  Do you ever get tired of being wrong Master_Evar?  Why do to even bother trying?  I slam the door in your face at every turn.  At some point you need to learn that following me through the door is a bad idea.  I do particularly enjoy making you look foolish, however.  I find it very fun, even if it is overly easy.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
*

TheEarthIsASphere.

  • 867
  • +0/-0
  • who fucking cares what shape the earth is lol
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #73 on: November 30, 2015, 01:36:18 PM »
Quote from: Papa Legba on November 22, 2015, 03:29:59 PM
Nice double-shitpost.

You could've just edited your first post, yet you didn't...

Now why would that be, I wonder?

(lol - forum slide creation!)

Why are you not banned?

Why are you not banned?
Logged
Quā ratiōne nōn redimus ad senectēs societātēs sapientium patrum? Quā ratiōne relinquimus eārum sapientiam?
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #74 on: November 30, 2015, 09:57:28 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 30, 2015, 11:09:57 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?

Lolz again.  Do you ever get tired of being wrong Master_Evar?  Why do to even bother trying?  I slam the door in your face at every turn.  At some point you need to learn that following me through the door is a bad idea.  I do particularly enjoy making you look foolish, however.  I find it very fun, even if it is overly easy.
*Facepalm*
You changed the question, remember?
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 26, 2015, 09:20:46 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on October 26, 2015, 05:43:11 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?
1. Both, in relation to each other. Depends on whichever you use as a reference point.
Ok, I pick object 1.  Object 1 happens to be a spacecraft will no windows and no external sensors.  Object 2 is also a spacecraft with no windows and no external sensors.  What is object 1's acceleration?
So, you are still wrong.
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #75 on: December 01, 2015, 07:27:24 AM »
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 30, 2015, 09:57:28 PM
*Facepalm*
You changed the question, remember?

Really?  Because it looks like I asked this:
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?

And you said:
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM
See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.
So nice try, but you fail, yet again.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #76 on: December 01, 2015, 07:50:58 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on December 01, 2015, 07:27:24 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 30, 2015, 09:57:28 PM
*Facepalm*
You changed the question, remember?

Really?  Because it looks like I asked this:
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?

And you said:
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM
See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.
So nice try, but you fail, yet again.

*sigh*:
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 30, 2015, 09:57:28 PM
*Facepalm*
You changed the question, remember?
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 26, 2015, 09:20:46 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on October 26, 2015, 05:43:11 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?
1. Both, in relation to each other. Depends on whichever you use as a reference point.
Ok, I pick object 1.  Object 1 happens to be a spacecraft will no windows and no external sensors.  Object 2 is also a spacecraft with no windows and no external sensors.  What is object 1's acceleration?
So, you are still wrong.
1. You changed the question immediately after I answered it, as if you weren't clear enough with the question.
2. I never took multiple pages to answer which spacecraft was accelerating. I answered it immediately. The question which came directly afterwards, as a changed question, did take a long time to answer because you didn't inform me what answer would satisfy you. I gave you a couple of answers which were both right, but you didn't seem satisfied with them and didn't immediately explain why. Which is why it took a long time to give you the answer you wanted.

Can you please stop "forgetting" parts of the conversation?
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #77 on: December 01, 2015, 07:28:29 PM »
So you admit that I did in fact ask which one is accelerating when you said I did not ask that question.  At least you can admit to one of your failings.

I love how you idiots jump at the opportunity to 'prove me wrong' and just end up making yourselves look even more idiotic.  It's hilarious and sad at the same time.  And, it's not a fight you can win.  I'll keep slamming that door in your face at every turn.  So if you enjoy the misery I cause you, please keep it up, because it makes me want to do it even more.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #78 on: December 01, 2015, 11:54:38 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on December 01, 2015, 07:28:29 PM
So you admit that I did in fact ask which one is accelerating when you said I did not ask that question.  At least you can admit to one of your failings.

I love how you idiots jump at the opportunity to 'prove me wrong' and just end up making yourselves look even more idiotic.  It's hilarious and sad at the same time.  And, it's not a fight you can win.  I'll keep slamming that door in your face at every turn.  So if you enjoy the misery I cause you, please keep it up, because it makes me want to do it even more.
You said a question which I didn't answer for many pages. So of course I assumed you meant after restating it. Otherwise, you were wrong when you said I didn't answer for many pages. Which means either you got the question wrong, or the time before an answer wrong. Now, which would you rather be wrong in?
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #79 on: December 02, 2015, 08:37:31 PM »
So you admit that I did ask the question that you said I did not ask.  Good to know. 
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #80 on: December 02, 2015, 11:21:18 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on December 02, 2015, 08:37:31 PM
So you admit that I did ask the question that you said I did not ask.  Good to know.
Yes. I never said you didn't asked that question. I said this:
Quote
You said a question which I didn't answer for many pages. So of course I assumed you meant after restating it. Otherwise, you were wrong when you said I didn't answer for many pages. Which means either you got the question wrong, or the time before an answer wrong. Now, which would you rather be wrong in?
So either you meant the wrong question, which is what I originally claimed, or you got the time before answer wrong.
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #81 on: December 03, 2015, 11:18:30 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 30, 2015, 11:09:57 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM
See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?
Lolz.
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #82 on: December 03, 2015, 11:49:13 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on December 03, 2015, 11:18:30 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 30, 2015, 11:09:57 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM
See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?
Lolz.
So the fact that you were wrong about a thing made you completely break down?
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #83 on: December 05, 2015, 03:00:07 PM »
But I was the one that was right. Which is clearly evidenced by the quote I provided.  (Your idiocy is showing again...)
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #84 on: December 06, 2015, 11:07:05 PM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on December 05, 2015, 03:00:07 PM
But I was the one that was right. Which is clearly evidenced by the quote I provided.  (Your idiocy is showing again...)
Quote
You said a question which I didn't answer for many pages. So of course I assumed you meant after restating it. Otherwise, you were wrong when you said I didn't answer for many pages. Which means either you got the question wrong, or the time before an answer wrong. Now, which would you rather be wrong in?
You were wrong about one thing at least. Either you got the question wrong, as I explained here (and also explain why I could legitimately assume you meant a different question) or you got the time flow wrong. Now, which is it?
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
*

TheEngineer

  • Planar Moderator
  • 15483
  • +0/-0
  • GPS does not require satellites.
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #85 on: December 07, 2015, 09:25:18 PM »
Neither.

Quote from: TheEngineer on December 03, 2015, 11:18:30 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 30, 2015, 11:09:57 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM
See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?
Lolz.

What I find hilarious, is that you idiots are trying to prove me wrong, even just once, on something I've posted, yet the best you can come up with is the wording of a question (which I've clearly proven you wrong about).  That's pretty pathetic on your part.  And nothing short of pure awesomeness on my part. 
Logged


"I haven't been wrong since 1961, when I thought I made a mistake."
        -- Bob Hudson
?

Master_Evar

  • 3381
  • +0/-0
  • Well rounded character
Re: Does anyone here accept they could be wrong.
« Reply #86 on: December 08, 2015, 12:07:38 AM »
Quote from: TheEngineer on December 07, 2015, 09:25:18 PM
Neither.

Quote from: TheEngineer on December 03, 2015, 11:18:30 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on November 30, 2015, 11:09:57 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on November 29, 2015, 11:50:53 PM
See? the question was "what is the acceleration of object 1?", not "which object is accelerating?". So you were wrong about that. Let's see if you'll accept you got this wrong, or if you'll even try to deny something as obviously wrong as this.

Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?
Lolz.

What I find hilarious, is that you idiots are trying to prove me wrong, even just once, on something I've posted, yet the best you can come up with is the wording of a question (which I've clearly proven you wrong about).  That's pretty pathetic on your part.  And nothing short of pure awesomeness on my part.

You are wrong on one thing of these things I have brung forth. It is impossible to be right on both of them. You can't both have meant the right question and the right timespan. Either you meant the question you are now because of some reason spamming all over the thread, and got the timespan wrong, or you meant another question (i.e. the wrong question), and got the timespan right. Because that question you keep spamming I answered immediately and then you changed it immediately:
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 26, 2015, 09:20:46 AM
Quote from: Master_Evar on October 26, 2015, 05:43:11 AM
Quote from: TheEngineer on October 25, 2015, 03:44:47 PM
Answer two questions, then:
1. Which one is accelerating?
2. What happens if one of them is removed?
1. Both, in relation to each other. Depends on whichever you use as a reference point.
Ok, I pick object 1.  Object 1 happens to be a spacecraft will no windows and no external sensors.  Object 2 is also a spacecraft with no windows and no external sensors.  What is object 1's acceleration?
So, either you got the question wrong or the timespan wrong. Now, which is it?
Logged
Math is the language of the universe.

The inability to explain something is not proof of something else.

We don't speak for reality - we only observe it. An observation can have any cause, but it is still no more than just an observation.

When in doubt; sources!
Pages: 1 2 [3]   Go Up
« previous next »